Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Judicial misconduct (3)
- Disqualification (2)
- Behavior (1)
- Bias (1)
- Book reviews (1)
-
- Bork (Robert) (1)
- Confirmaitons (1)
- Conflicts of interest (1)
- Cover ups (1)
- Crisis of accountability (1)
- Davis (Richard) (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Dworkin (Ronald) (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Federal judges (1)
- Judicial disqualification (1)
- Judicial ethics (1)
- Judicial independence (1)
- Judiciary (1)
- Justice (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Misconduct accusations (1)
- Morality (1)
- Morals (1)
- Nominations (1)
- Prejudice (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Judges Behaving Badly . . . Then Slinking Away, Maureen Carroll
Judges Behaving Badly . . . Then Slinking Away, Maureen Carroll
Reviews
A federal judge is accused of misconduct and an investigation begins. Before the investigation has concluded, though, the judge leaves her post. What happens next? Does it create an accountability gap, and if so, how much should that concern us? These are the questions that Veronica Root Martinez takes up in Avoiding Judicial Discipline.
On Dworkin And Borkin, Tom Lininger
On Dworkin And Borkin, Tom Lininger
Michigan Law Review
This Essay will use Dworkin's and Davis's scholarship as a jumping-off point for a discussion of the Supreme Court nomination process. I argue that while Dworkin's and Davis's books, when read together, expose a significant problem with the current nomination process, a possible solution to this predicament may lie in a change to the judicial code of ethics and the procedural rules for confirmation of judges. My analysis will proceed in four steps. Part I will address Dworkin's arguments. Part II will evaluate the analysis and evidence in Davis's book. Part III will consider an additional variable to which neither …
Self-Regulation Of Judicial Misconduct Could Be Mis-Regulation, Anthony D'Amato
Self-Regulation Of Judicial Misconduct Could Be Mis-Regulation, Anthony D'Amato
Michigan Law Review
Judge Harry T. Edwards has written a lucid and seemingly logical plea for the judiciary to be granted exclusive self-regulation over all matters of judicial misconduct that fall short of crimes or impeachable offenses. His essay demonstrates the seriousness with which he regards misconduct that would bring shame to the federal judiciary. He believes that the judiciary as a whole is the best institution to ascertain and take measures against individual aberrant judges who are guilty of various forms of misconduct, and I have no doubt of the sincerity of his belief. Yet when we look at claims for self-regulation …
Regulating Judicial Misconduct And Divining "Good Behavior" For Federal Judges, Harry T. Edwards
Regulating Judicial Misconduct And Divining "Good Behavior" For Federal Judges, Harry T. Edwards
Michigan Law Review
In recent years, we have witnessed an unprecedented number of instances in which federal judges have been accused of criminal behavior and other serious acts of misconduct. This raises major concerns regarding the scope and enforcement of canons of conduct for members of the judicial branch. It would be presumptuous for anyone to suggest a complete understanding of the notion of "good behavior" for federal judges, or to claim a fully satisfactory prescription for the problem of "judicial misconduct." That is not my object. In reflecting on these issues, however, I have come to realize that I may not share …
Disqualifications For Interest Of Lower Federal Court Judges: 28 U.S.C. § 455, Michigan Law Review
Disqualifications For Interest Of Lower Federal Court Judges: 28 U.S.C. § 455, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Disqualification of a judge occurs when he is ineligible by law to sit in a particular case. At the Supreme Court level, disqualification is a personal decision of the individual justice, who seldom records the reasons for his decision. Thus, there is little material on the Court's disqualification practices that can be subjected to legal analysis. However, substantial case law on disqualification has developed in the lower federal courts, where the decision of a trial judge to sit or step down in a case may appear in the trial record and is subject to review by a court of appeals. …
Disqualification Of Judges By Prejudice, Edson R. Sunderland
Disqualification Of Judges By Prejudice, Edson R. Sunderland
Articles
Under the provisions of Section 21 of the Federal Judicial Code, Victor Berger and others, who had been indicted under the Espionage Act in the Northern District of Illinois, filed an affidavit charging Judge Landis with personal bias and prejudice against them as German-Americans, and moved for the assignment of another judge to preside at their trial. The motion was overruled by Judge Landis, and he himself presided at the trial, and the defendants were convicted and sentenced. The Supreme Court of the United States, to which the matter came on certificate, held, three justices dissenting, that Judge Landis could …