Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative Procedures Act (1)
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (1)
- Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 (1)
- Black Lung Benefits Amendments of 1981 (1)
-
- Black Lung Benefits Reform Act of 1977 (1)
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. (1)
- Bragdon v. Abbott (1)
- Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. (1)
- Cigarettes (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Coal dust (1)
- Doris Coal v. Director (1)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1)
- Federal Coal Mine Health Safety Act of 1969 (1)
- Fourth Circuit (1)
- Interpretive Guidance (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Medical treatment (1)
- Miner (1)
- Pneumoconiosis (1)
- Pulmonary disorder (1)
- Rehabilitation Act (1)
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co. (1)
- Smoking (1)
- Statutory presumption (1)
- Sutton v. United Air Lines (1)
- Title I (1)
- Title VII (1)
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Disability Law
Reducing The Overburden: The Doris Coal Presumption And Administrative Efficiency Under The Black Lung Benefits Act, Eric R. Olson
Reducing The Overburden: The Doris Coal Presumption And Administrative Efficiency Under The Black Lung Benefits Act, Eric R. Olson
Michigan Law Review
Coal dust build-up prevents many coal miners' lungs from functioning properly. This condition, commonly referred to as black lung or pneumoconiosis, can make common activities nearly impossible. The Black Lung Benefits Act covers the cost of medical treatment for many affected miners, though procedural impediments often prevent miners from receiving care. The miner's current or former employer, when identifiable, must pay for medical care relating to the miner's black lung. Most disputes over miners' claims for medical care arise when the miner has a history of cigarette smoking and the need for medical care could arise from either coal dust …
Deference And Disability Discrimination, Rebecca Hanner White
Deference And Disability Discrimination, Rebecca Hanner White
Michigan Law Review
For thirty-five years, the civil rights community has paid scant attention to administrative law principles. Those interested in advancing on-the-job equality for this country's working men and women (or in preserving employer autonomy vis-a-vis federal encroachment) have all but ignored what many consider the arcane technicalities of administrative law. This state of affairs is strange when one considers that administration and enforcement of each of our major federal laws outlawing employment discrimination have been confided to an administrative agency, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"). The EEOC, however, has historically been given short shrift by litigants and by the judiciary. …