Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Attorney (2)
- Judicial discretion (2)
- Lawyer (2)
- Sentencing guidelines (2)
- Trial (2)
-
- Advocacy (1)
- African American (1)
- Batson (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Collateral estoppel (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Counsel (1)
- Court (1)
- Criminal (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Criminal Trial (1)
- Defendant (1)
- Deliberation (1)
- Discretion (1)
- Discriminate (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Due process (1)
- Edmonson (1)
- England (1)
- Error (1)
- Estoppel (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Examination (1)
- Examine (1)
- Fair trial (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Res Judicata: California V. Sims, Alan Saltzman
Res Judicata: California V. Sims, Alan Saltzman
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Milking The New Sacred Cow: The Supreme Court Limits The Peremptory Challenge On Racial Grounds In Powers V. Ohio And Edmonson V. Leesville Concrete Co., Bradley R. Kirk
Milking The New Sacred Cow: The Supreme Court Limits The Peremptory Challenge On Racial Grounds In Powers V. Ohio And Edmonson V. Leesville Concrete Co., Bradley R. Kirk
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Propriety Of Jury Questioning: A Remedy For Perceived Harmless Error, Laurie Forbes Neff
The Propriety Of Jury Questioning: A Remedy For Perceived Harmless Error, Laurie Forbes Neff
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Have We Come Full Circle? Judicial Sentencing Discretion Revived In Booker And Fanfan, Sandra D. Jordan
Have We Come Full Circle? Judicial Sentencing Discretion Revived In Booker And Fanfan, Sandra D. Jordan
Pepperdine Law Review
The much anticipated Supreme Court decision in United States v. Booker and Fanfan has both invalidated the mandatory nature of the federal Sentencing Guidelines as well as restored judicial discretion for federal judges. With the Booker decision there is a renewed opportunity to correct some of the imbalance that came about as a result of the mandatory guidelines and the sentencing policies of the past twenty years. Booker has implications for all future sentencing as the power between the judiciary and the jury has been realigned and the power of the government has been reduced. Sentencing cannot accomplish legitimate goals …
Kimbrough And Gall: Taking Another "Crack" At Expanding Judicial Discretion Under The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Chris Gaspard
Kimbrough And Gall: Taking Another "Crack" At Expanding Judicial Discretion Under The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Chris Gaspard
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.