Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (6)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Courts (3)
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- Litigation (2)
-
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Housing Law (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Science and Technology Law (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Torts (1)
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Arkansas Rule of Evidence 803(25); child hearsay exception; child not competent to testify; Confrontation Clause; (1)
- Child sexual abuse (1)
- Confrontation Clause (1)
- Confrontation clause (1)
- Coy v. Iowa (1)
-
- Evidence (1)
- Evidence (Law) -- California (1)
- Evidence; DNA evidence; admissibility of DNA evidence; DNA profiling; Frye standard; relevancy standard; (1)
- Expert evidence (1)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (1)
- Hearsay (1)
- Hearsay evidence (1)
- Immunity (1)
- Impeachment of witnesses (1)
- Junk science (1)
- Maryland v. Craig (1)
- Protection of Child Abuse Victims (1)
- Rape Victims and the Legal System (1)
- Right of confrontation (1)
- Sex Discrimination (1)
- Statistics -- California (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Testimony (1)
- Testimony (Law) (1)
- Toxic Torts - Evidence (1)
Articles 1 - 19 of 19
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Evidence, Marc T. Treadwell
Evidence, Marc T. Treadwell
Mercer Law Review
In five previous Georgia and Eleventh Circuit evidence survey articles, the author extolled the virtues of the proposed Georgia Rules of Evidence.' These rules roughly tracked the Federal Rules of Evidence and would replace Georgia's existing evidence code which is, in reality, not a code at all but rather a jumble of disjointed statutes found in several different titles of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated and countless court decisions. The proposed rules were first introduced in the General Assembly in 1989 and were approved by the Senate in 1990 and 1991 but have never been reported out of the …
Evidence—Novel Scientific Evidence—Dna Profiling Held Admissible Under The Relevancy Standard. Prater V. State., Ralph Spory
Evidence—Novel Scientific Evidence—Dna Profiling Held Admissible Under The Relevancy Standard. Prater V. State., Ralph Spory
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Child Hearsay Exception In Sexual Abuse Cases—New Arkansas Supreme Court Rule Conflicts With New General Assembly Rule: Which Controls? Vann V. State., Gregory Clay Sandefur
Constitutional Law—Child Hearsay Exception In Sexual Abuse Cases—New Arkansas Supreme Court Rule Conflicts With New General Assembly Rule: Which Controls? Vann V. State., Gregory Clay Sandefur
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Payne V. Tennessee: The Supreme Court Places Its Stamp Of Approval On The Use Of "Victim Impact Evidence" During Capital Sentencing Proceedings, Stephen M. Sargent
Payne V. Tennessee: The Supreme Court Places Its Stamp Of Approval On The Use Of "Victim Impact Evidence" During Capital Sentencing Proceedings, Stephen M. Sargent
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Beyond Maryland V. Craig: Can And Should Adult Rape Victims Be Permitted To Testify By Closed-Circuit Television?, Lisa Hamilton Thielmeyer
Beyond Maryland V. Craig: Can And Should Adult Rape Victims Be Permitted To Testify By Closed-Circuit Television?, Lisa Hamilton Thielmeyer
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Evidence, Marc T. Treadwell
Evidence, Marc T. Treadwell
Mercer Law Review
For the past several years, the State Bar of Georgia has lobbied vigorously for the adoption of a new Georgia Evidence Code based upon the Federal Rules of Evidence. Few would dispute that the existing Georgia Evidence Code, which really is not a code at all but rather an amorphous amalgam of disjointed statutes and thousands of judicial decisions, is in need of revision. Apparently, however, there is considerable dispute regarding exactly what changes should be made.
The proposed Georgia Rules of Evidence is the product of an intensive study by the State Bar of the deficiencies of the existing …
The Worst Evidence Principle: The Best Hypothesis As To The Logical Structure Of Evidence Law, Edward J. Imwinkelried
The Worst Evidence Principle: The Best Hypothesis As To The Logical Structure Of Evidence Law, Edward J. Imwinkelried
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science In The Courtroom, John F. Baughman
Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science In The Courtroom, John F. Baughman
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom by Peter W. Huber
When The Blue Bus Crashes Into The Gate: The Problem With People V. Collins In The Probabilistic Evidence Debate, Mark L. Huffman
When The Blue Bus Crashes Into The Gate: The Problem With People V. Collins In The Probabilistic Evidence Debate, Mark L. Huffman
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Evidence Of Religion And The Religion Of Evidence, Michael Ariens
Evidence Of Religion And The Religion Of Evidence, Michael Ariens
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Admissibility Of Hearsay Under The Confrontation Clause: Reliability Requirement For Hearsay Admitted Under A Non-"Firmly Rooted" Exception - Idaho V. Wright, A. Perry Wadsworth Jr.
Constitutional Admissibility Of Hearsay Under The Confrontation Clause: Reliability Requirement For Hearsay Admitted Under A Non-"Firmly Rooted" Exception - Idaho V. Wright, A. Perry Wadsworth Jr.
Campbell Law Review
This note discusses the facts of Idaho v. Wright, examines the history of the admissibility of hearsay under the Confrontation Clause, and analyzes the Wright decision. This note concludes that by excluding the use of corroborative evidence in determining the trustworthiness of non-firmly rooted hearsay, the Court enhances Confrontation Clause protection for criminal defendants, but perhaps at the expense of some crime victims, such as sexually abused children.
Oops - We Forgot To Put It In The Refrigerator: Dna Identification And The State's Duty To Preserve Evidence, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 809 (1992), Albert M.T. Finch Iii
Oops - We Forgot To Put It In The Refrigerator: Dna Identification And The State's Duty To Preserve Evidence, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 809 (1992), Albert M.T. Finch Iii
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Forfeiture Of Property For Drug Offenders Under Illinois And Federal Statute: Zero Tolerance, Zero Exceptions, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 389 (1992), T. J. Hiles
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Notes: Criminal Law — Evidence — Evidence Of Refusal To Submit To Chemical Breath Test For Alcohol Admissible Only When Relevant To Matters Other Than Defendant's Innocence Or Guilt. Krauss V. State, 322 Md. 376, 587 A.2d 1102 (1991), Howard S. Cohen
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Aftermath Of The Iran-Contra Trials: The Uncertain Status Of Derivative Use Immunity, Jerome A. Murphy
The Aftermath Of The Iran-Contra Trials: The Uncertain Status Of Derivative Use Immunity, Jerome A. Murphy
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Character And Credibility: A Proposal To Realign Federal Rules Of Evidence 608 And 609, Robert D. Okun
Character And Credibility: A Proposal To Realign Federal Rules Of Evidence 608 And 609, Robert D. Okun
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Toxic Torts - Evidence - Third Circuit Recognizes Medical Monitoring Tort And Makes Significant Rulings Concerning Expert Testimony In Toxic Tort Cases, Noel C. Birle
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Mental Anguish And Humiliation Suffered By Victims Of Housing Discrimination, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 39 (1992), Larry Heinrich
The Mental Anguish And Humiliation Suffered By Victims Of Housing Discrimination, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 39 (1992), Larry Heinrich
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
A First Amendment-Sixth Amendment Dilemma: Manuel Noriega Pushes The American Judicial System To The Outer Limits Of The First Amendment, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 563 (1992), Lance R. Peterson
A First Amendment-Sixth Amendment Dilemma: Manuel Noriega Pushes The American Judicial System To The Outer Limits Of The First Amendment, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 563 (1992), Lance R. Peterson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.