Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Inc. v. Comer; Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar (1)
- Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission; Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue; Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia (1)
- Ninth Circuit; protective order; First Amendment; litigation; public policy; more than tangential; Center for Auto Safety; motion to seal; court records; open proceedings; open court; right to know; public access (1)
- Roberts Court; Politics; Legitimacy; State Courts; State Constitutions; institutions; Supreme Court; Liberal; Conservative; Judicial Review; Masterpiece Cakeshop (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Civil Procedure
The Roberts Court, State Courts, And State Constitutions: Judicial Role Shopping, Ariel L. Bendor, Joshua Segev
The Roberts Court, State Courts, And State Constitutions: Judicial Role Shopping, Ariel L. Bendor, Joshua Segev
Journal of Law and Policy
In this Article we reveal a dual dilemma, both material and institutional, that the Supreme Court in its current composition faces when reviewing liberal state court decisions based on the state constitution. The Article further describes substantive and procedural tactics that the Court adopts to address this dilemma, and illustrates the arguments by analyzing a number of recent Supreme Court decisions. The two dilemmas, the combination of which serve as a “power multiplier,” of sorts, have arisen following the last three appointments to the Supreme Court, which resulted in a solid majority of conservative Justices nominated by Republican presidents. One …
“More Than Tangential”: When Does The Public Have A Right To Access Judicial Records?, Jordan Elias
“More Than Tangential”: When Does The Public Have A Right To Access Judicial Records?, Jordan Elias
Journal of Law and Policy
Public accountability requires open proceedings and access to documents filed with the courts. The strong policy favoring access to judicial records creates a presumption against sealing documents without a compelling reason. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that this presumption of access arises when a proceeding relates “more than tangentially” to the merits. This is a low standard under which many types of motions qualify for the compelling reasons test. With too much litigation occurring in secret, courts can use the “more than tangential” standard proactively to keep electronic case dockets available to citizens.