Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (109)
- Constitutional Law (34)
- Courts (28)
- Evidence (26)
- Law and Society (15)
-
- Legal History (15)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (14)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (13)
- Litigation (12)
- Law and Politics (11)
- Legal Profession (11)
- Fourth Amendment (10)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (10)
- Legislation (10)
- Supreme Court of the United States (10)
- Civil Procedure (9)
- Judges (9)
- Jurisprudence (9)
- International Law (7)
- Human Rights Law (6)
- Law and Race (6)
- Other Law (6)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (6)
- Science and Technology Law (6)
- Civil Law (5)
- Conflict of Laws (5)
- Juvenile Law (5)
- Law and Economics (5)
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (18)
- William & Mary Law School (14)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (13)
- University of Richmond (13)
- University of San Diego (13)
-
- BLR (12)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (7)
- Columbia Law School (6)
- Cornell University Law School (5)
- Mercer University School of Law (5)
- SelectedWorks (5)
- Fordham Law School (4)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (3)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (3)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Law and Procedure (23)
- Criminal procedure (11)
- Criminal Procedure (10)
- Criminal law (7)
- Evidence (7)
-
- Trial (7)
- United States Supreme Court (7)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Criminal justice (6)
- Famous Trials (6)
- Jurisprudence (6)
- Sentencing (6)
- Sixth Amendment (6)
- Privacy (5)
- Race (5)
- Testimony (5)
- Admissibility (4)
- Confrontation Clause (4)
- Crawford v. Washington (4)
- Cross-examination (4)
- Death penalty (4)
- Fourth amendment (4)
- General Law (4)
- Hearsay (4)
- Innocence (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Plea bargaining (4)
- Search and seizure (4)
- Capital Punishment (3)
- Capital punishment (3)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (20)
- Articles (12)
- San Diego Law Review (12)
- University of Richmond Law Review (12)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (11)
-
- ExpressO (9)
- All Faculty Scholarship (7)
- Faculty Works (7)
- William & Mary Law Review (6)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Mercer Law Review (5)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (5)
- Washington Law Review (4)
- Evangeline Sarda (3)
- Felipe Marín Verdugo (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers (3)
- Steven L. Chanenson (3)
- BYU Law Review (2)
- Edward Ivan Cueva (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Malinda L. Seymore (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Stephen E Henderson (2)
- Working Paper Series (2)
- Alexandra Natapoff (1)
- All Faculty Publications (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 186
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure. Rule 55 – Default Judgement, Robert Bloom
Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure. Rule 55 – Default Judgement, Robert Bloom
Robert Bloom
No abstract provided.
Summary Of Hidalgo V. District Court, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. 59, Barbra E. Zess
Summary Of Hidalgo V. District Court, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. 59, Barbra E. Zess
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Luis Hidalgo III and Anabel Espindola, awaiting a capital murder trial, made a petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging the alleged aggravating circumstances (solicitation to commit murder) as not being “a felony involving the use or threat of violence to the person of another,” as required by NRS 200.033(2)(b). The other aggravator, murder to receive money, was successfully challenged as violating SCR 250(4)(c) requirements.
Statistics In The Jury Box: How Jurors Respond To Mitochondrial Dna Match Probabilities, David H. Kaye, Valerie P. Hans, B. Michael Dann, Erin J. Farley, Stephanie Albertson
Statistics In The Jury Box: How Jurors Respond To Mitochondrial Dna Match Probabilities, David H. Kaye, Valerie P. Hans, B. Michael Dann, Erin J. Farley, Stephanie Albertson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
This article describes parts of an unusually realistic experiment on the comprehension of expert testimony on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequencing in a criminal trial for robbery. Specifically, we examine how jurors who responded to summonses for jury duty evaluated portions of videotaped testimony involving probabilities and statistics. Although some jurors showed susceptibility to classic fallacies in interpreting conditional probabilities, the jurors as a whole were not overwhelmed by a 99.98% exclusion probability that the prosecution presented. Cognitive errors favoring the defense were more prevalent than ones favoring the prosecution. These findings lend scant support to the legal argument that mtDNA …
Be They Fish Or Not Fish: The Fishy Registration Of Nonsexual Offenders, Ofer Raban
Be They Fish Or Not Fish: The Fishy Registration Of Nonsexual Offenders, Ofer Raban
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Death Penalty Law, Therese M. Day
Death Penalty Law, Therese M. Day
Mercer Law Review
This Article provides a survey of death penalty case law in Georgia from June 1, 2006 through May 31, 2007. The cases include those that were heard by the Georgia Supreme Court on interim appeal and direct appeal,1 and discussion is limited to claims which present new issues of law, refine existing law, or are otherwise instructive. This Article does not discuss holdings in capital cases that are common to all criminal appeals because these are discussed elsewhere in this Survey.
Summary Of Wilson V. State Of Nevada, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 54, Tanya Gaylord
Summary Of Wilson V. State Of Nevada, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 54, Tanya Gaylord
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
No abstract provided.
What Is A Business Crime?, Richard A. Booth
What Is A Business Crime?, Richard A. Booth
Working Paper Series
Criminal prosecution has been used with increasing frequency recently in connection with a variety of business failures and other financial offenses. Indeed, it appears that there are few such offenses that cannot be prosecuted criminally even though they also give rise to civil remedies. While some such offenses seem to be quite serious frauds, others seem to be as minor as getting the accounting rules wrong. Thus, the question addressed in this essay is how to define a business crime and what should be the proper role of criminal prosecution in connection with business offenses. I start with the proposition …
Rethinking Dui Law In Virginia, Monte Kuligowski
Rethinking Dui Law In Virginia, Monte Kuligowski
University of Richmond Law Review
As the demand for safer roadways needs little supporting argument, I turn to the constitutional problem of strict criminal liability law, followed with a brief analysis of criminal intent and strict liability law within the criminal system, some examples of how other states have responded to the inherent tensions, and a few specific thoughts for the legislature to consider.
Has A New Day Dawned For Indigent Defense In Virginia?, Robert E. Shepherd Jr.
Has A New Day Dawned For Indigent Defense In Virginia?, Robert E. Shepherd Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Raise The Proof: A Default Rule For Indigent Defense, Adam M. Gershowitz
Raise The Proof: A Default Rule For Indigent Defense, Adam M. Gershowitz
Faculty Publications
Almost everyone agrees that indigent defense in America is underfunded, but workable solutions have been hard to come by. For the most part, courts have been unwilling to inject themselves into legislative budget decisions. And, when courts have become involved and issued favorable decisions, the benefits have been only temporary because once the pressure of litigation disappears so does a legislature's desire to appropriate more funding. This Article proposes that if an indigent defense system is under-funded, the state supreme court should impose a default rule raising the standard of proof to "beyond all doubt" to convict indigent defendants. The …
Pro Se Litigation: Best Practices From A Judge's Perspective, Hon. Beverly W. Snukals, Glen H. Sturtevant Jr.
Pro Se Litigation: Best Practices From A Judge's Perspective, Hon. Beverly W. Snukals, Glen H. Sturtevant Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law And Procedure, Marla G. Decker, Stephen R. Mccullough Jr.
Criminal Law And Procedure, Marla G. Decker, Stephen R. Mccullough Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
The authors have endeavored to select from the many appellate cases those that have the most significant precedential value. The article also outlines some of the most consequential changes tothe law enacted by the Virginia General Assembly in the areas ofcriminal law and procedure.
The Price Of Misdemeanor Representation, Erica J. Hashimoto
The Price Of Misdemeanor Representation, Erica J. Hashimoto
William & Mary Law Review
Nobody disputes either the reality of excessive caseloads in indigent defense systems or their negative effects. More than forty years after Gideon v. Wainwright, however, few seem willing to accept that additional resources will not magically appear to solve the problem. Rather, concerned observers demand more funds while state and local legislators resist those entreaties in the face of political resistance and pressures to balance government budgets. Recognizing that indigent defense systems must operate in a world of limited resources, states should reduce the number of cases streaming into those systems by significantly curtailing the appointment of counsel in low-level …
"You Fall Into Scylla In Seeking To Avoid Charybdis": The Second Circuit's Pragmatic Approach To Supervised Release For Sex Offenders, Frank E. Correll Jr.
"You Fall Into Scylla In Seeking To Avoid Charybdis": The Second Circuit's Pragmatic Approach To Supervised Release For Sex Offenders, Frank E. Correll Jr.
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Summary Of Dewey V. State, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 47, Nevada Law Journal
Summary Of Dewey V. State, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 47, Nevada Law Journal
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
No abstract provided.
Statement Of Steven L. Chanenson Before The United States Sentencing Commission Regarding Retroactivity Of Crack Guidelines Amendments, Steven Chanenson
Statement Of Steven L. Chanenson Before The United States Sentencing Commission Regarding Retroactivity Of Crack Guidelines Amendments, Steven Chanenson
Steven L. Chanenson
No abstract provided.
Summary Of Ryan V. Dist. Ct., 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 42, Katie Maw
Summary Of Ryan V. Dist. Ct., 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 42, Katie Maw
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court’s order denying petitioner’s motion to substitute counsel.
The Case Of The Crooked Convictions: Erle Stanley Gardner, Perry Mason, And The Court Of Last Resort, Malinda Seymore
The Case Of The Crooked Convictions: Erle Stanley Gardner, Perry Mason, And The Court Of Last Resort, Malinda Seymore
Malinda L. Seymore
Race And Recalcitrance: The Miller-El Remands, Sheri Johnson
Race And Recalcitrance: The Miller-El Remands, Sheri Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
In Batson v. Kentucky, the Supreme Court held that a prosecutor may not peremptorily challenge a juror based upon his or her race. Although Baston was decided more than twenty years ago, some lower courts still resist its command. Three recent cases provide particularly egregious examples of that resistance. The Fifth Circuit refused the Supreme Court's instruction in Miller-El v. Cockrell, necessitating a second grant of certiorari in Miller-El v. Dretke. The court then reversed and remanded four lower court cases for reconsideration in light of Miller-El, but in two cases the lower courts have thus …
Sentencing Acquitted Conduct To The Post-Booker Dustbin, James J. Bilsborrow
Sentencing Acquitted Conduct To The Post-Booker Dustbin, James J. Bilsborrow
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Summary Of Witherow V. State, Bd. Of Parole Comm’Rs, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 33, Tyler Ure
Summary Of Witherow V. State, Bd. Of Parole Comm’Rs, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 33, Tyler Ure
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
This case is an appeal from a district court order dismissing a complaint that challenged a parole board proceeding under Nevada’s Open Meeting Law.‡Ìq
Summary Of Nay V. State, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 35, Tyler James Watson
Summary Of Nay V. State, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 35, Tyler James Watson
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a judgment of conviction, upon a jury verdict, of first-degree murder with the use of a deadly weapon and robbery with the use of a deadly weapon.
Criminal Law's "Mediating Rules": Balancing, Harmonization, Or Accident?, Michael T. Cahill
Criminal Law's "Mediating Rules": Balancing, Harmonization, Or Accident?, Michael T. Cahill
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Civil Disobedience And The Necessity Defense, John Alan Cohan
Civil Disobedience And The Necessity Defense, John Alan Cohan
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] “This article will first examine the nature of civil disobedience, and distinguish between direct and indirect civil disobedience. Part II highlights some historical examples of civil disobedience. Part IV then examines the principles of the necessity defense, analyzing each of the elements that make up the defense, illustrated with cases on point. Next, Part V will turn to an analysis of several abortion-protest cases that raise issues different from other types of civil disobedience cases. Part VI then will examine Viet Nam era civil disobedience cases. Following that, Part VIII will explore a unique defense known as the Nuremberg …
The Eighth Amendment, The Death Penalty And Ordinary Robbery-Burglary Murderers: A California Case Study, Steven Shatz
The Eighth Amendment, The Death Penalty And Ordinary Robbery-Burglary Murderers: A California Case Study, Steven Shatz
Steven F. Shatz
Fitness For Trial In The District Court: The Legal Perspective, Darius Whelan
Fitness For Trial In The District Court: The Legal Perspective, Darius Whelan
Darius Whelan
Clínica De Justicia Criminal Udp Presenta Recurso De Nulidad, Felipe Marín
Clínica De Justicia Criminal Udp Presenta Recurso De Nulidad, Felipe Marín
Felipe Marín Verdugo
No abstract provided.
Summary Of Gallegos V. State, 123 Nev. Advanced Opinion 31, Matthew Engle
Summary Of Gallegos V. State, 123 Nev. Advanced Opinion 31, Matthew Engle
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appellant Albert Gallegos was charged under NRS 202.360(1)(b),2 in 2004, with one count of unlawful possession of a firearm after police arrested him at his home in Clark County and found a firearm inside that home. That charge was based on a 1998 felony warrant issued by a California superior court. The California court issued the warrant when Gallegos failed to appear for sentencing after pleading nolo contendere to seven felony charges. At his Nevada trial, Gallegos testified that he did not appear for his sentencing hearing because the California superior court told him when he entered his plea that …
Summary Of State V. Ruscetta, Nev. Adv. Op. No. 32, Krystallin Hernandez
Summary Of State V. Ruscetta, Nev. Adv. Op. No. 32, Krystallin Hernandez
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a district court’s order granting a defendant’s motion to suppress evidence found by a Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Officer during a consensual vehicle search.
Introduction To The Third Criminal Procedure Discussion Forum, Russell L. Weaver
Introduction To The Third Criminal Procedure Discussion Forum, Russell L. Weaver
San Diego Law Review
The Third Criminal Procedure Discussion Forum was held at the University of Louisville's Brandeis School of Law on December 14, 2006. As with prior fora, the goal of this forum was to bring together a small group of prominent criminal procedure scholars to discuss matters of common interest. This year's forum focused on two topics: "confessions jurisprudence" and "the most underrated criminal procedure decision(s)."