Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Children (1)
- Confrontation Clause (1)
- Cross-examination (1)
- Custodial interrogations (1)
- Exclusionary rule (1)
-
- Exclusions (1)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (1)
- Gideon v. Wainwright (1)
- Hearsay (1)
- Impeachment (1)
- Incorporation (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Lineups (1)
- Mapp v. Ohio (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Police (1)
- Searches and Seizures (1)
- Sexual abuse (1)
- Sixth Amendment (1)
- Statements (1)
- Testimony (1)
- Tome v. United States (1)
- Trials (1)
- Warren (Earl) (1)
- Witnesses (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Prior Statements Of A Witness: A Nettlesome Corner Of The Hearsay Thicket, Richard D. Friedman
Prior Statements Of A Witness: A Nettlesome Corner Of The Hearsay Thicket, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In Tome v United States, for the fifth time in eight years, the Supreme Court decided a case presenting the problem of how a child's allegations of sexual abuse should be presented in court. Often the child who charges that an adult abused her is unable to testify at trial, or at least unable to testify effectively under standard procedures. These cases therefore raise intriguing and difficult questions related to the rule against hearsay and to an accused's right under the Sixth Amendment to confront the witnesses against him. One would hardly guess that, however, from the rather arid debate …
The Warren Court And Criminal Justice: A Quarter-Century Retrospective, Yale Kamisar
The Warren Court And Criminal Justice: A Quarter-Century Retrospective, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Many commentators have observed that when we speak of "the Warren Court," we mean the Warren Court that lasted from 1962 (when Arthur Goldberg replaced Felix Frankfurter) to 1969 (when Earl Warren retired). But when we speak of the Warren Court's "revolution" in American criminal procedure we mean the Warren Court that lasted from 1961 (when the landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio was decided) to 1966 or 1967. In its final years, the Warren Court was not the same Court that had handed down Mapp or Miranda v. Arizona.