Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (10)
- Litigation (5)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Criminal Law (3)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (3)
-
- Evidence (3)
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Election Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- International Law (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (2)
- Torts (2)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Environmental Policy (1)
- Environmental Public Health (1)
- European Law (1)
- Health Policy (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Juvenile Law (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (8)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (3)
- University of South Carolina (3)
- West Virginia University (3)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- Campbell University School of Law (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Publication
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (7)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Saint Louis University Law Journal (3)
- South Carolina Law Review (3)
- West Virginia Law Review (3)
-
- American University International Law Review (2)
- Journal of Dispute Resolution (2)
- Campbell Law Review (1)
- Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law (1)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (1)
- Hofstra Law Review (1)
- Nevada Law Journal (1)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (1)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (1)
- University of Miami Law Review (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 32
Full-Text Articles in Law
Talking Chalk: Defacing The First Amendmen In The Public Forum, Marie A. Failinger
Talking Chalk: Defacing The First Amendmen In The Public Forum, Marie A. Failinger
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rejection Of Nonresidential Leases Of Real Property In Bankruptcy: What Happens To The Mortgagee's Security Interest? , William E. Winfield
Rejection Of Nonresidential Leases Of Real Property In Bankruptcy: What Happens To The Mortgagee's Security Interest? , William E. Winfield
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lifting The Fog: Ending Felony Disenfranchisement In Virginia, Dori Elizabeth Martin
Lifting The Fog: Ending Felony Disenfranchisement In Virginia, Dori Elizabeth Martin
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dealing With The Problem: Discretion Within The Court System, David Disco, Lisa Greer, Socrates Manoukian
Dealing With The Problem: Discretion Within The Court System, David Disco, Lisa Greer, Socrates Manoukian
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Appeals Process, Thomas M. Reavley, Thomas E. Baker, William M. Richman
The Appeals Process, Thomas M. Reavley, Thomas E. Baker, William M. Richman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
2020 Year-End Report On The Judiciary By The Chief Justice Of The United States, Thomas E. Baker
2020 Year-End Report On The Judiciary By The Chief Justice Of The United States, Thomas E. Baker
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law Enforcement And Criminal Law Decisions, Erwin Chemerinsky
Law Enforcement And Criminal Law Decisions, Erwin Chemerinsky
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Delaware’S Balancing Act, John Armour, Bernard S. Black, Brian R. Cheffins
Delaware’S Balancing Act, John Armour, Bernard S. Black, Brian R. Cheffins
Indiana Law Journal
Delaware’s courts and well-developed case law are widely seen as integral elements of Delaware’s success in attracting incorporations. However, as we show using empirical evidence involving reported judicial decisions and filed cases concerning large mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, and options backdating, Delaware’s popularity as a venue for corporate litigation is under threat. Today, a majority of shareholder suits involving Delaware companies are being brought and decided elsewhere. We examine in this Article the implications of this “out-of-Delaware” trend, emphasizing a difficult balancing act that Delaware faces. If Delaware accommodates litigation too readily, companies, fearful of lawsuits, may incorporate elsewhere. …
A Horse Of A Different Color: Distinguishing The Judiciary From The Political Branches In Campaign Financing, Anthony J. Delligatti
A Horse Of A Different Color: Distinguishing The Judiciary From The Political Branches In Campaign Financing, Anthony J. Delligatti
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hypothetical Jurisdiction And Interjurisdictional Preclusion: A "Comity" Of Errors, Ely Todd Chayet
Hypothetical Jurisdiction And Interjurisdictional Preclusion: A "Comity" Of Errors, Ely Todd Chayet
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Testimony For Sale: The Law And Ethics Of Snitches And Experts, George C. Harris
Testimony For Sale: The Law And Ethics Of Snitches And Experts, George C. Harris
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Police Efficiency And The Fourth Amendment, L. Song Richardson
Police Efficiency And The Fourth Amendment, L. Song Richardson
Indiana Law Journal
Much of our Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is premised upon a profound misunderstanding of the nature of suspicion. When determining whether law enforcement officers had the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify a “stop and frisk,” courts currently assume that, in any given case, the presence or absence of reasonable suspicion can objectively be determined simply by examining the factual circumstances that the officers confronted. This Article rejects that proposition. Powerful new research in the behavioral sciences indicates that implicit, nonconscious biases affect the perceptions and judgments that are integral to our understanding of core Fourth Amendment principles. Studies reveal, for example, …
Using The Resource-Based Theory To Determine Covenant Not To Compete Legitimacy, Norman D. Bishara, David Orozco Professor
Using The Resource-Based Theory To Determine Covenant Not To Compete Legitimacy, Norman D. Bishara, David Orozco Professor
Indiana Law Journal
This Article addresses the legitimacy of competing interests involved in the enforcement of covenants not to compete (“noncompetes”). To date, the courts and legislatures have not relied on a principled theoretical framework to identify and assess the competing interests between firms and individuals in this setting. This Article fills the research void by providing a theoretical framework that identifies the legitimacy of these competing claims. The framework integrates managerial research involving the resource-based theory of the firm and the knowledge-based perspective of competitive advantage with the legal analysis and enforcement of noncompete terms. A descriptive framework of the parties’ competing …
Owner Beware: Osha's Impact On Tort Litigation By Independent Contractors' Injured Employees Against Business Premises Owners, Jon M. Philipson
Owner Beware: Osha's Impact On Tort Litigation By Independent Contractors' Injured Employees Against Business Premises Owners, Jon M. Philipson
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Stare Decisis In The Inferior Courts Of The United States, Joseph W. Mead
Stare Decisis In The Inferior Courts Of The United States, Joseph W. Mead
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
First Options Of Chicago, Inc. V. Kaplan And The Kompetenz-Kompetenz Principle , Adrianna Dulic
First Options Of Chicago, Inc. V. Kaplan And The Kompetenz-Kompetenz Principle , Adrianna Dulic
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
In 1995, the United States Supreme Court in First Options of Chicago, Incorporated v. Kaplan considered whether arbitral tribunals or courts should have the primary power to decide if parties agreed to arbitrate the merits of the dispute and whether the court of appeals should accept the district court's findings of fact and law or apply a de novo standard of review. The Court unanimously held that, unless the parties clearly and unmistakably provide otherwise, the question of whether the parties agreed to arbitrate is to be decided by the court, not the arbitral tribunal. Furthermore, in such a case, …
Personal Jurisdiction For The Twenty-First Century: The Implications Of Mcintyre And Goodyear Dunlop Tires, Howard B. Stravitz
Personal Jurisdiction For The Twenty-First Century: The Implications Of Mcintyre And Goodyear Dunlop Tires, Howard B. Stravitz
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Inconvenient Lie: Big Tobacco Was Put On Trial For Denying The Effects Of Smoking; Is Climate Change Denial Off-Limits?, Elizabeth Dubats
An Inconvenient Lie: Big Tobacco Was Put On Trial For Denying The Effects Of Smoking; Is Climate Change Denial Off-Limits?, Elizabeth Dubats
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
Plaintiffs have made several notable attempts to bring nuisance, trespass, and negligence suits against major sources of greenhouse gas emissions for climate change related injuries. While climate change is a widely recognized environmental issue, courts have refused to recognize it as a basis for a valid cause of action in tort, finding either petitioners lack standing to bring the claim, or that the claim raises political questions that should not be addressed by the judiciary. Some more recent climate change tort claims have also included allegations of fraud on the part of the hydrocarbon industry for actively perpetuating misinformation about …
Mcintyre In Context: A Very Personal Perspective, Arthur R. Miller
Mcintyre In Context: A Very Personal Perspective, Arthur R. Miller
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Business Interests And The Long Arm In 2011, Paul D. Carrington
Business Interests And The Long Arm In 2011, Paul D. Carrington
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Searching And Seizing After 9/11: Developing And Applying Empirical Methodology To Measure Judicial Output Inthe Supreme Court's Section 8 Jurisprudence, Richard Jochelson, Michael Weinrath, Melaine Janelle Murchison
Searching And Seizing After 9/11: Developing And Applying Empirical Methodology To Measure Judicial Output Inthe Supreme Court's Section 8 Jurisprudence, Richard Jochelson, Michael Weinrath, Melaine Janelle Murchison
Dalhousie Law Journal
In 2005, Margit Cohn and Mordechai Kremnitzer created a multidimensional model to measure judicial discourse inherent in the decision making of constitutional courts. Their model set out multiple indicia bywhich to measure whether the court acted within proper constitutional constraints in order to determine the extent to which a court rendered a decision that was activist or restrained. This study attempts to operationalize that model. We use this model to analyze changes in interpretation of search and seizure law under section 8 after the enactment of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms at the Supreme Court of Canada. The …
The Wane In Spain (Of Universal Jurisdiction): Spain's Forgetful Democratic Transition And The Prosecution Of Tyrants, James J. Friedberg
The Wane In Spain (Of Universal Jurisdiction): Spain's Forgetful Democratic Transition And The Prosecution Of Tyrants, James J. Friedberg
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Examining Teacher Attitudes Toward Integration: Important Considerations For Legislatures, Courts, And Schools, Mark T. Keaney
Examining Teacher Attitudes Toward Integration: Important Considerations For Legislatures, Courts, And Schools, Mark T. Keaney
Saint Louis University Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Promise Of A Cooperative And Proportional Discovery Process In North Carolina: House Bill 380 And The New State Electronic Discovery Rules, Brian C. Vick, Neil C. Magnuson
The Promise Of A Cooperative And Proportional Discovery Process In North Carolina: House Bill 380 And The New State Electronic Discovery Rules, Brian C. Vick, Neil C. Magnuson
Campbell Law Review
Using the experience of the federal courts under the 2006 Amendments as a guide, this Article examines H.B. 380 and the effect it will have on the discovery process in the state courts. Part I of this Article describes the litigation challenges created by the proliferation of ESI. Part II describes the history, structure and substance of the 2006 Amendments, and discusses their impact in the areas of cooperation and the use of proportionality principles in the federal courts. Part III describes the substance and structure of the rules changes encompassed by H.B. 380, and analyzes the effect that they …
Reconceptualizing Federal Courts In The War On Terror, Jonathan Hafetz
Reconceptualizing Federal Courts In The War On Terror, Jonathan Hafetz
Saint Louis University Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Entitlements To And In Courts: Remedial Rights In An Age Of Egalitarianism: The Childress Lecture, Judith Resnik
Constitutional Entitlements To And In Courts: Remedial Rights In An Age Of Egalitarianism: The Childress Lecture, Judith Resnik
Saint Louis University Law Journal
No abstract provided.
War Powers, Foreign Affairs, And The Courts: Some Institutional Considerations, Jonathan L. Entin
War Powers, Foreign Affairs, And The Courts: Some Institutional Considerations, Jonathan L. Entin
Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law
No abstract provided.
Are United States Courts Receptive To International Arbitration?, Todd Weiler, Heather Bray, Devin Bray
Are United States Courts Receptive To International Arbitration?, Todd Weiler, Heather Bray, Devin Bray
American University International Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Arbitrator's Deliberation, Yves Derains
The Arbitrator's Deliberation, Yves Derains
American University International Law Review
No abstract provided.
Families Now: What We Don't Know Is Hurting Us, Judith T. Younger
Families Now: What We Don't Know Is Hurting Us, Judith T. Younger
Hofstra Law Review
No abstract provided.