Law Commons^™

Merging Mediation Models – And Other Lessons, John Lande

Faculty Blogs

This post offers suggestions for teaching about mediation practice without focusing primarily on the problematic traditional mediation theories described in Section 3.C. It suggests that faculty (1) help students understand dynamics related to assessments of court outcomes, (2) teach students to strategically combine elements from the traditional models, (3) teach them how to manage the counteroffer process, (4) include lawyer-client relationships in simulations, and (5) use longer simulations including preparation for mediation sessions.

Lira In Criminal Cases, John Lande

Faculty Blogs

This post describes how the LIRA framework can be adapted in criminal cases and used in plea bargaining. It suggests how to calculate and use bottom lines in these cases.

Concepts That Can Help Practitioners Help Parties Make Decisions In Disputes, John Lande

Faculty Blogs

A fundamental purpose of dispute resolution practitioners is to help people make decisions about processes, procedures, and issues in managing their conflicts. This post lists concepts to help people make decisions about the choice of dispute resolution process, specific procedures in a given process, and resolving issues in dispute. In resolving disputes, people should consider the value of plausible options and the future tangible costs and intangible costs and interests of continuing the dispute. The post lists specific cognitions, possible actions, and practitioner interventions promoting good decision-making.

Problems With Teaching “Integrative” Negotiation, John Lande

Faculty Blogs

This post responds to Debra Berman’s piece, Is Our Over-Emphasis on Integrative Negotiation Pedagogy Falling Short of Reality? My answer is “yes.” Much – perhaps most – negotiation and mediation of civil cases these days in the US involves a counteroffer process where lawyers focus almost exclusively on allocating money based on a zero-sum assumption. So if our courses focus too much on interests-and-options processes, students get a misimpression about the frequency of what happens in the real world. If we don’t prepare them to operate effectively in practice, they will be in for a rude surprise after they graduate. …

A Message For Law Students To Prepare Themselves For Legal Practice, John Lande

Faculty Blogs

This post includes suggestions to help plan self-directed learning to supplement what students learn in law school. It recommends that students (1) appreciate the values and limitations of the law, (2) recognize the “hidden curriculum” in law school, (3) understand that “thinking like a lawyer” really is about helping clients achieve their goals, (4) develop a strategic plan for their education, (5) compile a portfolio, (6) take clinical, externship, and practice courses, (7) interview practitioners, and (8) join the ABA and other bar and professional associations.

You Really Should Know About Kris Franklin, John Lande

Faculty Blogs

This post profiles New York Law School Professor Kris Franklin. She teaches a negotiating, counseling, and interviewing course, which she says really should be called “Client Representation and Case Handling.” Her course on family law practice teaches all the family law doctrine covered in traditional family law courses but she does it exclusively using simulations. In contrast to my suggestion for renaming law school as “negotiation school,” she suggests calling it “legal problem-solving school,” which I think is even better.

Study Finds That Law Schools Fail To Prepare Students To Work With Clients And Negotiate, John Lande

Faculty Blogs

This post provides excerpts from the Building a Better Bar study about new law school graduates’ unmet instructional needs. The study found that new lawyers were “woefully unprepared” to work with clients. They had difficulty (1) communicating with clients, (2) managing expectations, (3) breaking bad news, (4) coping with difficult clients, (5) negotiating with counterparts and clients, and (5) understanding the “big picture” of client matters.

Need For Clear Language Initiative To Un-Babel Our Models, John M. Lande

Faculty Blogs

Professional jargon is helpful in some fields because it promotes communication between professionals like brain surgeons and rocket scientists.

But jargon is extremely problematic for dispute resolution because it confuses and excludes laypeople and other stakeholders.

Amicus Curiae Briefs: A Message From The 7th Circuit, Douglas E. Abrams

Faculty Publications

Like other brief writers, the amicus brief’s writer must heed the court’s rules of practice and procedure, including rules that prescribe a brief’s maximum page length. But a brief writer can meet the court’s circumstances and expectations without going to the max. A few months before he ascended to the Supreme Court bench in 1943, D.C. Circuit Judge Wiley B. Rutledge advised advocates to strike a balance by being “as brief as one can be consistent with adequate and clear presentation of his case."

An amicus’ prudent approach to concise brief writing is to adapt the advice delivered by opera …

Muddied Waters: A Review Of Joint Venture Jurisprudence In Missouri, Colin W. Byrd

Missouri Law Review

Nearly four decades ago, the Supreme Court of Missouri issued an opinion that continues to generate confusion on what constitutes a joint venture. Johnson v. Pacific Intermountain Express Co. not only distorted the elements required to establish a joint venture but also provided for the business organization’s wrongful creation by operation of law through implication.1 Upon this shaky foundation, corporate law jurisprudence in Missouri has grappled for decades with the same essential questions of what constitutes a joint venture and how this species of partnership may come into existence.

Faculty List

Missouri Law Review

No abstract provided.

Masthead

Missouri Law Review

No abstract provided.

Copyright

Missouri Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents

Missouri Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Public Policy Argument Against Trademark Licensee Estoppel And Naked Licensing, James B. Astrachan

Missouri Law Review

Federal courts have sometimes applied the doctrine of licensee estoppel to prohibit a trademark licensee from challenging its licensor’s rights to the licensed mark, particularly where the licensor has failed to establish and monitor quality control and the licensee contends that abandonment has occurred. This Article examines the history of licensee estoppel and those cases on which courts have and have not enforced licensee estoppel; often on the grounds that enforcing licensee estoppel would not serve the public policy of protecting consumers from deceitful practices. This Article also compares trademark licensee estoppel to patent licensee estoppel and recognize that courts …

A Comprehensive Consideration Of The Structural-Error Doctrine, Zachary L. Henderson

Missouri Law Review

Court proceedings are rarely perfect – far from it. Errors happen regularly before and during litigation, and when they do, courts must decide how to handle them. Gone are the days when a typo might demand a new trial: many errors – typos certainly, but also much more serious mistakes – are regularly deemed harmless by the court, meaning those errors had no prejudicial effect on the outcome of the case (and so do not warrant a new trial). Yet even after the development of the harmless-error doctrine in the early part of the twentieth century, errors involving constitutional rights …

Gutting Bivens: How The Supreme Court Shielded Federal Officials From Constitutional Litigation, Alexander J. Lindvall

Missouri Law Review

“No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. . . . All officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it. . . . [And the] Courts of justice are established, not only to decide upon the controverted rights of the citizens as against each other, but also upon rights in controversy between them and the government.” —United States v. Lee (1882)

Terminating The Parental Rights Of Mothers With Disabilities: An Empirical Legal Analysis, Robyn M. Powell, Susan L. Parish, Monika Mitra, Michael Waterstone, Stephen Fournier

Missouri Law Review

A sizable body of scholarship indicates parents with disabilities – including physical, intellectual, psychiatric, and sensory disabilities – experience pervasive inequities that threaten their fundamental right to parenthood. In particular, compared to nondisabled parents, parents with disabilities are overrepresented in the child welfare system, receive inadequate family preservation and reunification services, and have disproportionate rates of termination of parental rights. Despite extensive legal and social science scholarship, however, there are no empirical analyses of judicial opinions to identify factors that predict termination of parental rights in cases involving parents with disabilities.

The Smokescreen Problem In Abortion Jurisprudence: How The Undue Burden Standard And Long-Term Legislative Tactics Allow Courts To Turn A Blind Eye To True Legislative Intent, Lucy Downing

Missouri Law Review

The issue of abortion has been passionately debated in this country for many years. For decades, our legal system has recognized that legitimate interests in the subject lie with both women and the State.1 From the time the right of free choice was found to be granted by our Constitution in Roe v. Wade, however, the legal standard with which to assess these competing interests has been a source of debate and confusion.2 Abortion is undoubtedly an issue that implicates deeply rooted moral considerations for many people, but the United States Supreme Court has carefully undertaken the responsibility of formulating …

No Holds Barred: The Use Of Restrictive Behavioral Intervention In Missouri Public Schools, Claire Hawley

Missouri Law Review

While students in public school still retain certain constitutional rights, these rights are not coextensive to those of adults in other settings. This is largely due to the traditional deference in American jurisprudence to school officials on decisions of student discipline. This deference is generally understood to reflect the uniquely difficult nature of student discipline, which involves the delicate balancing of students’ constitutional right to a public education with their right to a safe learning environment.

Show Me Your Id: Missouri Voter Identification Laws And The Right To Vote, Tyler M. Ludwig

Missouri Law Review

Nearly fifteen years ago, the Supreme Court of Missouri held that “the right to vote is fundamental to Missouri citizens” and is afforded protections against voter identification requirements beyond what is provided by the United States Constitution.1 Since that time, state lawmakers have made numerous attempts to impose more stringent voter identification requirements.2 In Priorities USA v. State, the Supreme Court of Missouri struck down the latest of those attempts for unconstitutionally infringing upon the right to vote.3 Part II of this Note examines the facts and holding of that case. Part III examines the history, critiques, and challenges of …

“Alternative Method Required” And The Injection Of Imaginary Language Into The Missouri Constitution, Calla M. Mears

Missouri Law Review

Mike Kehoe was appointed to Lieutenant Governor of Missouri in 2018 after Michael Parson became Governor of Missouri following the resignation of Eric Greitens.1 A lawsuit raising interesting questions about the constitutional process for filling public office vacancies quickly followed the appointment of Lieutenant Governor Kehoe.2 Article IV, Section 4 of the Missouri Constitution states: “The governor shall fill all vacancies in public offices unless otherwise provided by law, and his appointees shall serve until their successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified.”3 First, what exactly does the phrase “unless otherwise provided by law” mean in the context of …

Faculty List

Missouri Law Review

No abstract provided.

Mere Common Ownership And The Antitrust Laws, Thomas A. Lambert

Faculty Publications

"Common ownership," also called "horizontal shareholding," refers to a stock investor's ownership of minority stakes in multiple competing firms. Recent empirical studies have purported to show that institutional investors' common ownership reduces competition among commonly owned competitors. "Mere common ownership" is horizontal shareholding that is not accompanied by any sort of illicit agreement, such as a hub-and-spoke conspiracy, or the holding of a control-conferring stake. This Article considers the legality of mere common ownership under the U.S. antitrust laws. Prominent antitrust scholars and the leading treatise have concluded that mere common ownership that has the incidental effect of lessening market …

Jeff Trueman’S Study On Nightmares Of “Positional” Tactics In Mediation, John M. Lande

Faculty Blogs

This post reports on an excellent study about the challenges of lawyers, mediators, and insurance claims professionals in mediation. His findings are consistent with my observations about the emotional pains of positional negotiation. Many of the cases in his study involve insurance, which are supposedly “money-only cases” because the parties generally haven’t had a prior relationship and have no interest in a future relationship. But Jeff found that emotions and relationships actually can be very important in these cases – the professionals’ emotions and relationships with each other.

Donna Shestowsky’S Presentation On Litigants’ Views Of Court Adr Options, John M. Lande

Faculty Blogs

This post hightlights findings from Donna Shestowsky’s research finding that litigants seem to be unaware of ADR options, and that knowing about some of these options improves their opinions of the court itself. Surprisingly, having a lawyer did not make litigants more aware of ADR options, even when those options were offered by the court system.

Covid-19 And Its Impact On America's Retirement System, David M. English

Faculty Publications

There is a long-standing debate over whether America's retirement system is in crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic has resolved the debate. Perhaps the system was merely challenged prior to March 2020, but it is certainly in crisis now. The pandemic has negatively impacted all four of the principal pillars of retirement: Social Security, employer-sponsored retirement programs, earnings from part-time work, and the worker's own savings. This short article will discuss the impact of the pandemic on the retirement system and discuss possible ways to restore the system to health or at least ameliorate the damage.

They Should Call It Negotiation School, Not Law School, John Lande

Faculty Blogs

Considering that lawyers spend much more time negotiating than going to trial, I offered suggestions for fundamentally reorganizing law school curricula and policies. This somewhat mischievous thought experiment includes ideas that are too radical for any law school to consider given the deeply entrenched institutionalization of legal education. But it is useful to ponder how law schools generally do a poor job of preparing students for the reality of practice and how schools might reform their curricula to do a better job.

Distorted Drug Patents, Erika Lietzan

Faculty Publications

Drug patents are distorted. Unlike most other inventors, drug inventors must complete years of testing to the government’s specifications and seek government approval to commercialize their inventions. All the while, the patent term runs. When a drug inventor finally launches a medicine that embodies the invention, only a fraction of the patent life remains. And yet, conventional wisdom holds — and empirical studies show — that patent life is essential to innovation in the pharmaceutical industry, perhaps more so than any other inventive industry. Congress tried to do something about this in 1984, authorizing the Patent and Trademark Office to …

Co-Worker Evidence In Court, Sandra F. Sperino

Faculty Publications

This symposium explores ways to empower workers. Many employment laws rely on workers filing private rights of action to enforce the underlying substantive law. Unfortunately, when workers file these claims in court, courts often do not allow them to rely on evidence from their co-workers. While courts regularly allow employers to submit co-worker evidence of a plaintiff's poor performance or lack of qualifications, they often diminish or exclude a plaintiff's co-worker evidence that the plaintiff performed well or possessed desired qualifications. This Article identifies and explores this evidentiary inequality. It argues that efforts to empower workers must include the power …