Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Privileged Communications Between Counsel And The Corporate Client, Robert G. Markey, Craig S. Bonnell
Privileged Communications Between Counsel And The Corporate Client, Robert G. Markey, Craig S. Bonnell
Cleveland State Law Review
At present inconsistent lower federal appellate court decisions governing the use of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine apply to the discovery of communications between counsel and the corporate client. Because of the distinctions that have developed in the application of the corporate attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine due to the unique factual settings in which the issues have arisen, prior case law may not be totally preempted by the Supreme Court decision in Upjohn. This article will explore some of these divergent opinions to determine the probable effect that the Court's decision in Upjohn will have upon communications between …
Privileged Communications Between Counsel And The Corporate Client, Robert G. Markey, Craig S. Bonnell
Privileged Communications Between Counsel And The Corporate Client, Robert G. Markey, Craig S. Bonnell
Cleveland State Law Review
At present inconsistent lower federal appellate court decisions governing the use of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine apply to the discovery of communications between counsel and the corporate client. Because of the distinctions that have developed in the application of the corporate attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine due to the unique factual settings in which the issues have arisen, prior case law may not be totally preempted by the Supreme Court decision in Upjohn. This article will explore some of these divergent opinions to determine the probable effect that the Court's decision in Upjohn will have upon communications between …
Two Suggested Reforms In Ohio's Discovery Procedure, Frank Seth Hurd
Two Suggested Reforms In Ohio's Discovery Procedure, Frank Seth Hurd
Cleveland State Law Review
Attorney's will agree that an injustice occurs whenever one party prevails in a court of law and another's rights are defeated but for knowledge of the relevant facts. Further, most will agree that some such injustice is inevitable in any judicial system, all such systems being subject to some degree of error. No one can deny the professional responsibility of all attorneys to work actively toward the reduction of such error. As numerous commentators have pointed out, injustice may also result from delay. It is equally the responsibility of the Bar to work toward the alleviation of that source of …