Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (18)
- Criminal Procedure (14)
- Criminal Law (10)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (10)
- Courts (8)
-
- State and Local Government Law (8)
- Supreme Court of the United States (7)
- Jurisprudence (6)
- Judges (5)
- Evidence (4)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- International Law (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Privacy Law (1)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (5)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- University of Kentucky (2)
-
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Connecticut (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Fourth amendment (7)
- Constitution (5)
- Probable cause (5)
- Search and seizure (5)
- 1990) (4)
-
- Exclusionary rule (4)
- Federal (4)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (4)
- New York (4)
- Police (4)
- Privacy (4)
- Search and Seizure (4)
- State (4)
- U.S. Cont. Amend. IV (4)
- Warrant (4)
- §12 (4)
- Court of Appeals (3)
- Defendant (3)
- Fourth Amendment (3)
- Reasonable suspicion (3)
- 4th amendment (2)
- Alabama v. White (2)
- Arrest (2)
- Canine sniff (2)
- Constitutional (2)
- Fifth Amendment (2)
- Interrogation (2)
- Law enforcement (2)
- Michigan v. Long (2)
- Surveillance (2)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (5)
- UIC Law Review (3)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (3)
- Articles (2)
- Kentucky Law Journal (2)
-
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles and Papers (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- Washington Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 29 of 29
Full-Text Articles in Fourth Amendment
Guilt: Henry Friendly Meets The Maharal Of Prague, Irene Merker Rosenberg, Yale L. Rosenberg
Guilt: Henry Friendly Meets The Maharal Of Prague, Irene Merker Rosenberg, Yale L. Rosenberg
Michigan Law Review
So while the overnight deliberation rule is at least partially bound up with the question of reliability and relates to the judicial process itself, the broader and more fundamental issue raised by this law is whether we should free the guilty to preserve a value that we deem necessary to proper working of the criminal justice process, regardless of the culpability of individual defendants. To this Judge Friendly's answer is generally no, 113 and the MaHaRaL's is yes.
Anticipatory Search Warrants: The Supreme Court's Opportunity To Reexamine The Framework Of The Fourth Amendment, David P. Mitchell
Anticipatory Search Warrants: The Supreme Court's Opportunity To Reexamine The Framework Of The Fourth Amendment, David P. Mitchell
Vanderbilt Law Review
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures," and provides that "no War-rants shall issue, but upon probable cause."' Although its language is relatively clear, the application of the Fourth Amendment has created more controversy than the application of perhaps any other constitutional amendment.' Given the questions raised by a police-endorsed practice of anticipatory search warrants,' the search and seizure debate is far from over.
An anticipatory search warrant is a warrant based on a showing of probable cause that particular evidence of a crime will exist at a specific location in the future. Challenges …
Tapping The State Court Resource, Ann Althouse
Tapping The State Court Resource, Ann Althouse
Vanderbilt Law Review
Supreme Court opinions about federal jurisdiction usually feature painstaking analysis of the text of statutes and constitutional clauses and the intentions of those who authored them, or they are based on long-standing traditions of equity jurisprudence. But, as the Court's many divided decisions attest, these materials are scarcely clear enough to determine all outcomes. Thus, the Justices often seem to weigh various interests when they draw the lines around federal jurisdiction. The Court sometimes openly acknowledges this interest weighing, referring to "state interests" and "federal interests."
Justice Stevens has taken exception to this process. He has ob- served that much …
The Fourth Amendment And Its Exclusionary Rule, Yale Kamisar
The Fourth Amendment And Its Exclusionary Rule, Yale Kamisar
Articles
"The history of liberty," Justice Felix Frankfurter once noted, "has largely been the history of observance of procedural safeguards" and "the history of the destruction of liberty," Professor Anthony Amsterdam has added, "has largely been the history of the relaxation of those safeguards in the face of plausible sounding governmental claims of a need to deal with widely frightening and emotion freighted threats to the good order of society." These plausible-sounding government claims are being heard today -and they are putting enormous pressure on the Fourth Amendment, the constitutional provision that protects "the right of the people to be secure …
Confessions, Criminals, And Community, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Confessions, Criminals, And Community, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Reworking The Warrant Requirement: Resuscitating The Fourth Amendment, Phyllis T. Bookspan
Reworking The Warrant Requirement: Resuscitating The Fourth Amendment, Phyllis T. Bookspan
Vanderbilt Law Review
Ninety-three years ago, in response to a newspaper account, Mark Twain wrote: "The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated." While it may be premature to sound the death knell for the fourth amendment, it is no exaggeration to suggest that unless drastic action is taken to remedy the destructive erosion of the fourth amendment, it may as well be buried.
Current search and seizure doctrine is inconsistent and incoherent.' No one, including the police who are to abide by it, judges who apply it, or the people who are protected by it, has any meaningful sense of what the …
Abridged Too Far: Anticipatory Search Warrants And The Fourth Amendment, Michael J. Flannery
Abridged Too Far: Anticipatory Search Warrants And The Fourth Amendment, Michael J. Flannery
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Verdugo Case: The United States And The Comity Of Nations, Mark Weston Janis
The Verdugo Case: The United States And The Comity Of Nations, Mark Weston Janis
Faculty Articles and Papers
No abstract provided.
Justice Harlan And The Bill Of Rights: A Model For How A Classic Conservative Court Would Enforce The Bill Of Rights, Nadine Strossen
Justice Harlan And The Bill Of Rights: A Model For How A Classic Conservative Court Would Enforce The Bill Of Rights, Nadine Strossen
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Anticipatory Search Warrants: Constitutionality, Requirements, And Scope, James A. Adams
Anticipatory Search Warrants: Constitutionality, Requirements, And Scope, James A. Adams
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Third-Part Consent: Rethinking Police Conduct And The Fourth Amendment, Gregory S. Fisher
Search And Seizure, Third-Part Consent: Rethinking Police Conduct And The Fourth Amendment, Gregory S. Fisher
Washington Law Review
Two recent decisions offer different approaches for assessing police conduct in third-party consent cases. In Illinois v. Rodriguez the United States Supreme Court held that police may rely on third parties' apparent authority to consent to a search so long as police reasonably believe in third parties' authority. In State v. Leach, the Supreme Court of Washington held that police cannot rely on third parties' consent when defendants are present and able to object, even if defendants did not object to the search. This Comment argues that courts should focus on police conduct, rather than on defendants' presence or on …
The Exigent Circumstances Exception To The Warrant Requirement, H. Patrick Furman
The Exigent Circumstances Exception To The Warrant Requirement, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
Evaluating The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule: The Problem Of Police Compliance With The Law, William C. Heffernan, Richard W. Lovely
Evaluating The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule: The Problem Of Police Compliance With The Law, William C. Heffernan, Richard W. Lovely
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Part I of this article reviews background matters bearing on our research - in particular, we discuss the Court's framework for analyzing exclusion as a deterrent safeguard, the research questions that need to be raised within that framework, and the research strategy we adopted in light of the Court's approach to exclusion. Part II analyzes our findings on police knowledge of the rules of search and seizure. Part III analyzes our findings on officers' willingness to obey the law. Part IV evaluates our findings in light of policy questions concerning the exclusionary rule. We consider whether the Court should retain …
White On White: Anonymous Tips, Reasonable Suspicion, And The Constitution, David S. Rudstein
White On White: Anonymous Tips, Reasonable Suspicion, And The Constitution, David S. Rudstein
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
World Without A Fourth Amendment, Christopher Slobogin
World Without A Fourth Amendment, Christopher Slobogin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The subject of this Article is suggested by a single question: How would we regulate searches and seizures if the Fourth Amendment did not exist? This question is a useful one to ask even leaving aside the possibility of amending the amendment. Starting on a blank slate, as it were, should free us from current preconceptions about the law of search and seizure, ingrained after years of analyzing current dogma. Viewed from this fresh perspective, we might gain a better understanding of the values at stake when the state seeks to obtain evidence or detain suspects. This new understanding in …
The Constitutionality Of High-Speed Pursuits Under The Fourth And Fourteenth Amendments, Kathryn R. Urbonya
The Constitutionality Of High-Speed Pursuits Under The Fourth And Fourteenth Amendments, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Reasonable Articulable Suspicion - The Demise Of Terry V. Ohio And Individualized Suspicion, Esther Jeanette Windmueller
Reasonable Articulable Suspicion - The Demise Of Terry V. Ohio And Individualized Suspicion, Esther Jeanette Windmueller
University of Richmond Law Review
The plethora of law review articles and cases on search and seizure demonstrates the confusion and frustration in fourth amendment stop-and-frisk jurisprudence. The fourth amendment to the Constitution guarantees that persons will be free of "unreasonable searches and seizures . . . and no Warrants shall issue but upon probable cause." A "stop-and-frisk" is a warrantless detention and search of a person by a police officer to investigate for unlawfulness. Although the United States Supreme Court has issued many investigative stop decisions, the Court has failed to promulgate a coherent and practical stop-and-frisk procedure for law enforcement personnel to follow. …
Beyond Griswold: Foucauldian And Republican Approaches To Privacy, Stephen J. Schnably
Beyond Griswold: Foucauldian And Republican Approaches To Privacy, Stephen J. Schnably
Articles
No abstract provided.
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Faculty Scholarship
The exclusionary evidence rules derived from the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments continue to play an important role in constitutional criminal procedure, despite the intense controversy that surrounds them. The primary justification for these rules has shifted from an "imperative of judicial integrity" to the "deterrence of police conduct that violates... [constitutional] rights." Regardless of the justification it uses for the rules' existence, the Supreme Court continues to limit their breadth "at the margin," when "the acknowledged costs to other values vital to a rational system of criminal justice" outweigh the deterrent effects of exclusion. The most notable limitation on …
"Black And Blue Encounters" Some Preliminary Thoughts About Fourth Amendment Seizures: Should Race Matter?, Tracey Maclin
"Black And Blue Encounters" Some Preliminary Thoughts About Fourth Amendment Seizures: Should Race Matter?, Tracey Maclin
UF Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Horton V. California: The Plain View Doctrine Loses Its Inadvertency, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 891 (1991), John A. Mack
Horton V. California: The Plain View Doctrine Loses Its Inadvertency, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 891 (1991), John A. Mack
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Alabama V. White: Anonymous Tip Held Sufficient Basis For Investigatory Stop Under Fourth Amendment, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 909 (1991), Martin K. Berks
Alabama V. White: Anonymous Tip Held Sufficient Basis For Investigatory Stop Under Fourth Amendment, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 909 (1991), Martin K. Berks
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
James V. Illinois: Wither The Exclusionary Rule - Not Quite Yet, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 493 (1991), David H. Norris
James V. Illinois: Wither The Exclusionary Rule - Not Quite Yet, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 493 (1991), David H. Norris
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Fourth Amendment: The Right Of The People To Be Secure In Their Persons, Homes, Papers, And Effects, Yale Kamisar
The Fourth Amendment: The Right Of The People To Be Secure In Their Persons, Homes, Papers, And Effects, Yale Kamisar
Book Chapters
Three quarters of a century ago, the Supreme Court expressed some thoughts on constitutional interpretation that bear repeating today (Weems v. United States):
Time works changes, brings into existence new conditions and purposes. Therefore, a principle to be vital must be capable of wider application than the mischief which gave it birth. This is particularly true of constitutions .... [In interpreting] a constitution, therefore, our contemplation cannot be only of what has been but what may be. Under any other rule a constitution would indeed be as easyof application as it would be deficient in efficacy and power.
The Fourth …