Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Intellectual Property Law (16969)
- Science and Technology Law (2515)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (2380)
- Internet Law (1877)
- Computer Law (1430)
-
- Communications Law (1220)
- International Law (1183)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1162)
- International Trade Law (1145)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (740)
- Law and Society (723)
- Constitutional Law (688)
- Privacy Law (688)
- Law and Economics (683)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (675)
- Health Law and Policy (664)
- Litigation (601)
- Commercial Law (510)
- Food and Drug Law (477)
- Library and Information Science (474)
- Legislation (455)
- Contracts (451)
- Human Rights Law (443)
- Courts (422)
- First Amendment (418)
- Administrative Law (414)
- Consumer Protection Law (405)
- Environmental Law (390)
- Business (385)
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (1426)
- Fordham Law School (933)
- UC Law SF (851)
- UIC School of Law (809)
- American University Washington College of Law (723)
-
- SelectedWorks (671)
- University of Georgia School of Law (590)
- University of Michigan Law School (556)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (505)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (385)
- University of Washington School of Law (368)
- Marquette University Law School (350)
- Boston University School of Law (337)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (326)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (323)
- Santa Clara Law (319)
- Columbia Law School (293)
- University of Richmond (288)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (271)
- Duke Law (267)
- William & Mary Law School (251)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (239)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (234)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (192)
- Seattle University School of Law (186)
- The University of Akron (184)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (169)
- BLR (164)
- University of New Hampshire (164)
- Georgetown University Law Center (156)
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (2240)
- Intellectual property (1674)
- Patent (926)
- Patents (851)
- Trademark (608)
-
- Intellectual Property Law (578)
- Intellectual Property (558)
- Patent law (546)
- Copyright law (490)
- Fair use (420)
- Technology (376)
- Internet (325)
- Infringement (310)
- Copyright infringement (286)
- Innovation (270)
- Antitrust (267)
- Law (247)
- Trademarks (214)
- Licensing (203)
- Lanham Act (194)
- Copyright Act (191)
- First Amendment (183)
- Google (179)
- Patent Law (176)
- Copyright Law (167)
- Privacy (164)
- Federal Circuit (162)
- Software (160)
- Patent infringement (153)
- Trademark law (152)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1014)
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (824)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (785)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (530)
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law (418)
-
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (322)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (309)
- All Faculty Scholarship (303)
- Articles (299)
- Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. (253)
- Faculty Publications (253)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (248)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (225)
- Michigan Law Review (219)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (173)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (173)
- Scholarly Works (169)
- ExpressO (158)
- Peter K. Yu (154)
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (147)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (140)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (140)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (138)
- Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal (134)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (132)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (130)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (129)
- Scholarship Chronologically (126)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (119)
- Seattle University Law Review (116)
- Publication Type
Articles 15991 - 16020 of 16972
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Protection Of Industrial Designs In Canada, Robert E. Mitchell
Protection Of Industrial Designs In Canada, Robert E. Mitchell
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Designer As An Expert Witness, Roland Carter
A Designer As An Expert Witness, Roland Carter
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Where Is The Protection For Creative Product Design?, Albert C. Johnston
Where Is The Protection For Creative Product Design?, Albert C. Johnston
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
How To Improve Design Patent Prosecution Techniques, Bernard Ansher
How To Improve Design Patent Prosecution Techniques, Bernard Ansher
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Copyright-Like Protection For Designs, Ralph S. Brown
Copyright-Like Protection For Designs, Ralph S. Brown
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Scope Of Industrial Design Protection Under Trademark And Unfair Competition Laws, John B. Pegram
The Scope Of Industrial Design Protection Under Trademark And Unfair Competition Laws, John B. Pegram
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Design Protection And The New Technologies: The United States Experience In A Transnational Perspective, J. H. Reichman
Design Protection And The New Technologies: The United States Experience In A Transnational Perspective, J. H. Reichman
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Discussion Of Industrial Design Protection Practice In Governmental Agencies And Courts
Discussion Of Industrial Design Protection Practice In Governmental Agencies And Courts
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Copyright Legislation And Technological Change, Jessica D. Litman
Copyright Legislation And Technological Change, Jessica D. Litman
Articles
Throughout its history, copyright law has had difficulty accommodating technological change. Although the substance of copyright legislation in this century has evolved from meetings among industry representatives whose avowed purpose was to draft legislation that provided for the future,6 the resulting statutes have done so poorly. The language of copyright statutes has been phrased in fact-specific language that has grown obsolete as new modes and mediums of copyrightable expression have developed. Whatever copyright statute has been on the books has been routinely, and justifiably, criticized as outmoded.7 In this Article, I suggest that the nature of the legislative process we …
Public-Private Partnerships In Biomedical Research: Resolving Conflicts Of Interest Arising Under The Federal Technology Transfer Act Of 1986, Thomas N. Bulleit Jr.
Public-Private Partnerships In Biomedical Research: Resolving Conflicts Of Interest Arising Under The Federal Technology Transfer Act Of 1986, Thomas N. Bulleit Jr.
Journal of Law and Health
The Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 offers private industry the opportunity to enter into cooperative research and development agreements with scientists in federal laboratories and to gain rights in intellectual property resulting from such collaborations. Increased collaborations with private industry, however, expands the potential for conflicts of interest. Resolution of the tensions between the Technology Transfer Act and federal conflict of interest rules is important because federal laboratories, such as the NIH, are experiencing a loss of senior scientists to universities and private industry due to inadequate compensation. These tensions may be resolved by some combination of policies, regulations, …
A Garland Of Reflections On Three International Copyright Topics, Peter Jaszi
A Garland Of Reflections On Three International Copyright Topics, Peter Jaszi
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
The United States is a party to many copyright treaties, including a network of bilateral arrangements with other countries and one regional agreement. I will concentrate on the two major multilateral agreements to which the United States is a party, the Universal Copyright Convention ("UCC") and the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works ("Berne Convention").
Intellectual Property In International Trade: Opportunities And Risks Of A Gatt Connection, J. H. Reichman
Intellectual Property In International Trade: Opportunities And Risks Of A Gatt Connection, J. H. Reichman
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Professor Reichman uncovers a paradox at the heart of the debate about bringing international intellectual property relations within a GATT Code of Conduct. On the one hand, the industrialized countries that subscribe to free-market principles at home want to impose a highly regulated market for intellectual goods on the rest of the world, one in which authors and inventors may "reap where they have sown." On the other hand, the developing countries that restrict free competition at home envision a totally unregulated world market for intellectual goods, one in which "competition is the lifeblood of commerce." To unravel this paradox, …
An Inquiry Into The Merits Of Copyright: The Challenges Of Consistency, Consent And Encouragement Theory, Wendy J. Gordon
An Inquiry Into The Merits Of Copyright: The Challenges Of Consistency, Consent And Encouragement Theory, Wendy J. Gordon
Faculty Scholarship
Hostility to copyright has a long and honorable history. In the nineteenth century, for example, Lord Macaulay argued that while copyright might be necessary to ensure a "supply of good books," the monopoly that it imposed was at best a necessary evil.
"For the sake of the good we must submit to the evil; but the evil ought
not to last a day longer than is necessary for the purpose of securing the good."
A number of studies critical of intellectual property followed in our century. The most well known is probably the economically oriented 1970 study by Stephen Breyer …
Of Moral Rights And Resale Royalties: The Kennedy Bill, Marshall A. Leaffer
Of Moral Rights And Resale Royalties: The Kennedy Bill, Marshall A. Leaffer
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Rejection Of Executory Contracts Under The Intellectual Property Bankruptcy Protection Act Of 1988, John J. Fry
The Rejection Of Executory Contracts Under The Intellectual Property Bankruptcy Protection Act Of 1988, John J. Fry
Cleveland State Law Review
In October of 1988, Congress enacted the Intellectual Property Bankruptcy Protection Act. The Act is intended to "promote the development and licensing of intellectual property by providing certainty to licensees in situations where the licensor files bankruptcy and seeks to reject the license as an executory contract by providing the licensee an "assurance of being able to continue to use the licensed intellectual property after rejection, while debtors/licensors will still be able to free themselves of burdensome obligations." The Act adds a new subsection to 11 U.S.C. §365 which allows the licensee of intellectual property under an executory contract to …
The "Law Of Ideas" Reconsidered, Margreth Barrett
The "Law Of Ideas" Reconsidered, Margreth Barrett
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Copyright Law - Gray Marketing - The First Sale Doctrine Of Copyright Law Closes Another Avenue Of Redress, Julie S. Congdon
Copyright Law - Gray Marketing - The First Sale Doctrine Of Copyright Law Closes Another Avenue Of Redress, Julie S. Congdon
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Notes On Conceptions Of Property: Scientific And Ordinary - 1989, Wendy J. Gordon
Notes On Conceptions Of Property: Scientific And Ordinary - 1989, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
There's a lot that won't neatly fit in my LocKe article that needs to be said. The following, re ordinary and scientific theories of property, go in the Conception of Prop Article, for which there still seems a need.
More On Indirect Protections: Piggyback Damage Claims - 1989, Wendy J. Gordon
More On Indirect Protections: Piggyback Damage Claims - 1989, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
One issue is whether indirect i/p protection should be allowed to, or encouraged to, piggyback on other forms of protection, 1 ike privacy & contract law. (This is the KEWANEE issue. It's a matter of general pol icy, and of preemption.). Another issue is whether, within federal i/p law, a cause of action based on limited statutory infringement should be handled any differently because other damage damage which wouldn't be actionable alone under the relevant federal statute - is present. (This is raised by the NATION issue. It's a matter of legislative intent & general policy,) Although both issues involve …
Design Protection And The New Technologies: The United States Experience In A Transnational Perspective, Jerome H. Reichman
Design Protection And The New Technologies: The United States Experience In A Transnational Perspective, Jerome H. Reichman
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Trademark Licensing Of Names, Insignia, Characters And Designs: The Current Status Of The Boston Pro Hockey Per Se Infringement Rule, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 567 (1989), John J. Voortman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Patents And The Progress Of Science: Exclusive Rights And Experimental Use, Rebecca S. Eisenberg
Patents And The Progress Of Science: Exclusive Rights And Experimental Use, Rebecca S. Eisenberg
Articles
In this article I analyze the proper scope of an experimental use exemption from patent infringement liability by comparing the rationales behind promoting technological progress through granting exclusive patent rights in inventions with competing arguments for promoting scientific progress by allowing all investigators to enjoy free access to the discoveries of other scientists. I begin by reviewing key features of the patent laws and theoretical justifications for granting patent monopolies in order to clarify the implications of existing patent doctrine and theory for an experimental use exemption. I then look to the literature in the sociology, history, and philosophy of …
Manifest Intent And Copyrightability: The Destiny Of Joint Authorship, Therese M. Brady
Manifest Intent And Copyrightability: The Destiny Of Joint Authorship, Therese M. Brady
Fordham Urban Law Journal
The 1976 Copyright Act defines joint ownership as requiring an "intent" by multiple authors to merge their works into a single work. Prior to 1976, two standards of determining intent existed in the case law. One was an objective standard, known as common design, and the other was a subjective standard. In part because the 1976 Act does not mention common design, subjective intent came to dominate joint authorship jurisprudence post-1976. As a result of this dominance, many authors have been deprived of their rights. Brady argues that a new standard should be set out by the courts that once …
French Copyright Law: A Comparative Overview, Jane C. Ginsburg
French Copyright Law: A Comparative Overview, Jane C. Ginsburg
Faculty Scholarship
French copyright law has attracted considerable recent attention in the United States. Debate over the nature and scope of legislation permitting U.S. entry into the Berne Union for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works spurred some of this interest: because France was a founding member of that Union, some participants in the Berne adherence process perceived "Berne level" copyright protection to be synonymous with "French" copyright protection. As Congress continues to consider modifications to the U.S. copyright law, particularly in the area of moral rights, France again supplies a leading example. And the on-going litigation in France concerning the …
A Designer's View Of Current Industrial Design Protection In The United States, Cooper C. Woodring
A Designer's View Of Current Industrial Design Protection In The United States, Cooper C. Woodring
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Discussion Of Current Industrial Design Law Issues
Discussion Of Current Industrial Design Law Issues
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Discussion Of International Developments In Industrial Design Law
Discussion Of International Developments In Industrial Design Law
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Copyright Doctrine Of 'Works Made For Hire', I. Trotter Hardy
The Copyright Doctrine Of 'Works Made For Hire', I. Trotter Hardy
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Distilling The Witches' Brew Of Fair Use In Copyright Law, Jay Dratler Jr.
Distilling The Witches' Brew Of Fair Use In Copyright Law, Jay Dratler Jr.
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Umc Electronics V. United States: Should Reduction To Practice Be A Requirement Of The On Sale Bar?, Michael R. Schacht
Umc Electronics V. United States: Should Reduction To Practice Be A Requirement Of The On Sale Bar?, Michael R. Schacht
Seattle University Law Review
This Note asserts that the UMC Electronics v. United States court's "all circumstances" test cannot be consistently applied and does not satisfy the policies underlying the bar. Therefore, a test is proposed that distinguishes between an offer to sell an invention and the actual sale of an invention. In developing the test, this Note will first explain the policies that underly the on sale bar and review the past application of the bar. Second, the UMC case will be examined and its facts and holding explained. Third, the panel majority's conclusion that a reduction to practice has not been, and …