Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Americans with Disabilities Act (3)
- Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett (2)
- Federalism (2)
- Sovereign immunity (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
-
- Accommodations (1)
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act (1)
- Authority (1)
- Disability law (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Discrimination against people with disabilities (1)
- Disparate treatment (1)
- Employment law (1)
- Golf (1)
- Handicap discrimination (1)
- Legitimacy (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Disability Law
Constitutional Doctrine As Paring Tool: The Struggle For "Relevant" Evidence In University Of Alabama V. Garrett, Pamela Brandwein
Constitutional Doctrine As Paring Tool: The Struggle For "Relevant" Evidence In University Of Alabama V. Garrett, Pamela Brandwein
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Article examines the difficulties involved in translating the social model of disability into the idiom of constitutional law. The immediate focus is University of Alabama v. Garrett. Both parts of this Article consider how disability rights claims collide with a discourse of legitimacy in constitutional law. Part I focuses on the arguments presented in several major Briefs filed in support of Garrett. Constitutional doctrines are conceived as paring tools and it is shown how the Court used these doctrines to easily pare down the body of evidence Garrett's lawyers sought to claim as relevant in justifying the ADA …
The Imperial Sovereign: Sovereign Immunity & The Ada, Judith Olans Brown, Wendy E. Parmet
The Imperial Sovereign: Sovereign Immunity & The Ada, Judith Olans Brown, Wendy E. Parmet
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Professors Brown and Parmet examine the impact of the Supreme Court's resurrection of state sovereign immunity on the rights of individuals protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act in light of the recent decision, Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett. Placing Garrett within the context of the Rehnquist Court's evolving reallocation of state and federal authority, they argue that the Court has relied upon a mythic and dangerous notion of sovereignty that is foreign to the Framers' understanding. Brown and Parmet go on to show that, by determining that federalism compels constraining congressional power to …
Litigating Age And Disability Claims Against State And Local Government Employers In The New "Federalism" Era, Ivan E. Bodensteiner, Rosalie Levinson
Litigating Age And Disability Claims Against State And Local Government Employers In The New "Federalism" Era, Ivan E. Bodensteiner, Rosalie Levinson
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Driving Into The Rough: Conflicting Decisions On The Rights Of Disabled Golfers In Martin V. Pga Tour, Inc. And Olinger V. United States Golf Ass'n, Steven A. Holzbaur
Driving Into The Rough: Conflicting Decisions On The Rights Of Disabled Golfers In Martin V. Pga Tour, Inc. And Olinger V. United States Golf Ass'n, Steven A. Holzbaur
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.