Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (1)
- Antiabortion (1)
- Conception (1)
- Department of Health and Human Services (1)
- Disability (1)
-
- Embryos (1)
- Fertilization (1)
- Fetal pain (1)
- Gender (1)
- Legal personhood (1)
- Personhood (1)
- Pregancy Discrimination Act; Parental Leave; Parental Leave Policy; Title VII; Men; Parental Leave for Men; Title VII Claim; EEOC; Parental Bonding Leave; Employment Discrimination; Pregnancy-Related Disability Leave; Childbirth; Estee Lauder; JP Morgan; Family Medical Leave Act; Disability Period; Caregiver Leave; Primary Caregiver; Secondary Caregiver (1)
- Race (1)
- Reproductive medicine (1)
- Reproductive research (1)
- Sanctity of Human Life Act (1)
- Zygotes (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Disability Law
Dads Are Parents, Too: Why Amending The Pregnancy Discrimination Act Is Necessary For Courts To Determine If A Parental Leave Policy Violates Title Vii, Krista Gay
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
To attract millennials desiring a work-life balance, large companies have begun to offer new parent leave to both male and female employees and commonly offer longer leave to women than men. Although a company may offer pregnancy disability leave to women without offering similar leave to men, if the company classifies the leave as parental bonding leave, it must be offered equally. If it is not, as highlighted by recent lawsuits against JP Morgan and Estée Lauder, a Title VII claim can arise. Historically, courts have had difficulty deciding if such a policy does in fact violate Title VII, because …
When Courts Run Amuck: A Book Review Of Unequal: How America's Courts Undermine Discrimination Law By Sandra F. Sperino And Suja A. Thomas (Oxford 2017), Theresa M. Beiner
When Courts Run Amuck: A Book Review Of Unequal: How America's Courts Undermine Discrimination Law By Sandra F. Sperino And Suja A. Thomas (Oxford 2017), Theresa M. Beiner
Texas A&M Law Review
In Unequal: How America’s Courts Undermine Discrimination Law (“Unequal”), law professors Sandra F. Sperino and Suja A. Thomas provide a point-by-point analysis of how the federal courts’ interpretations of federal anti-discrimination laws have undermined their efficacy to provide relief to workers whose employers have allegedly engaged in discrimination. The cases’ results are consistently pro-employer, even while the Supreme Court of the United States—a court not known for being particularly pro-plaintiff—has occasionally ruled in favor of plaintiff employees. The authors suggest some reasons for this apparent anti-plaintiff bias among the federal courts, although they do not settle on a particular reason …
Personhood Seeking New Life With Republican Control, Jonathan F. Will, I. Glenn Cohen, Eli Y. Adashi
Personhood Seeking New Life With Republican Control, Jonathan F. Will, I. Glenn Cohen, Eli Y. Adashi
Indiana Law Journal
Just three days prior to the inauguration of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States, Representative Jody B. Hice (R-GA) introduced the Sanctity of Human Life Act (H.R. 586), which, if enacted, would provide that the rights associated with legal personhood begin at fertilization. Then, in October 2017, the Department of Health and Human Services released its draft strategic plan, which identifies a core policy of protecting Americans at every stage of life, beginning at conception. While often touted as a means to outlaw abortion, protecting the “lives” of single-celled zygotes may also have implications for the practice …
Index: Sports Law In Law Reviews And Journals, Jordan Lysiak
Index: Sports Law In Law Reviews And Journals, Jordan Lysiak
Marquette Sports Law Review
None
Article 6 – Women With Disabilities, Roxanne Mykitiuk, Ena Chadha
Article 6 – Women With Disabilities, Roxanne Mykitiuk, Ena Chadha
Articles & Book Chapters
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (‘CRPD’ or ‘Convention’) is a milestone achievement for women and girls with disabilities, with its inclusion of a gender-sensitive approach and Article 6, which speaks directly to gender-disability discrimination. Prior to the CRPD, most international human rights instruments failed to address both disability and gender in their provisions. Many instruments were attuned to either gender to the exclusion of disability, or disability to the exclusion of gender. The recognition of the unique experiences of gender and disability-based discrimination animates the spirit behind several of the CPRD’s provisions and, specifically, the content …