Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Response, Dana R. Hassin
How Much Is Too Much? Rule 704(B) Opinions On Personal Use Vs. Intent To Distribute, Dana R. Hassin
How Much Is Too Much? Rule 704(B) Opinions On Personal Use Vs. Intent To Distribute, Dana R. Hassin
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Recipe For Confusion: Congress And The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Professor Daniel J. Capra
A Recipe For Confusion: Congress And The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Professor Daniel J. Capra
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expert Testimony On Eyewitness Identification: Admissibility And Alternatives, Thomas Dillickrath
Expert Testimony On Eyewitness Identification: Admissibility And Alternatives, Thomas Dillickrath
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Response To Professor Graham, Brett C. Powell
A Response To Professor Graham, Brett C. Powell
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Evidence Of Innocence Offered By The Criminal Defendant: "Not So Fast"; Response, Professor Kenneth W. Graham Jr.
Evidence Of Innocence Offered By The Criminal Defendant: "Not So Fast"; Response, Professor Kenneth W. Graham Jr.
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Response To Professor Graham, Thomas Dillickrath
A Response To Professor Graham, Thomas Dillickrath
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Response, Yvette J. Bessent
Choice And Boundary Problems In Logerquist, Hummert, And Kumho Tire, David H. Kaye
Choice And Boundary Problems In Logerquist, Hummert, And Kumho Tire, David H. Kaye
Journal Articles
This article, part of a symposium on the opinion of the Arizona Supreme Court in Logerquist v. McVey, questions that court’s rationales for refusing to apply heightened scrutiny to psychiatric testimony about the retrieval of repressed memories. It also challenges the court’s use of a “personal observations” exception to the heightened scrutiny standard of Frye v. United States. It proposes that a better solution to problems of scientific and expert evidence would be to adopt a sliding scale that attends to the use to which the evidence is put and the degree to which it has been shown to be …
A Suggestion On Suggestion, Richard D. Friedman, Stephen J. Ceci
A Suggestion On Suggestion, Richard D. Friedman, Stephen J. Ceci
Articles
Part I of the full article briefly describes the history and current slate of research into children's suggestibility. In this part, we argue that, although psychological researchers disagree considerably over the degree to which he suggestibility of young children may lead to false allegations of sexual abuse, there is an overwhelming consensus that children are suggestible to a degree that, we believe, must be regarded as significant. In presenting this argument, we respond to the contentions of revisionist scholars, particularly those recently expressed by Professor Lyon. We show that there is good reason to believe the use of highly suggestive …