Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Exclusionary rule (2)
- Mapp v. Ohio (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Automobile exception (1)
- Closed containers (1)
-
- Constitutional law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Damages (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Evidence law (1)
- Fourth amendment (1)
- Good faith (1)
- Inventory (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Lawful arrest (1)
- Minnesota (1)
- Personal privacy (1)
- Personal records (1)
- Police (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Searches (1)
- Seizures (1)
- White collar crime (1)
- Wolf v. Colorado (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The Exclusionary Rule: An Examination Of The Case Law And The Present Posture Of The Florida Supreme Court, Michael Shaw Tammaro
The Exclusionary Rule: An Examination Of The Case Law And The Present Posture Of The Florida Supreme Court, Michael Shaw Tammaro
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Habeas Corpus And The Mapp Exclusionary Rule After Stone V. Powell, Philip Halpern
Federal Habeas Corpus And The Mapp Exclusionary Rule After Stone V. Powell, Philip Halpern
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
Assaults On The Exclusionary Rule: Good Faith Limitations And Damage Remedies, Pierre J. Schlag
Assaults On The Exclusionary Rule: Good Faith Limitations And Damage Remedies, Pierre J. Schlag
Publications
No abstract provided.
Robbins, Belton And Ross: Reconsideration Of Bright Line Rules For Warrantless Container Searches, Christopher J. St. John
Robbins, Belton And Ross: Reconsideration Of Bright Line Rules For Warrantless Container Searches, Christopher J. St. John
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note analyzes the development of these warrantless container search and seizure exceptions to furnish a comprehensive review of their justifications. The major focus is on the underlying rationale of Belton and Ross and the possible ramifications of such far-reaching warrant exceptions. The Note recommends that state courts interpret their state constitutions to allow the less drastic alternative of warrantless seizures of certain containers rather than warrantless searches as permitted by Belton and Ross under the federal Constitution. In addition, an analytic methodology for isolating interrelated yet distinct search and seizure questions is proposed. Initially, a general background of fourth …
Failed Explanations And Criminal Responsibility: Experts And The Unconscious, Stephen J. Morse
Failed Explanations And Criminal Responsibility: Experts And The Unconscious, Stephen J. Morse
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure Of America: The Case For Keeping The Exclusionary Rule, Yale Kamisar
Search And Seizure Of America: The Case For Keeping The Exclusionary Rule, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Twenty years ago, concurring in Mapp v. Ohio (1961), Justice William 0. Douglas looked back on Wolf v. Colorado (1949) (which had held that the Fourth Amendment's substantive protection against "unreasonable search and seizure" was binding on the states through the due process clause, but that the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule was not) and recalled that the Wolf case had evoked "a storm of controversy which only today finds its end." But, of course, in the twenty years since Justice Douglas made that observation the storm of controversy has only intensified, and it has engulfed the exclusionary rule in federal …
The Business Papers Rule: Personal Privacy And White Collar Crime, John S. Applegate
The Business Papers Rule: Personal Privacy And White Collar Crime, John S. Applegate
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.