Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Georgia State University College of Law (242)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (153)
- SelectedWorks (34)
- Selected Works (24)
- Brigham Young University Law School (19)
-
- Seattle University School of Law (19)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (19)
- Fordham Law School (14)
- William & Mary Law School (13)
- Duke Law (12)
- The Peter A. Allard School of Law (12)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (9)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (8)
- Emory University School of Law (7)
- Singapore Management University (5)
- University of Georgia School of Law (5)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- St. Mary's University (3)
- University of New Hampshire (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- Purdue University (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (2)
- Stephen F. Austin State University (2)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (2)
- Keyword
-
- Corporations (107)
- Corporate governance (69)
- Corporate social responsibility (28)
- Securities Law (26)
- Corporate law (22)
-
- Law (22)
- Adolf Berle (19)
- Corporate power (19)
- Society (19)
- The Modern Corporation and Private Property (19)
- Berle (18)
- Berle & Means (18)
- Berle symposium (18)
- Berle's footsteps (18)
- Law Corporations and Society (18)
- Seattle University (18)
- Seattle University Law Review (18)
- Social welfare (18)
- The modern corporation (18)
- Corporate Governance (16)
- Economics (16)
- Business (15)
- Business associations (14)
- Corporate Law (14)
- Corporate Finance (13)
- Shareholders (13)
- Law and Economics (12)
- Corporation law (11)
- ESG (11)
- Securities regulation (11)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Georgia Business Court Opinions (239)
- All Faculty Scholarship (149)
- Faculty Scholarship (26)
- Seattle University Law Review (18)
- Bruno L. Costantini García (16)
-
- Journal of Business & Technology Law (15)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (14)
- Transnational Business Governance Interactions Working Papers (12)
- Articles (8)
- Scholarly Articles (8)
- BYU Law Review (7)
- Faculty Articles (7)
- Michael Diathesopoulos (6)
- William & Mary Business Law Review (6)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (5)
- Comparative Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation (4)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- William & Mary Law Review (4)
- Anne Tucker (3)
- Faculty Publications By Year (3)
- Benedict Sheehy (2)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (2)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Journal of Financial Crises (2)
- Justin Schwartz (2)
- Kish Parella (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (2)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 653
Full-Text Articles in Business Organizations Law
Promoting Esg Investing By Trustees: Risk Management And Structuring Solutions, Vincent Ooi, Alvin W. L. See
Promoting Esg Investing By Trustees: Risk Management And Structuring Solutions, Vincent Ooi, Alvin W. L. See
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
The world is falling behind on its commitments to tackle some of the most pressing problems of this century: climate change, inequality, and other obstacles to building a sustainable future. In 2015, all Member States of the United Nations adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development which set out 17 Sustainable Development Goals (‘UNSDG’) and 169 targets spanning the spectrum of environmental, social and economic dimensions of development. At the mid-point to 2030, the UN Secretary-General reported that of the roughly 140 targets for which data is available, about 12 per cent are on track; more than half are moderately …
Criminal Subsidiaries, Andrew K. Jennings
Criminal Subsidiaries, Andrew K. Jennings
Faculty Articles
Corporate groups comprise parent companies and one or more subsidiaries, which parents use to manage liabilities, transactions, operations, and regulation. Those subsidiaries can also be used to manage criminal accountability when multiple entities within a corporate group share responsibility for a common offense. A parent, for instance, might reach a settlement with prosecutors that requires its subsidiary to plead guilty to a crime, without conviction of the parent itself—a subsidiary-only conviction (SOC). The parent will thus avoid bearing collateral consequences—such as contracting or industry bars—that would follow its own conviction. For the prosecutor, such settlements can respond to criminal law’s …
Loophole Entrepreneurship, Brian M. Sirman
Loophole Entrepreneurship, Brian M. Sirman
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
All entrepreneurs seek favorable legal or regulatory treatment for their businesses. Sometimes this leads an entrepreneur to build a business within a gap in the law—a loophole. In so doing, these “loophole entrepreneurs” may avoid steep regulatory compliance costs that otherwise would beset (or perhaps prohibit) their businesses, thereby gaining advantages over competitors. Despite these benefits, loophole entrepreneurship is fraught with risks. Loopholes, by nature, are fragile, and their contours are often uncertain. Moreover, the stigma of “exploiting a loophole” (which connotes unfairness or deception) can provoke ill will among competitors, policymakers, and the public.
The ranks of loophole entrepreneurs …
Expanding Mfw: Delaware Law Should Offer A Business Judgment Rule Safe Harbor For All Conflicted Controller Transactions, Alex Lindsey
Expanding Mfw: Delaware Law Should Offer A Business Judgment Rule Safe Harbor For All Conflicted Controller Transactions, Alex Lindsey
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
While courts usually defer to a board’s business decisions under the business judgment rule, courts will apply a much less deferential standard of review due to loyalty concerns if a conflicted controller is involved in a business decision such as a merger. However, in Kahn v. M & F Worldwide (“MFW”) when a squeeze out merger was challenged by a minority stockholder, the Delaware Supreme Court reviewed the transaction under the deferential business judgment rule standard because the Court found that the structure of the transaction neutralized the controller loyalty concerns. Building on this reasoning, the Court developed a checklist …
The Problem With The “Non-Class” Class: An Urgent Call For Improved Gatekeepers In Merger Objection Litigation, Josh Molder
The Problem With The “Non-Class” Class: An Urgent Call For Improved Gatekeepers In Merger Objection Litigation, Josh Molder
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
Until recently, class actions dominated merger objection litigation. However, plaintiff’s lawyers have constructed a “non-class” class where an individual suit can benefit from the leverage of a certified class without ever meeting the stringent class certification requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23. This new development has initiated a shift in merger objection litigation where plaintiffs are increasingly filing individual suits instead of class actions. However, this shift has left shareholders vulnerable to collusive settlements because plaintiff’s attorneys have significant control over these suits and a strong incentive to settle quickly for a substantial fee. Additionally, corporate defendants are …
The Role Of U.S. Government Regulatioms, Bert Chapman
The Role Of U.S. Government Regulatioms, Bert Chapman
Libraries Faculty and Staff Presentations
Provides detailed coverage of information resources on U.S. Government information resources for federal regulations. Features historical background on these regulations, details on the Federal Register and Code of Federal Regulations, includes information on individuals can participate in the federal regulatory process by commenting on proposed agency regulations via https://regulations.gov/, describes the role of presidential executive orders, refers to recent and upcoming U.S. Supreme Court cases involving federal regulations, and describes current congressional legislation seeking to give Congress greater involvement in the federal regulatory process.
Elba Liquefaction Co., Et. Al. V. Ihi E&C Int'l Corp., Fourth Amended Case Mgmt Order, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Elba Liquefaction Co., Et. Al. V. Ihi E&C Int'l Corp., Fourth Amended Case Mgmt Order, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
What’S Scope 3 Good For?, Madison Condon
What’S Scope 3 Good For?, Madison Condon
Faculty Scholarship
Opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) new rule on updated climate risk reporting has focused on one category of disclosures as particularly objectionable: Scope 3 emissions.7 Otherwise known as “supply chain emissions,” Scope 3 emissions have been voluntarily reported by a growing number of companies since the term was invented as part of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol in 2001.8 They include all the emissions both up and downstream of a corporations’ own activities: the emissions of the privately-owned factory that produced the shoes Target sells, as well as the emissions you burn while driving to the …
Fuqua Bcde Peachtree Corners Project Owner V. Ordner Construction Co., Et. Al., Order On Defendants' Motion To Dismiss, Wesley B. Tailor
Fuqua Bcde Peachtree Corners Project Owner V. Ordner Construction Co., Et. Al., Order On Defendants' Motion To Dismiss, Wesley B. Tailor
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Motions For Summary Judgment, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Motions For Summary Judgment, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Defendants' Motion To Exclude Testimony, Kelly L. Ellerbe
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Defendants' Motion To Exclude Testimony, Kelly L. Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Company.Com, Llc V. Priority Payment Systems, Llc, Order On Motion For Interlocutory Injunction And Motion To Dismiss, John J. Goger
Company.Com, Llc V. Priority Payment Systems, Llc, Order On Motion For Interlocutory Injunction And Motion To Dismiss, John J. Goger
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Motion To Withdraw Admissions, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Motion To Withdraw Admissions, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Alder Opportunity Lp, Et. Al. V. Cgc Capital Partners, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Pending Motions, Wesley B. Tailor
Alder Opportunity Lp, Et. Al. V. Cgc Capital Partners, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Pending Motions, Wesley B. Tailor
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
North Atlanta Vascular Clinic V. Dr. Thomas Matthews, M.D., Order On Cross-Motions For Summary Judgment, Eric A. Richardson
North Atlanta Vascular Clinic V. Dr. Thomas Matthews, M.D., Order On Cross-Motions For Summary Judgment, Eric A. Richardson
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Galaxy Next Gen. V. Elhert, Order On Counterclaim Plaintiff's Motion To Compel, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Galaxy Next Gen. V. Elhert, Order On Counterclaim Plaintiff's Motion To Compel, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Ahs International, Llc V. Assembly Atlanta, Et. Al., Order On Defendant's Motion For Leave To Amend For Attorney's Fees, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Ahs International, Llc V. Assembly Atlanta, Et. Al., Order On Defendant's Motion For Leave To Amend For Attorney's Fees, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Tidewater Fleet Supply, Llc V. Jason L. Mccard, Et. Al., Order On Defendant's Motion To Dismiss, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Tidewater Fleet Supply, Llc V. Jason L. Mccard, Et. Al., Order On Defendant's Motion To Dismiss, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Greensky, Llc V. Wellness Program Services, Llc Dba Trusii, Et. Al., Order And Judgment, John J. Goger
Greensky, Llc V. Wellness Program Services, Llc Dba Trusii, Et. Al., Order And Judgment, John J. Goger
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Galaxy Next Gen. V. Elhert, Order On Counterclaim Defendants' Motion To Dismiss, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Galaxy Next Gen. V. Elhert, Order On Counterclaim Defendants' Motion To Dismiss, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Bernard Parks, Et. Al. V. Kelly King, Et. Al., Ordr On Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment And Motion To Dismiss, John J. Goger
Bernard Parks, Et. Al. V. Kelly King, Et. Al., Ordr On Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment And Motion To Dismiss, John J. Goger
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Galaxy Next Gen. V. Elhert, Order On Discovery Issues, Kelly L. Ellerbe
Galaxy Next Gen. V. Elhert, Order On Discovery Issues, Kelly L. Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Order On Plaintiff's Motion To Compel And Motion For Contempt, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Order On Plaintiff's Motion To Compel And Motion For Contempt, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Order On Objection To Subpoena For Deposition, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Order On Objection To Subpoena For Deposition, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Ruby Tuesday, Inc. V. Cede & Co., Et. Al., Order On Remand And Defendant's Motion To Reconsider Sanctions, John J. Goger
Ruby Tuesday, Inc. V. Cede & Co., Et. Al., Order On Remand And Defendant's Motion To Reconsider Sanctions, John J. Goger
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
The Battle With Big Tech: Analyzing Antitrust Enforcement And Proposed Reforms, Youngjae Lee, Morgan Hagenbuch
The Battle With Big Tech: Analyzing Antitrust Enforcement And Proposed Reforms, Youngjae Lee, Morgan Hagenbuch
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
No abstract provided.
The Solution To Shadow Trading Is Not Found In Current Insider Trading Law: A Proposed Amendment To Rule 10b5-2, Jamel Gross-Cassel
The Solution To Shadow Trading Is Not Found In Current Insider Trading Law: A Proposed Amendment To Rule 10b5-2, Jamel Gross-Cassel
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
Shadow trading is a lucrative way to exploit a loophole in insider trading law. Insiders abuse this loophole to make six-figure profits and escape liability when done at the right companies. Those who shadow trade use material, nonpublic information to trade not in the securities of their own company, which would be illegal, but in the securities of a closely related company where the information is just as impactful. Efforts to close this loophole rely on the individual insider trading policies of the involved companies. These policies vary in language, making liability for shadow trading dependent on specific language or …
Disclosure Procedure, Andrew K. Jennings
Disclosure Procedure, Andrew K. Jennings
Faculty Articles
Securities disclosure is a human process. Each year, public companies collectively spend over fifteen million hours producing disclosures that undergird an equities market with tens of trillions in market capitalization. The procedures they follow in doing so affect whether their disclosures contain misstatements or omissions—errors that can cause trading losses for investors, and litigation for issuers. Yet despite the importance of the disclosures that firms produce, the literature says little about how they do it, including whether they are spending too much, too little, or just enough on their disclosure procedures. To fill that gap, this Article uses original surveys …
Is "Public Company" Still A Viable Regulatory Category?, George S. Georgiev
Is "Public Company" Still A Viable Regulatory Category?, George S. Georgiev
Faculty Articles
This Article suggests that the ubiquitous “public company” regulatory category, as currently constructed, has outlived its effectiveness in fulfilling core goals of the modern administrative state. An ever-expanding array of federal economic regulation hinges on public company status, but “public company” differs from most other regulatory categories in that it requires an affirmative opt-in by the subject entity. In practice, firms today become subject to public company regulation only if they need access to the public capital markets, which is much less of a business imperative than it once was due to the proliferation of private financing options. Paradoxically, then, …
Corporate Foreign Policy In War, Kishanthi Parella
Corporate Foreign Policy In War, Kishanthi Parella
Scholarly Articles
On February 24, 2022, Russian troops invaded Ukraine. Over a year later, the war has claimed tens of thousands of lives and led to the displacement of millions. In Spring 2023, both Ukrainian and Russian forces prepared new offensives, while the United States committed to providing Ukraine with military tanks—a move that Russian officials had previously warned would constitute direct involvement in the war. While countries debated how to respond, we also witnessed the privatization of foreign policy as hundreds of companies around the world similarly sought to assist Ukraine or punish Russia using the tools of national foreign policy—humanitarian …