Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons^™

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Antitrust--When Plaintiff Participates in a Scheme Initiated by Defendant, In Pari Delicto Is No Bar to Recovery

=============================

Civil Rights--Amusement Park Is Covered by Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

==============================

Civil Rights--Desegregation--Freedom-of-Choice Plans Are Not To Be Used When More Effective Means for Desegregation Are Available

==============================

Constitutional Law--Fourteenth Amendment Entitles Defendants Charged with Serious Crimes in State Courts to Trial by Jury

==============================

Constitutional Law-Reapportionment--"One Man, One Vote" Held Applicable to Units of Local Government

==============================

Constitutional Law--Search and Seizure--Police May Conduct Limited Search for Weapons in Course of Field Investigatin Without Probable Cause for …

Trade Regulation -- 1963 Tennessee Survey, Leo J. Raskind

Vanderbilt Law Review

In two cases, McKesson & Robbins v. Government Employees Department Store, Inc.,' and its companion, Plough, Inc. v. Hogue & Knott Super Market, the challenge to resale price maintenance, already successful in twenty-three other states, was brought to the Tennessee Supreme Court by appeals from two opinions holding the Tennessee Fair Trade Law unconstitutional. The historical background of fair trade legislation and the national controversy surrounding it since 1951 provide essential elements of perspective for consideration of these two cases.

Trade Regulation -- 1962 Tennessee Survey, Leo J. Raskind

Vanderbilt Law Review

In Hogue v. Kroger, a retail grocer sought a declaratory judgment, under the Dairy Law of 1961, of his right to reduce the seding price of his milk (ex-trading stamps) below the statutory price by the amount of the cost of the trading stamps to a stamp-dispensing competitor. The commissioner of agriculture opposed this practice. Being responsible under the statute for enforcing compliance with the statutory price, the commissioner answered, coupling with his answer a cross-bill seeking to enjoin further sales by Hogue at the reduced cash price. The supreme court affirmed a denial of the commissioner's injunction and remanded …

Exclusive Arrangements And Refusal To Deal Problems, Reynolds C. Seitz

Vanderbilt Law Review

Justification for including a discussion on exclusive dealing arrangements and on refusal to deal decisions in a symposium devoted to trade practices rests upon the practical consideration that there exists on the part of business management a considerable interest in the two commercial tools.

Business executives find appeal in the prospect of using a contract calling for exclusive dealing.' Those engaged in commerce have for a variety of purposes frequently employed as a lever the refusal to deal.

Possible antitrust implications in the use of the two devices has not always been understood by business. In recent years, however, the …