Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Law
Tempest In An Empty Teapot: Why The Constitution Does Not Regulate Gerrymandering, Larry Alexander, Saikrishna B. Prakash
Tempest In An Empty Teapot: Why The Constitution Does Not Regulate Gerrymandering, Larry Alexander, Saikrishna B. Prakash
William & Mary Law Review
Judges and scholars are convinced that the Constitution forbids gerrymandering that goes "too far"--legislative redistrictings that are too partisan, too focused on race, etc. Gerrymanders are said to be unconstitutional for many reasons-they dilute votes, they are anti-democratic, and they generate uncompetitive elections won by extremist candidates. Judges and scholars cite numerous clauses that gerrymanders supposedly violate- the Equal Protection Clause, the Guarantee Clause, and even the First Amendment. We dissent from this orthodoxy. Most of these claims rest on the notion that the Constitution establishes certain ideals about representation in legislatures and about the outcome and conduct of elections. …
Gonzales V. Carhart: Continuing The Class Critique Of The Reproductive Rights Doctrine And Movement, Pamela Bridgwater
Gonzales V. Carhart: Continuing The Class Critique Of The Reproductive Rights Doctrine And Movement, Pamela Bridgwater
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expanding Participation In Constitution Making: Challenges And Opportunities, Angela M. Banks
Expanding Participation In Constitution Making: Challenges And Opportunities, Angela M. Banks
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Baghdad, Tokyo, Kabul….Constitution Making In Occupied States, Zachary Elkins, Tom Ginsburg, James Melton
Baghdad, Tokyo, Kabul….Constitution Making In Occupied States, Zachary Elkins, Tom Ginsburg, James Melton
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Popular Authorship And Constitution Making: Comparing And Contrasting The Drc And Kenya, James Thuo Gathii
Popular Authorship And Constitution Making: Comparing And Contrasting The Drc And Kenya, James Thuo Gathii
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
What's In A Name? Reflections On Timing, Naming, And Constitution-Making, Vicki C. Jackson
What's In A Name? Reflections On Timing, Naming, And Constitution-Making, Vicki C. Jackson
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Could And Should America Have Made An Ottoman Republic In 1919?, Paul D. Carrington
Could And Should America Have Made An Ottoman Republic In 1919?, Paul D. Carrington
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Quintessential Elements Of Meaningful Constitutions In Post-Conflict States, William W. Van Alstyne
Quintessential Elements Of Meaningful Constitutions In Post-Conflict States, William W. Van Alstyne
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitution Making At The Edges Of Constituional Order, Karol Edward Soltan
Constitution Making At The Edges Of Constituional Order, Karol Edward Soltan
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Conciliatory Institutions And Constitutional Processes In Post-Conflict States, Donald L. Horowitz
Conciliatory Institutions And Constitutional Processes In Post-Conflict States, Donald L. Horowitz
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Speaking Against Norms: Public Discourse And The Economy Of Racialization In The Workplace, Terry Smith
Speaking Against Norms: Public Discourse And The Economy Of Racialization In The Workplace, Terry Smith
American University Law Review
Free speech controversies erupt from reactions to outlier voices, and these voices are often those of subordinated citizens such as racial minorities. Employing the tools of narrative, interviews with litigants and subjects, and interdisciplinary analysis of case law, Professor Terry Smith probes whether the social inequality of government employees of color affects the rigor of the First Amendment protection afforded their speech. Professor Smith argues that all public sector employees lack sufficient protection because their speech typically does not receive the highest constitutional scrutiny and because of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Garcetti v. Ceballos, which stripped public sector …
Footnote Eleven For The New Millennium: Ecological Perspective Arguments In Support Of Compelling Interest, Malik Edwards
Footnote Eleven For The New Millennium: Ecological Perspective Arguments In Support Of Compelling Interest, Malik Edwards
Seattle University Law Review
This Article proceeds in three Parts. Part II considers the historical and social context that led to the ultimate successful strategy in Brown. Although times may have changed, my ultimate argument is that contexts matters; as such, to fully understand Brown, we must understand the strategy behind it and the road that takes us from Plessy to Brown<,/em>. Part III considers the trends that led to Brown's undoing. While Brown I offers no remedy and Brown II provides that schools should be desegregated “with all deliberate speed,” one must understand the societal shifts that occurred, fundamentally changing the …
Parents Involved And The Meaning Of Brown: An Old Debate Renewed, Jonathon L. Entin
Parents Involved And The Meaning Of Brown: An Old Debate Renewed, Jonathon L. Entin
Seattle University Law Review
This Article examines some of the jurisprudential roots of the racial discrimination debate, tracing the issue back to Brown and its immediate aftermath but finding the seeds of the disagreement in the ambiguities of the first Justice Harlan's celebrated dissenting opinion in Plessy v. Ferguson. The tensions between the two approaches did not matter in Plessy because segregation was impermissible under either theory, but the two approaches pointed in opposite directions in Parents Involved. Part II offers an overview of the Seattle and Louisville policies that were struck down in Parents Involved. Part III examines the various …
International Law And The Constitution: Terms Of Engagement, Foreword, Catherine Powell
International Law And The Constitution: Terms Of Engagement, Foreword, Catherine Powell
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Emerging First Amendment Law Of Managerial Prerogative, Lawrence Rosenthal
The Emerging First Amendment Law Of Managerial Prerogative, Lawrence Rosenthal
Fordham Law Review
In Garcetti v. Ceballos, the U.S. Supreme Court, by the narrowest of margins, held that allegations of police perjury made in memoranda to his superiors by Richard Ceballos, a supervisory prosecutor in the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office, were unprotected by the First Amendment because “his expressions were made pursuant to his duties.” The academic reaction to this holding has been harshly negative; scholars argue that the holding will prevent the public from learning of governmental misconduct that is known only to those working within the bowels of the government itself. This Article rejects the scholarly consensus on Garcetti. …
Hazelwood V. Kuhlmeier And The University: Why The High School Standard Is Here To Stay, Christopher N. Lavigne
Hazelwood V. Kuhlmeier And The University: Why The High School Standard Is Here To Stay, Christopher N. Lavigne
Fordham Urban Law Journal
In Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, the Supreme Court evaluated the administrative control of a high school newspaper and held that public school officials could control speech in school-sponsored activities if they did so for legitimate pedagogical reasons. While the Court reserved the question of whether this standard should be applicable at the university level, various federal circuit courts have since applied this speech-restrictive standard to student speech at colleges and universities. In light of these circuit court opinions, there has been considerable debate about whether and to what extent the Hazelwood framework should apply to college and university students. …