Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (2)
- Testimony (2)
- Dead man statute (1)
- Disqualification (1)
- Eavesdropper (1)
-
- Evidence code (1)
- Expert testimony (1)
- Florida (1)
- Florida Dead Man's Statute (1)
- Husband wife privilege (1)
- Interested witness (1)
- Law (1)
- Opinions (1)
- Oral communications (1)
- Pecuniary interest (1)
- Privileged communication (1)
- Reason to know (1)
- Spousal privilege (1)
- Testify (1)
- Third-party presence (1)
- Trial by battle (1)
- Trial by oath (1)
- Trial by ordeal (1)
- Witness (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Using Leading Questions During Direct Examination, Charles W. Ehrhardt, Stephanie J. Young
Using Leading Questions During Direct Examination, Charles W. Ehrhardt, Stephanie J. Young
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Conflict Concerning Expert Witness And Legal Conclusions, Charles W. Ehrhardt
The Conflict Concerning Expert Witness And Legal Conclusions, Charles W. Ehrhardt
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
The Dead Man's Statute Before And After The Florida Evidence Code -- A Step In The Right Direction, Linda Jones Wells
The Dead Man's Statute Before And After The Florida Evidence Code -- A Step In The Right Direction, Linda Jones Wells
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proffitt V. State, 315 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 1975), Elaine Kay Freemyer
Proffitt V. State, 315 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 1975), Elaine Kay Freemyer
Florida State University Law Review
Evidence- HUSBAND-WIFE PRIVILEGE- TESTIMONY OF THIRD PARTY EAVESDROPPER CONCERNING PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION ADMISSIBLE WHERE PRIVILEGED PARTY KNOWS OR HAS REASON TO KNOW OF EAVESDROPPER'S PRESENCE.