Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Recidivism (2)
- Applicability of due process to juvenile proceedings (1)
- Associate Justice (1)
- COMPAS (1)
- Carlos Cadena (1)
-
- Cesare Beccaria (1)
- Commonwealth v. Fisher (1)
- Condemnation (1)
- Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (1)
- Criminal sentencing (1)
- Criminal-civil dichotomy (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Delinquency proceedings (1)
- Deter (1)
- Deter crime (1)
- Deterrence (1)
- Deterrent (1)
- Development of juvenile proceedings (1)
- District Courts (1)
- Due process reforms for juvenile proceedings. (1)
- Duncan v. Louisiana (1)
- Economic model deterrence (1)
- Emile Durkheim (1)
- Extralegal deterrent (1)
- Fourth Court of Civil Appeals (1)
- Gallegos v. Colorado (1)
- George Kelling (1)
- Gregg v. Georgia (1)
- Incapacitation (1)
- Judge Posner (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Texas Juvenile Justice: The Need For A “Second Look” At Juvenile Prison Sentences, Kyle Jenkins
Texas Juvenile Justice: The Need For A “Second Look” At Juvenile Prison Sentences, Kyle Jenkins
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Deterrence, David Crump
Due Process And The Juvenile Offender., Carlos Cadena
Due Process And The Juvenile Offender., Carlos Cadena
St. Mary's Law Journal
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proceedings. The goal of the juvenile court movement was to establish systems of education and protection of errant children, rather than deterrence and retribution. To accomplish these results, the juvenile court was shorn of all resemblance to criminal courts. Public hearings were to be avoided and the intervention of counsel was not required, since the juvenile judge represented both the child and the state. However, it became clear that children were receiving the protection of the state because they engaged in criminal conduct and with little …