Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Avocet Development Corp. v. McLean Bank (1)
- Branzburg v. Hayes (1)
- Brown v. Commonwealth (1)
- Brown v. Peters (1)
-
- Clark v. Commonwealth (1)
- Doe v. Thomas (1)
- Evans-Smith v. Commonwealth (1)
- Ex Parte Nugent (1)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (1)
- Garland v. Torre (1)
- Gilbert v. Allied Chemical Corporation (1)
- Goins v. Commonwealth (1)
- Index (1)
- LaRouche v. National Broadcasting Company (1)
- Leybourne v. Commonwealth (1)
- Martin v. Commonwealth (1)
- Nicholaou v. Harrington (1)
- Portsmouth Transit Co. v. Brickhouse (1)
- Privacy Protection Act (1)
- Riley v. City of Chester (1)
- United States v. Cuthbertson (1)
- United States v. Steelhammer (1)
- Zurcher v. Stanford Daily News (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Newsman's Confidential Source Privilege In Virginia, Phillip Randolph Roach Jr.
The Newsman's Confidential Source Privilege In Virginia, Phillip Randolph Roach Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
The two hundredth anniversary celebration of the United States Constitution in 1987 provided an excellent opportunity to reflect upon how we now interpret the political doctrines that influenced the founding fathers in forming our government. At the time of the American Revolution, the basic tenets and freedoms that were written into the Declaration of Independence, and later incorporated into the Bill of Rights through the efforts of James Madison and George Mason of Virginia were considered essential human rights.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Evidence, Charles E. Friend
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Evidence, Charles E. Friend
University of Richmond Law Review
In terms of evidence legislation, the most significant development of the past year may be what did not happen in Virginia. In late 1987 the Supreme Court of Virginia, following a long period of careful study, recommended against the adoption of a statutory code of evidence for Virginia. In announcing the court's conclusion, Chief Justice Carrico cited a passage from the 1987 Annual Survey of VirginiaLaw, which stated: "When it comes to the formulation of rules of evidence, the common-law system of judge-made rules, supplemented by a steady flow of case opinions from competent appellate courts, is far superior to …