Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Procedure (4)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Courts (4)
- Criminal Procedure (4)
- Fourth Amendment (3)
-
- Litigation (3)
- Privacy Law (3)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Family Law (2)
- Medical Jurisprudence (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Computer Law (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Science and Technology Law (1)
- Social Welfare Law (1)
- Keyword
- Publication Year
Articles 1 - 27 of 27
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Intrinsic Evidence: Do Utah Prosecutors Too Often Neglect This Avenue Of Admissibility?, Blake R. Hills
Intrinsic Evidence: Do Utah Prosecutors Too Often Neglect This Avenue Of Admissibility?, Blake R. Hills
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
Intrinsic Evidence: Do Utah Prosecutors Too Often Neglect This Avenue Of Admissibility?
Intrinsic Evidence: Do Utah Prosecutors Too Often Neglect This Avenue Of Admissibility?
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
Defending The Preponderance Of The Evidence Standard In College Adjudications Of Sexual Assault, Amy Chmielewski
Defending The Preponderance Of The Evidence Standard In College Adjudications Of Sexual Assault, Amy Chmielewski
Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Privacy Rights Left Behind At The Border: The Exhaustive, Exploratory Searches Effectuated In United States V. Cotterman, Aaron Mcknight
Privacy Rights Left Behind At The Border: The Exhaustive, Exploratory Searches Effectuated In United States V. Cotterman, Aaron Mcknight
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
No Longer The Right To Remain Silent: Cross-Examining Forensic Analyst Testimony, Casey Unwin
No Longer The Right To Remain Silent: Cross-Examining Forensic Analyst Testimony, Casey Unwin
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Juror Testimony Of Racial Bias In Jury Deliberations: United States V. Benally And The Obstacle Of Federal Rule Of Evidence 606(B) , Brandon C. Pond
Juror Testimony Of Racial Bias In Jury Deliberations: United States V. Benally And The Obstacle Of Federal Rule Of Evidence 606(B) , Brandon C. Pond
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Excluding The Exclusionary Rule: Extending The Rationale Of Hudson V. Michigan To Evidence Seized During Unauthorized Nighttime Searches, Jeffiy R. Gittins
Excluding The Exclusionary Rule: Extending The Rationale Of Hudson V. Michigan To Evidence Seized During Unauthorized Nighttime Searches, Jeffiy R. Gittins
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fixing The Constable's Blunder: Can One Trial Judge In One County In One State Nudge A Nation Beyond The Exclusionary Rule?, H. Mitchell Caldwell
Fixing The Constable's Blunder: Can One Trial Judge In One County In One State Nudge A Nation Beyond The Exclusionary Rule?, H. Mitchell Caldwell
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reporter's Privilege In Utah, Edward L. Carter
Reporter's Privilege In Utah, Edward L. Carter
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
Establishing The Standard For A Physician's Patient Diagnosis Using Scientific Evidence: Dealing With The Split Of Authority Amongst The Circuit Courts Of Appeal, Jack E. Karns
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
The Character Evidence Rule Revisited, Kenneth J. Melilli
The Character Evidence Rule Revisited, Kenneth J. Melilli
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Inevitable Discovery Doctrine Today: The Demands Of The Fourth Amendment, Nix, And Murray, And The Disagreement Among The Federal Circuits, Troy E. Golden
The Inevitable Discovery Doctrine Today: The Demands Of The Fourth Amendment, Nix, And Murray, And The Disagreement Among The Federal Circuits, Troy E. Golden
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
The Epistemology Of Admissibility: Why Even Good Philosophy Of Science Would Not Make For Good Philosophy Of Evidence, Brian Leiter
The Epistemology Of Admissibility: Why Even Good Philosophy Of Science Would Not Make For Good Philosophy Of Evidence, Brian Leiter
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Misapplication Of Daubert: Compton V. Subaru Of America Opens The Gate For Unreliable And Irrelevant Expert Testimony, Jonathan R. Schofield
A Misapplication Of Daubert: Compton V. Subaru Of America Opens The Gate For Unreliable And Irrelevant Expert Testimony, Jonathan R. Schofield
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Advocate's Conflicting Obligations Vis-A.-Vis Adverse Medical Evidence In Social Security Proceedings, Robert E. Rains
The Advocate's Conflicting Obligations Vis-A.-Vis Adverse Medical Evidence In Social Security Proceedings, Robert E. Rains
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Are You My Mother? The Scientific And Legal Validity Of Conventional Blood Testing And Dna Fingerprinting To Establish Proof Of Parentage In Immigration Cases, Alan R. Davis
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
A New Antidote For An Opponent's Pretrial Discovery Misconduct: Treating The Misconduct At Trial As An Admission By Conduct Of The Weakness Of The Opponent's Case, Edward J. Imwinkelried
A New Antidote For An Opponent's Pretrial Discovery Misconduct: Treating The Misconduct At Trial As An Admission By Conduct Of The Weakness Of The Opponent's Case, Edward J. Imwinkelried
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Payne V. Tennessee: The Supreme Court Places Its Stamp Of Approval On The Use Of "Victim Impact Evidence" During Capital Sentencing Proceedings, Stephen M. Sargent
Payne V. Tennessee: The Supreme Court Places Its Stamp Of Approval On The Use Of "Victim Impact Evidence" During Capital Sentencing Proceedings, Stephen M. Sargent
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Maryland V. Craig: Ignoring The Letter And Purpose Of The Confrontation Clause, Anthony S. Parise
Maryland V. Craig: Ignoring The Letter And Purpose Of The Confrontation Clause, Anthony S. Parise
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Hobgoblin Of The Federal Rules Of Evidence: An Analysis Of Rule 801(D)(1)(B), Prior Consistent Statements And A New Proposal, Edward D. Ohlbaum
The Hobgoblin Of The Federal Rules Of Evidence: An Analysis Of Rule 801(D)(1)(B), Prior Consistent Statements And A New Proposal, Edward D. Ohlbaum
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Closing The "Open Fields" Question: Oliver V. United States, Brian K. Jorgensen
Closing The "Open Fields" Question: Oliver V. United States, Brian K. Jorgensen
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fairness Vs. Trustworthiness: The Predecessor In Interest Controversy Of Rule 804(B)(L), Allen D. Haynie
Fairness Vs. Trustworthiness: The Predecessor In Interest Controversy Of Rule 804(B)(L), Allen D. Haynie
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
From The Mouths Of Babes: Does The Constitutional Right Of Privacy Mandate A Parent-Child Privilege?
From The Mouths Of Babes: Does The Constitutional Right Of Privacy Mandate A Parent-Child Privilege?
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Evidence-Newsman's Privilege-Legislatively Enacted Newsman's Privilege Invalid As Infringement On Judicial Rulemaking Power-Ammerman V. Hub Bard Broadcasting, Inc.
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Symposium: The Use Of Videotape In The Courtroom, Tom C. Clark
Symposium: The Use Of Videotape In The Courtroom, Tom C. Clark
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Effects Of Videotape Testimony In Jury Trials: Studies On Juror Decision Making, Information Retention, And Emotional Arousal, Gerald R. Miller, David C. Bender, Frank Boster, B. Thomas Florence, Norman Fontes, John Hocking, Henry Nicholson
The Effects Of Videotape Testimony In Jury Trials: Studies On Juror Decision Making, Information Retention, And Emotional Arousal, Gerald R. Miller, David C. Bender, Frank Boster, B. Thomas Florence, Norman Fontes, John Hocking, Henry Nicholson
BYU Law Review
Summary of Contents
I. Introduction: The Nature of the Research
II. Group I : The Nugent u. Clark Studies
A. Background
1. Selecting the stimulus trial
2. Editing the transcript
3. Preparing the trial
a. Casting
b. Equipment
B. Nugent u. Clark Study
1 : live v. videotape trials 1. Questions examined
2. Procedures
a. The live presentation
b. The videotape presentation
c. The questionnaire
3. Results and discussion
a. Negligence verdicts and mean awards
b. Juror perception of attorney credibility
c. Juror information retention
d. Juror interest and motivation
4. Conclusions from Study 1
C. Nugent u. Clark Study …
An Assessment Of Videotape In The Criminal Courts, Ernest H. Short, B. Thomas Florence, Mary Alice Marsh
An Assessment Of Videotape In The Criminal Courts, Ernest H. Short, B. Thomas Florence, Mary Alice Marsh
BYU Law Review
Summary of Contents
I. Introduction
A. A brief history of television and videotape in the justice system
B. Recent studies of videotape technology in the justice system
C. Overview of the goals and methodology of the present study
II. The Videotape System
A. The recording environment
1. Lighting
2. Spatial arrangement
3. Participant mobility
4. Acoustics
5. Electrical power
B. Production techniques
1. Video source location
2. Audio source location
3. Picture composition
a. Zooms
b. Varying video sources
c. Special effects
C. Alternative equipment combinations
1. System 1 : the single camera
2. System 2: the single camera with …