Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (6)
- Criminal law (2)
- Discovery (2)
- Bias (1)
- Biomechanics (1)
-
- Blind spot (1)
- Clear and convincing evidence standard (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Dodd-frank (1)
- Eskin v. Carden (1)
- Expert testimony (1)
- Forensic evidence (1)
- Frye (1)
- Hindsight (1)
- North Carolina (1)
- Pre-discovery (1)
- Publicness (1)
- Risk management (1)
- Science and technology law (1)
- Smelser (1)
- Strickland (1)
- Testimentary freedom (1)
- Trusts and estates (1)
- Virginia (1)
- Wills (1)
- Wills law reform (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Reply To Miriam Baer And Michael Doucette’S Reviews Of Two Models Of Pre-Plea Discovery In Criminal Cases, Jenia I. Turner, Allison D. Redlich
Reply To Miriam Baer And Michael Doucette’S Reviews Of Two Models Of Pre-Plea Discovery In Criminal Cases, Jenia I. Turner, Allison D. Redlich
Washington and Lee Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
Virginia Prosecutors’ Response To Two Models Of Pre-Plea Discovery In Criminal Cases: An Empirical Comparison, Michael R. Doucette
Virginia Prosecutors’ Response To Two Models Of Pre-Plea Discovery In Criminal Cases: An Empirical Comparison, Michael R. Doucette
Washington and Lee Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
Diversifying To Mitigate Risk: Can Dodd–Frank Section 342 Help Stabilize The Financial Sector?, Kristin Johnson, Steven A. Ramirez, Cary Martin Shelby
Diversifying To Mitigate Risk: Can Dodd–Frank Section 342 Help Stabilize The Financial Sector?, Kristin Johnson, Steven A. Ramirez, Cary Martin Shelby
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Regulation Of Forensic Evidence, Brandon L. Garrett
Constitutional Regulation Of Forensic Evidence, Brandon L. Garrett
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Epigenetics And Toxic Torts: How Epidemiological Evidence Informs Causation, Kerriann Laubach
Epigenetics And Toxic Torts: How Epidemiological Evidence Informs Causation, Kerriann Laubach
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
How Sound Is The Science? Applying Daubert To Biomechanical Experts’ Injury Causation Opinions, Loren Peck
How Sound Is The Science? Applying Daubert To Biomechanical Experts’ Injury Causation Opinions, Loren Peck
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Adjudication, Error Correction, And Hindsight Blind Spots, Lisa Kern Griffin
Criminal Adjudication, Error Correction, And Hindsight Blind Spots, Lisa Kern Griffin
Washington and Lee Law Review
Concerns about hindsight in the law typically arise with regard to the bias that outcome knowledge can produce. But a more difficult problem than the clear view that hindsight appears to provide is the blind spot that it actually has. Because of the conventional wisdom about error review, there is a missed opportunity to ensure meaningful scrutiny. Beyond the confirmation biases that make convictions seem inevitable lies the question whether courts can see what they are meant to assess when they do look closely for error. Standards that require a retrospective showing of materiality, prejudice, or harm turn on what …
Irresolute Testators, Clear And Convicing Wills Law, Jane B. Baron
Irresolute Testators, Clear And Convicing Wills Law, Jane B. Baron
Washington and Lee Law Review
Controversial recent wills law reforms, embodied in new provisions of both the Uniform Probate Code and the Restatement of Property, excuse so-called harmless errors in will execution and permit judicial correction of erroneous terms in a will or trust. Both reforms pose evidentiary dangers, as proof of the error must come from outside the attested instrument and will be offered after the testator’s death. To respond to this concern, both the error and the testator’s true intent must be established by “clear and convincing” evidence. This Article is the first to examine how courts have applied the clear and convincing …