Law Commons^™

The Arbitration Clause As Super Contract, Richard Frankel

Richard Frankel

It is widely acknowledged that the purpose of the Federal Arbitration Act was to place arbitration clauses on equal footing with other contracts. Nonetheless, federal and state courts have turned arbitration clauses into “super contracts” by creating special interpretive rules for arbitration clauses that do not apply to other contracts. In doing so, they have relied extensively, and incorrectly, on the Supreme Court’s determination that the FAA embodies a federal policy favoring arbitration.

While many scholars have focused attention on the public policy rationales for and against arbitration, few have explored how arbitration clauses should be interpreted. This article fills …

Illegal Emigration: The Continuing Life Of Invalid Deportation Orders, Richard Frankel

Richard Frankel

Federal appeals courts overturn more than one thousand deportation orders every year. A significant number of those reversals involve non-citizens who are abroad because they have been deported as a result of losing their cases at the administrative level. Although an order overturning a deportation order ordinarily restores non-citizens to their prior status of being lawfully present in the United States, federal immigration authorities have used the fact of the non-citizen’s now-invalidated deportation to subject such non-citizens to a new and previously inapplicable set of standards that has the effect of preventing them from returning. Under this practice, non-citizens who …

The Disappearing Opt-Out Right In Punitive Damages Class Actions, Richard Frankel

Richard Frankel

The tension between protecting defendants from multiple punitive damages awards for a single act and ensuring that wronged plaintiffs can recover punitive damages is one of the most pressing problems in punitive damages law today. Numerous commentators have proposed non-opt-out class actions for punitive damages as the best solution to the “multiple punishment” problem because they subject defendants to a single collective punitive damages award that can be distributed equitably across all injured plaintiffs. This Article challenges that position. It argues that mandatory classes improperly deprive class plaintiffs of their right to opt out and pursue their own individual claims …