Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1)
- Bowles v. Willingham (1)
- Civil Aeronautics Board (1)
- Department of Agriculture (1)
-
- Domestic Passenger Fare Investigation (1)
- Hearing Examiners (1)
- ICC v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. (1)
- Interstate Commerce Commission (1)
- King v. International Harvester Co (1)
- Londoner v. Denver (1)
- Morgan v. United States (1)
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States (1)
- PhiladelphiaCo. v. SEC (1)
- PowhatanMining Co. v. Ickes (1)
- Public Utility Holding Company Act (1)
- Red Star Manufacturing Co. v. Grimes (1)
- Sinclair Oil Corp. v. Smith (1)
- United States v. Nugent (1)
- Weiss v. Weiner (1)
- Wirtz v. Balder Electric (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Written Evidence In Administrative Proceedings: A Plea For Less Talk, Roger J. Corber
Written Evidence In Administrative Proceedings: A Plea For Less Talk, Roger J. Corber
University of Richmond Law Review
The notion that talk is the absence of thought is more poetry than analysis. Nevertheless, lawyers know that all talk is not thought and that there is at least a grain of truth in the poet's logic. Some of the same logic may mercifully be applied to the proceedings of ad- ministrative agencies to test whether all the talk in such proceedings is necessary to a rational result and sound implementation of public policy.
Pretrial Discovery- Use Of A Party's Own Deposition
Pretrial Discovery- Use Of A Party's Own Deposition
University of Richmond Law Review
At common law depositions were admissible in evidence in ecclesiastical and equity courts but not in trials at law unless both parties consented. Today, the simple rules of the common law in this area have been entirely replaced by statutory law and Rules of Court. The recent Virginia case of King v. InternationalHarvester Co. is illustrative of the problems en- countered when courts have undertaken judicial interpretation of these codifications.