Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Intellectual property (3)
- Civil procedure (2)
- Federal Circuit (2)
- Patent (2)
- America Invents Act (1)
-
- Brandeis (1)
- Business Organizations (1)
- CAFC (1)
- Certainty (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Congress (1)
- Courts (1)
- Defendants (1)
- District court (1)
- Due process (1)
- Empirical (1)
- En banc (1)
- Erie (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Finality (1)
- Formalism (1)
- Forum shopping (1)
- Handbook (1)
- IP (1)
- Infringement of patents (1)
- Institution (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Newspapers (1)
- PTAB (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Civil Procedure
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Consequences For Patent Owners If A Patent Is Unconstitutionally Invalidated By The Patent Trial And Appeal Board, Mark Magas
Chicago-Kent Law Review
There have been many constitutional challenges against the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) since it was created by the America Invents Act in 2011. While the merits of these challenges have been widely debated, there has been little analysis of what would happen if one of these challenges succeeded and patents are found to have been unconstitutionally invalidated. This note examines how issues with waiver, retroactivity, and finality may prevent patent owners from getting their patent rights back, considering the type of constitutional challenge and the different stages of the PTAB process. While the odds are stacked against patent …
The Procedure Of Patent Eligibility, Paul Gugliuzza
The Procedure Of Patent Eligibility, Paul Gugliuzza
Faculty Scholarship
A decade ago, the patent-eligible subject matter requirement was defunct. Several recent Supreme Court decisions, however, have made eligibility the most important issue in many patent cases. To date, debates over the resurgent doctrine have focused mainly on its substance. Critics contend that the Supreme Court’s case law makes patents too easy to invalidate and discourages innovation. Supporters emphasize that the Court’s decisions help eradicate the overly broad patents often asserted by so-called patent trolls.
Yet one important consequence of eligibility’s revival has been procedural. Because district courts often view eligibility to present a pure question of law, they are—for …
Social Media, Manipulation, And Violence, Allyson Haynes Stuart
Social Media, Manipulation, And Violence, Allyson Haynes Stuart
South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business
No abstract provided.
Amended Rules, Amended Pleadings: How The Abrogation Of Form 18 Politicized Direct Infringement Patent Pleading, Nick Baniel
Amended Rules, Amended Pleadings: How The Abrogation Of Form 18 Politicized Direct Infringement Patent Pleading, Nick Baniel
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
Since the abrogation of Form 18, the template for pleading direct infringement of patents, district courts have struggled to assess exactly what a plaintiff must assert in pleadings to survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. In place of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 84, courts have developed multiple standards to assess pleading sufficiency. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has provided little guidance when given the opportunity to resolve this division, leaving uncertainty for litigants and judges. Using data collected from opinions on motions to dismiss during 2016 and 2017, this Note …
The Federal Circuit As An Institution, Ryan G. Vacca
The Federal Circuit As An Institution, Ryan G. Vacca
Law Faculty Scholarship
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is a unique institution. Unlike other circuit courts, the Federal Circuit’s jurisdiction is bound by subject area rather than geography, and it was created to address a unique set of problems specific to patent law. These characteristics have affected its institutional development and made the court one of the most frequently studied appellate courts. This chapter examines this development and describes the evolving qualities that have helped the Federal Circuit distinguish itself, for better or worse, as an institution.
This chapter begins with an overview of the concerns existing before creation of …
Brandeis’S I.P. Federalism: Thoughts On Erie At Eighty, Joseph S. Miller
Brandeis’S I.P. Federalism: Thoughts On Erie At Eighty, Joseph S. Miller
Scholarly Works
Justice Brandeis is, in intellectual property law’s precincts, most famous for his lone dissent in International News Service v. Associate Press, the misappropriation case one can find in virtually every i.p. survey casebook (and many property law casebooks as well). But in the wider legal world, Brandeis is likely most famous for his earthquake opinion in Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins. Do Brandeis’s opinions in these two cases speak to each other? Can considering them together inform broader reflections on the texture of our federalism in the i.p. context? This piece, prepared in connection with an “Erie at Eighty” conference …