Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Evidence Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

1992

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 1 - 30 of 62

Full-Text Articles in Evidence

Evidence—Novel Scientific Evidence—Dna Profiling Held Admissible Under The Relevancy Standard. Prater V. State., Ralph Spory Oct 1992

Evidence—Novel Scientific Evidence—Dna Profiling Held Admissible Under The Relevancy Standard. Prater V. State., Ralph Spory

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Inevitable Discovery: An Exception Beyond The Fruits, Robert M. Bloom Oct 1992

Inevitable Discovery: An Exception Beyond The Fruits, Robert M. Bloom

Boston College Law School Faculty Papers

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Law—Child Hearsay Exception In Sexual Abuse Cases—New Arkansas Supreme Court Rule Conflicts With New General Assembly Rule: Which Controls? Vann V. State., Gregory Clay Sandefur Oct 1992

Constitutional Law—Child Hearsay Exception In Sexual Abuse Cases—New Arkansas Supreme Court Rule Conflicts With New General Assembly Rule: Which Controls? Vann V. State., Gregory Clay Sandefur

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Payne V. Tennessee: The Supreme Court Places Its Stamp Of Approval On The Use Of "Victim Impact Evidence" During Capital Sentencing Proceedings, Stephen M. Sargent Sep 1992

Payne V. Tennessee: The Supreme Court Places Its Stamp Of Approval On The Use Of "Victim Impact Evidence" During Capital Sentencing Proceedings, Stephen M. Sargent

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Stories Versus Theories At The Cardozo Evidence Conference: It's Just Another Metaphor To Me, Lewis H. Larue Aug 1992

Stories Versus Theories At The Cardozo Evidence Conference: It's Just Another Metaphor To Me, Lewis H. Larue

Scholarly Articles

Not available.


Beyond Maryland V. Craig: Can And Should Adult Rape Victims Be Permitted To Testify By Closed-Circuit Television?, Lisa Hamilton Thielmeyer Jul 1992

Beyond Maryland V. Craig: Can And Should Adult Rape Victims Be Permitted To Testify By Closed-Circuit Television?, Lisa Hamilton Thielmeyer

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Transport Modeling – Technical And Legal Issues, Adrian Brown Jun 1992

Transport Modeling – Technical And Legal Issues, Adrian Brown

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

27 pages.

Contains footnotes.


The Evolution And Performance Of Groundwater Management Institutions In Southern California, William Blomquist Jun 1992

The Evolution And Performance Of Groundwater Management Institutions In Southern California, William Blomquist

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

12 pages.


Data, Correspondence, Reports, And Exhibits For Ground Water Rights Cases (Or, Challenges In Developing And Presenting Data To Support A Ground Water Rights Case), Robert E. Brogden Jun 1992

Data, Correspondence, Reports, And Exhibits For Ground Water Rights Cases (Or, Challenges In Developing And Presenting Data To Support A Ground Water Rights Case), Robert E. Brogden

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

17 pages.


Data, Correspondence, Reports And Exhibits For Groundwater Quality/Hazardous Waste Cases: File Preparation And Maintenance, James M. Kerr, Jr. Jun 1992

Data, Correspondence, Reports And Exhibits For Groundwater Quality/Hazardous Waste Cases: File Preparation And Maintenance, James M. Kerr, Jr.

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

7 pages.


Depositions And Oral Testimony [Outline], M.E. (Sandy) Macdougall Jun 1992

Depositions And Oral Testimony [Outline], M.E. (Sandy) Macdougall

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

16 pages.


Pre-Trial Case Preparation In Complex Groundwater Litigation: The Lawyer’S Role, Michael D. Shimmin Jun 1992

Pre-Trial Case Preparation In Complex Groundwater Litigation: The Lawyer’S Role, Michael D. Shimmin

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

12 pages.


Case Preparation: The Expert Witness’ Role, Bruce E. Kroeker Jun 1992

Case Preparation: The Expert Witness’ Role, Bruce E. Kroeker

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

9 pages.


The View From The Bench: The Perspective Of A Water Judge, Robert A. Behrman Jun 1992

The View From The Bench: The Perspective Of A Water Judge, Robert A. Behrman

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

9 pages.


Agenda: Uncovering The Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology And Policy In The 1990s, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Rocky Mountain Ground-Water Conference (1992), Colorado Ground-Water Association Jun 1992

Agenda: Uncovering The Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology And Policy In The 1990s, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Rocky Mountain Ground-Water Conference (1992), Colorado Ground-Water Association

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

Sponsored by Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law and the Rocky Mountain Ground-Water Conference, organized by the Colorado Ground-Water Association.

Faculty for the conference included University of Colorado School of Law professor Lawrence J. MacDonnell.

Nearly half the people in the United States rely on groundwater as their primary water source. As demands for groundwater grow, it becomes increasingly important for lawyer and technical professionals to understand the legal and hydrologic issues arising in groundwater development, use, and protection. These issues will be the focus of the Center's thirteenth annual summer program, June 15-17, 1992 ...


The Legal Framework For Aquifer Issues, Douglas L. Grant Jun 1992

The Legal Framework For Aquifer Issues, Douglas L. Grant

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

20 pages.

Contains references.


Practical Considerations For Effective Use Of Expert Witnesses And Computer Models In Complex Groundwater Litigation, William A. Paddock Jun 1992

Practical Considerations For Effective Use Of Expert Witnesses And Computer Models In Complex Groundwater Litigation, William A. Paddock

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

14 pages.


The Worst Evidence Principle: The Best Hypothesis As To The Logical Structure Of Evidence Law, Edward J. Imwinkelried May 1992

The Worst Evidence Principle: The Best Hypothesis As To The Logical Structure Of Evidence Law, Edward J. Imwinkelried

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science In The Courtroom, John F. Baughman May 1992

Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science In The Courtroom, John F. Baughman

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom by Peter W. Huber


When The Blue Bus Crashes Into The Gate: The Problem With People V. Collins In The Probabilistic Evidence Debate, Mark L. Huffman Mar 1992

When The Blue Bus Crashes Into The Gate: The Problem With People V. Collins In The Probabilistic Evidence Debate, Mark L. Huffman

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


Experts As Hearsay Conduits: Confrontation Abuses In Opinion Testimony, Ronald L. Carlson Feb 1992

Experts As Hearsay Conduits: Confrontation Abuses In Opinion Testimony, Ronald L. Carlson

Scholarly Works

The dispute over whether litigants may use experts to run unexamined hearsay into the trial record is a microcosm of a larger debate. The larger question is whether judicial review of expert testimony should be passive, or whether the expert witness process should be marked by active judicial policing. Does the plethora of expert opinions presently being offered in modern trials merit special scrutiny by the courts?

Some scholars urge that courts must accommodate experts. Proponents of this view favor few challenges to the unrestricted rendition of opinions by an expert, whether the expert is real or self-proclaimed. Under this ...


Standards Of Review In Illinois Criminal Cases: The Need For Major Reform, 17 S. Ill. U. L.J. 51 (1992), Timothy P. O'Neill Jan 1992

Standards Of Review In Illinois Criminal Cases: The Need For Major Reform, 17 S. Ill. U. L.J. 51 (1992), Timothy P. O'Neill

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit, Brief Of Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc., National Association Of Manufacturers, Business Roundtable, And Chemical Manufacturers Association As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondent, William Daubert And Joyce Daubert, Individually And As Guardians Ad Litem For Jason Daubert, And Anita De Young, Individually And As Gaurdian Ad Litem For Eric Schuller V. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Paul F. Rothstein, Victor E. Schwartz, Robert P. Charrow, Scott L. Winkelman, Edward C. Wu, Richard Duesenberg, David F. Zoll, Donald D. Evans, Jan S. Amundson, Edward P. Good Jan 1992

On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit, Brief Of Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc., National Association Of Manufacturers, Business Roundtable, And Chemical Manufacturers Association As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondent, William Daubert And Joyce Daubert, Individually And As Guardians Ad Litem For Jason Daubert, And Anita De Young, Individually And As Gaurdian Ad Litem For Eric Schuller V. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Paul F. Rothstein, Victor E. Schwartz, Robert P. Charrow, Scott L. Winkelman, Edward C. Wu, Richard Duesenberg, David F. Zoll, Donald D. Evans, Jan S. Amundson, Edward P. Good

U.S. Supreme Court Briefs

The Federal Rules of Evidence exclude expert scientific testimony when it has been developed without regard for accepted scientific methods.

This case focuses on expert scientific evidence. Such evidence plays a vital and often dispositive role in modern litigation. For scientific evidence to be helpful to the factfinder it must meet some minimal threshold of reliability. To hold otherwise would be to allow a system of adjudication based more on chance than on reason.


Book Review Of Litigation Services Directory, James S. Heller Jan 1992

Book Review Of Litigation Services Directory, James S. Heller

Library Staff Publications

No abstract provided.


Post-Modern Hearsay Reform: The Importance Of Complexity, Christopher B. Mueller Jan 1992

Post-Modern Hearsay Reform: The Importance Of Complexity, Christopher B. Mueller

Articles

No abstract provided.


Rationalizing Hearsay: A Proposal For A Best Evidence Hearsay Rule, Michael L. Seigel Jan 1992

Rationalizing Hearsay: A Proposal For A Best Evidence Hearsay Rule, Michael L. Seigel

UF Law Faculty Publications

The enterprise of this article is the theoretical construction of an optimal solution to the hearsay conundrum. Its first task is the elucidation of the premises upon which a rational hearsay rule can be built. Thus, the article starts by exploring the relationship between hearsay doctrine and the foundation of all rational truth-seeking enterprises, inductive logic. The article continues with an examination of the relationship between hearsay evidence and trial dynamics, for a workable rule must take into account the actual functioning of our adversary system.'" This two-pronged analysis leads to the proposal of a "best evidence hearsay rule."


Struggling To Stop The Flood Of Unreliable Expert Testimony, David L. Faigman Jan 1992

Struggling To Stop The Flood Of Unreliable Expert Testimony, David L. Faigman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Truth In Evidence And The Privilege Clause–A Compromised Relationship, James R. Mccall Jan 1992

Truth In Evidence And The Privilege Clause–A Compromised Relationship, James R. Mccall

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


The New Wave Of Hearsay Reform Scholarship, Roger C. Park Jan 1992

The New Wave Of Hearsay Reform Scholarship, Roger C. Park

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Juror Decision Making And The Evaluation Of Hearsay Evidence, Roger C. Park, Peter Miene, Eugene Borgida Jan 1992

Juror Decision Making And The Evaluation Of Hearsay Evidence, Roger C. Park, Peter Miene, Eugene Borgida

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.