Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- International Law (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
-
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Economics (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- International Trade Law (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- Military, War, and Peace (1)
- Organizations Law (1)
- President/Executive Department (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Institution
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Combating Terrorism With The Alien Terrorist Removal Court, Jonathan Yu
Combating Terrorism With The Alien Terrorist Removal Court, Jonathan Yu
Jonathan Yu
No abstract provided.
Balancing The Scales: Adhuc Sub Judice Li Est Or Trial By Media, Casey J. Cooper
Balancing The Scales: Adhuc Sub Judice Li Est Or Trial By Media, Casey J. Cooper
Casey J Cooper
The right to freedom of expression and free press is recognized under almost all major human rights instruments and domestic legal systems—common and civil—in the world. However, what do you do when a fundamental right conflicts with another equally fundamental right, like the right to a fair trial? In the United States, the freedom of speech, encompassing the freedom of the press, goes nearly unfettered: the case is not the same for other common law countries. In light of cultural and historic facts, institutional factors, modern realities, and case-law, this Article contends that current American jurisprudence does not take into …
Behavioral International Law, Tomer Broude
Behavioral International Law, Tomer Broude
Tomer Broude
Economic analysis and rational choice have in the last decade made significant inroads into the study of international law and institutions, relying upon standard assumptions of perfect rationality of states and decision-makers. This approach is inadequate, both empirically and in its tendency towards outdated formulations of political theory. This article presents an alternative behavioral approach that provides new hypotheses addressing problems in international law while introducing empirically grounded concepts of real, observed rationality. First, I address methodological objections to behavioral analysis of international law: the focus of behavioral research on the individual; the empirical foundations of behavioral economics; and behavioral …