Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (6)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Agriculture Law (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Communications Law (1)
-
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (1)
- Evidence (1)
- International Law (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Legal Studies (1)
- Philosophy (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Tax Law (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Real Estate Brokers: Shouldering New Burdens, Ronald B. Brown, Joseph M. Grohman
Real Estate Brokers: Shouldering New Burdens, Ronald B. Brown, Joseph M. Grohman
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Who's Afraid Of Henry Hart?, Michael Wells
Who's Afraid Of Henry Hart?, Michael Wells
Scholarly Works
No law book has enjoyed greater acclaim from distinguished commentators over a sustained period than has Hart & Wechsler's The Federal Courts and the Federal System. Indeed, the praise seems to escalate from one edition to the next. Reviewing the first edition, published forty-three years ago, Philip Kurland called it "the definitive text on the subject of federal jurisdiction." Paul Mishkin added that "the analysis is of an order difficult to match anywhere." In his review of the second edition, published in 1973, Henry Monaghan began by praising the first for having "deservedly achieved a reputation that is extraordinary among …
Treasury Regulations And Judicial Deference In The Post-Chevron Era, David A. Brennen
Treasury Regulations And Judicial Deference In The Post-Chevron Era, David A. Brennen
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Analysis of several post-Chevron cases indicates that every major Supreme Court case since 1984 involving the validity of a Treasury regulation is consistent with Chevron. Indeed, since 1984 every challenged Treasury regulation interpreting a statute in which Congress failed to address a specific tax issue has been upheld by the Court. In fact, no Supreme Court case since 1984 could be discovered in which the Court invalidated a Treasury regulation on the grounds that it was an unreasonable interpretation of a statute. Several post-Chevron Supreme
Court decisions, however, rejected the Treasury's application of a tax regulation to …
Deliberations And Disclosures: A Study Of Post-Verdict Interviews Of Jurors, Nancy S. Marder
Deliberations And Disclosures: A Study Of Post-Verdict Interviews Of Jurors, Nancy S. Marder
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of The Sourcebook Of Federal Courts, U.S. District And Bankruptcy, James S. Heller
Book Review Of The Sourcebook Of Federal Courts, U.S. District And Bankruptcy, James S. Heller
Library Staff Publications
No abstract provided.
Jaffee V. Redmond: Towards Recognition Of A Federal Counselor-Battered Woman Privilege, Fernando Laguarda, Michael B. Bressman
Jaffee V. Redmond: Towards Recognition Of A Federal Counselor-Battered Woman Privilege, Fernando Laguarda, Michael B. Bressman
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Introduction, Paul F. Campos
Exploring The Dark Matter Of Judicial Review: A Constitutional Census Of The 1990s, Seth F. Kreimer
Exploring The Dark Matter Of Judicial Review: A Constitutional Census Of The 1990s, Seth F. Kreimer
All Faculty Scholarship
Most debate about the power of judicial review proceeds as if courts primarily invoke the Constitution against the considered judgment of elected legislatures; most constitutional commentary focuses on confrontations between the United States Supreme Court and state or federal legislatures. In fact, the federal courts most often enforce constitutional norms against administrative agencies and street-level bureaucrats, and the norms are enforced not by the Supreme Court but by the federal trial courts. In this Article, Professor Kreimer surveys this "dark matter" of our constitutional universe.
The Article compares the 292 cases involving constitutional claims decided by the Supreme Court during …
Justice In The Wake Of Genocide: The Case Of Rwanda, Madeline Morris
Justice In The Wake Of Genocide: The Case Of Rwanda, Madeline Morris
Faculty Scholarship
During three months in 1994, genocide was committed in Rwanda. Two years after those events, and notwithstanding efforts at both national and international levels to bring the perpetrators to justice, the first case has yet to go to trial. Over the past months, I have worked closely with the government of Rwanda on justice issues in the course of a research project that I am doing on the role of national and international tribunals in the former Yugoslavia, Ethiopia, and Rwanda. I would like to share with you some observations arising from that work. I will examine the approaches to …