Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (2)
- Index (2)
- ANA (1)
- AORN (1)
- Access (1)
-
- Agency (1)
- American Nurses Association (1)
- Anatomy of a Trial (1)
- Association of Operating Room Nurses (1)
- Automobile Insurance: Medical payments coverage construed as a separate contract (1)
- Bland v. Warwickshire (1)
- Bradley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1)
- Brady on Bank Checks (1)
- Carney v. Sears (1)
- Civil Rights and Responsibilities Under the Constitution (1)
- Commissioner v. Lo Bue (1)
- Commonwealth v. Coyle (1)
- Continuance (1)
- Contracts: A breaking away from the traditional law of seals in Virginia (1)
- Cornfeldt v. Tongen (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Court (1)
- Court Appointed Counsel: The Commonwealth's Attorney as counsel for the defense (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure: Appeal or Russian roulette (1)
- Cullingworthv. Pollard (1)
- Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital (1)
- Death (1)
- Decisions of the US Supreme Court (1)
- Discovery (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Civil Practice And Procedure, Hon. Jane Marum Roush
Civil Practice And Procedure, Hon. Jane Marum Roush
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Admissibility Of Written Standards As Evidence Of The Standard Of Care In Medical And Hospital Negligence Actions In Virginia, Gwen M. Schockemoehl
Admissibility Of Written Standards As Evidence Of The Standard Of Care In Medical And Hospital Negligence Actions In Virginia, Gwen M. Schockemoehl
University of Richmond Law Review
The standard of care in a medical negligence action represents the duty which the defendant physician, nurse, hospital or other health care provider owes to the patient. In Virginia, it is that degree of care and skill possessed by the reasonably prudent practitioner of the same specialty in this state. This standard is an elusive one at best. While learned treatises and journal articles assist in determining the standard, in practice the plaintiff offers experts who state, based on their knowledge, training, and experience that the standard of care requires the defendant to provide a particular type of care which …
Books Received
University of Richmond Law Review
These are the books received by the Law School in 1970.
Recent Legislation
University of Richmond Law Review
This is a summary of the legislation that came out in 1968.
Recent Cases
University of Richmond Law Review
This is a summary of the case law from 1967.
Recent Cases
University of Richmond Law Review
This is a summary of the case law from 1965.
Recent Cases
University of Richmond Law Review
This article provides a list of the recent cases and their summaries for the year of 1963.