Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Google (3)
- Expert testimony (2)
- Rosetta Stone (2)
- 985 Reasons to Comply with Discovery Requests (1)
- Achieving an Appropriate Balance: The Use of Counsel Sanctions in Connection with the Resolution of E- Discovery Misconduct (1)
-
- Answer (1)
- BART (1)
- Bay Area Rapid Transit (1)
- Best Practice Commentary on the Use of Search and Information Retrieval Methods in E-Discovery (1)
- Calyon v. Mizuho Securities USA Inc (1)
- Databases E-Discovery and Criminal Law (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Electronic Discovery in Large Organizations (1)
- Equity Analytics LLC v. Lundin (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Interrogatories (1)
- Motion to dismiss (1)
- OCR (1)
- Objection (1)
- Optical Character Recognition (1)
- Qualcomm Inc. v. Broadcom Corp.: 9.259 (1)
- Rhoads v. Building Materials Corp. of America (1)
- Rosetta (1)
- United States v. O’Keefe (1)
- Using Keyword Search Terms in E-Discovery and How They Relate to Issues of Responsiveness Privilege Evidence Standards and Rube Goldberg (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Vol. Xxiv, Tab 61 - Ex. 2 - Rosetta Stone's Answers To Google's First Set Of Interrogatories, Rosetta Stone
Vol. Xxiv, Tab 61 - Ex. 2 - Rosetta Stone's Answers To Google's First Set Of Interrogatories, Rosetta Stone
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 43 - Google Memorandum In Support Of Its Motion To Exclude Expert Report And Opinion Of Dr. Kent Van Liere, Google
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Xiv, Tab 51 - Google's Objection To Evidence And Motion To Strike, Google
Vol. Xiv, Tab 51 - Google's Objection To Evidence And Motion To Strike, Google
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Using Keyword Search Terms In E-Discovery And How They Relate To Issues Of Responsiveness, Privilege, Evidence Standards, And Rube Goldberg, Gregory L. Fordham
Using Keyword Search Terms In E-Discovery And How They Relate To Issues Of Responsiveness, Privilege, Evidence Standards, And Rube Goldberg, Gregory L. Fordham
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The emergence of digital evidence and the widespread implementation of e-discovery has brought both benefit and repercussion. In many respects, digital evidence has proven to be a better truth detector than its paper counterpart. At the same time, the volumes in which digital evidence exists make time-tested discovery techniques impractical. In fact, so significant are the technological differences between paper and digital evidence that even the handling procedures require considerable overhaul.
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Jessica M. Yoke
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Jessica M. Yoke
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present the third issue of the 2008–2009 academic school year, which also is our Annual Survey on E-Discovery.