Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
- Publication
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Evidence—Wire Recordings Of Confidential Communications Between Husband And Wife Held Inadmissable, Gerard J. O’Brien
Evidence—Wire Recordings Of Confidential Communications Between Husband And Wife Held Inadmissable, Gerard J. O’Brien
Buffalo Law Review
Hunter v. Hunter, 169 Pa. Super. 498, 83 A (2d) 401 (1951).
Evidence-Privilege-Confidential Communications Between Husband And Wife, James I. Huston
Evidence-Privilege-Confidential Communications Between Husband And Wife, James I. Huston
Michigan Law Review
Husband sued for divorce alleging that wife drank excessively and humiliated him in public by her conduct, and that she continually made false and profane accusations designed to make his life unbearable. As proof of the latter charge, plaintiff was allowed to introduce in evidence a wire recording of conversations between plaintiff and defendant in their bedroom. Plaintiff's son by a previous marriage had, by prearrangement with plaintiff, installed in their bedroom a microphone connected to a wire-recorder in the son's adjoining bedroom, with which recordings were made of four separate conversations between plaintiff and defendant. The recordings substantiated plaintiff's …
Evidence-The Use Of Blood Grouping Tests In Disputed Parentage Proceedings-A Scientific Basis For Discussion, Lewis R. Williams, Jr. S.Ed.
Evidence-The Use Of Blood Grouping Tests In Disputed Parentage Proceedings-A Scientific Basis For Discussion, Lewis R. Williams, Jr. S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Much has been written concerning the validity of the so-called "blood-grouping tests" in bastardy and other legal proceedings. The general tenor of the writings is in favor of wider acceptance by the courts of the results of these tests. This comment is to be no exception. However, it is the purpose here to emphasize the scientific validity of the blood-grouping tests and to acquaint the reader with the theory upon which the tests rest. If lawyers and judges understand the scientific basis of the tests, a more intelligent decision upon the validity of any given result can be formed, and …