Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (8)
- Civil Procedure (5)
- Civil Law (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
-
- Legal Profession (4)
- Legislation (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Rule of Law (2)
- Common Law (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Remedies (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- Privacy Law (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Social Welfare Law (1)
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Judges
The Confident Court, Jennifer Mason Mcaward
The Confident Court, Jennifer Mason Mcaward
Jennifer Mason McAward
Despite longstanding rules regarding judicial deference, the Supreme Court’s decisions in its October 2012 Term show that a majority of the Court is increasingly willing to supplant both the prudential and legal judgments of various institutional actors, including Congress, federal agencies, and state universities. Whatever the motivation for such a shift, this Essay simply suggests that today’s Supreme Court is a confident one. A core group of justices has an increasingly self-assured view of the judiciary’s ability to conduct an independent assessment of both the legal and factual aspects of the cases that come before the Court. This piece discusses …
Infrequently Asked Questions, Edward T. Swaine
Infrequently Asked Questions, Edward T. Swaine
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
If appellate advocates could hear from courts about topics that might be raised during oral argument—as opposed to relying solely on their ability to anticipate the issues—might their answers be better? That seems likely, but it is unlikely that research could confirm that, as judicial practice overwhelmingly favors impromptu questioning. Spontaneity may be harmless if the question was predictable, or unavoidable if a judge just thought of the question. But sometimes advocates have to answer challenging questions concerning the law, facts, or implications of a position—questions that help decide the case, either due to the quality of the answer or …
The Nevada Supreme Court Between 2010 And 2014, Jordan T. Smith
The Nevada Supreme Court Between 2010 And 2014, Jordan T. Smith
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Voting Rights Act And The "New And Improved" Intent Test: Old Wine In New Bottles, Randolph M. Scott-Mclaughlin
The Voting Rights Act And The "New And Improved" Intent Test: Old Wine In New Bottles, Randolph M. Scott-Mclaughlin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural Due Process Claims, Erwin Chemerinsky
Procedural Due Process Claims, Erwin Chemerinsky
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Qualified Immunity When Facts Are In Dispute, Leon Friedman
Qualified Immunity When Facts Are In Dispute, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sua Sponte Actions In The Appellate Courts: The "Gorilla Rule" Revisited, Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Aaron S. Lichter
Sua Sponte Actions In The Appellate Courts: The "Gorilla Rule" Revisited, Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Aaron S. Lichter
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
All Copying Is Not Created Equal: Borrowed Language In Supreme Court Opinions, Adam Feldman
All Copying Is Not Created Equal: Borrowed Language In Supreme Court Opinions, Adam Feldman
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Nela Touro Conference 1999 Selected Second Circuit Cases Of Interest, Lawrence Solotoff
Nela Touro Conference 1999 Selected Second Circuit Cases Of Interest, Lawrence Solotoff
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.