Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly (1)
- Bill of Rights (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional interpretation (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
-
- Decision making (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Due process (1)
- England (1)
- Fairness (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Generalism (1)
- History (1)
- Hurtado v. California (1)
- Incrementalism (1)
- Institutional realism (1)
- Jones v. Robbins (1)
- Judicial decision-making (1)
- Judicial interpretation (1)
- Judicial virtues (1)
- Juries (1)
- Magna Carta (1)
- Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. (1)
- Murray's Lessee v. Hoboken Land Improvement Co. (1)
- Powell v. Alabama (1)
- Precedents (1)
- Right to impartial jury (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Antitrust And The Judicial Virtues, Daniel A. Crane
Antitrust And The Judicial Virtues, Daniel A. Crane
Articles
Although commentators frequently debate how judges should decide antitrust cases substantively, little attention has been paid to theories of judicial virtue in antitrust decision making. This essay considers four pairings of virtues: (1) striving for substantive purity versus conceding to institutional realism; (2) incrementalism versus generalism; (3) presenting a unified face versus candidly conceding differences among judges on an appellate panel; and (4) adhering strictly to stare decisis versus freely updating precedents to reflect evolving economic learning or conditions. While recognizing the complexities that sometimes pull judges in the opposite direction, this Article gives the nod to institutional realism, incrementalism, …
Free-Standing Due Process And Criminal Procedure: The Supreme Court's Search For Interpretive Guidelines, Jerold H. Israel
Free-Standing Due Process And Criminal Procedure: The Supreme Court's Search For Interpretive Guidelines, Jerold H. Israel
Articles
When I was first introduced to the constitutional regulation of criminal procedure in the mid-1950s, a single issue dominated the field: To what extent did the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment impose upon states the same constitutional restraints that the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments imposed upon the federal government? While those Bill of Rights provisions, as even then construed, imposed a broad range of constitutional restraints upon the federal criminal justice system, the federal system was (and still is) minuscule as compared to the combined systems of the fifty states. With the Bill of Rights provisions …