Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (143)
- St. John's University School of Law (95)
- Duquesne University (76)
- University of Maine School of Law (63)
- William & Mary Law School (57)
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (48)
- American University Washington College of Law (41)
- Duke Law (36)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (35)
- Roger Williams University (32)
- University of Michigan Law School (25)
- University of Colorado Law School (24)
- Pace University (21)
- University of New Hampshire (21)
- Fordham Law School (20)
- Notre Dame Law School (20)
- UC Law SF (20)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (19)
- University of Georgia School of Law (17)
- University of Richmond (17)
- Brigham Young University Law School (16)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (16)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (15)
- Florida State University College of Law (14)
- Georgia State University College of Law (14)
- The University of Akron (14)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (14)
- University of Miami Law School (14)
- Pepperdine University (13)
- Boston University School of Law (11)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (88)
- Philosophy (78)
- Theology (76)
- American Religious Democracy (70)
- Hallowed Secularism (70)
-
- Supreme Court (64)
- Politics (55)
- Constitution (47)
- First Amendment (47)
- Law (44)
- Constitutional Law (39)
- Free speech (27)
- Federalism (25)
- Due process (24)
- United States (24)
- Privacy (23)
- Discrimination (22)
- Fourth Amendment (22)
- Immigration (21)
- Freedom of speech (20)
- Human rights (20)
- Freedom of Speech (19)
- Religion (18)
- Separation of powers (18)
- United States Supreme Court (18)
- Constitutional Interpretation (17)
- Originalism (17)
- Equal protection (16)
- Fourteenth Amendment (16)
- Civil rights (15)
- Publication
-
- The Catholic Lawyer (87)
- Hallowed Secularism (70)
- Maine Law Review (63)
- Erwin Chemerinsky (45)
- Faculty Scholarship (45)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (29)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (29)
- Articles (28)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (26)
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law (25)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (22)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (21)
- Fordham Law Review (20)
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (20)
- Publications (19)
- Faculty Publications (17)
- BYU Law Review (16)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (16)
- Journal Articles (16)
- Scholarly Works (16)
- Leslie Gielow Jacobs (15)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (15)
- Northwestern University Law Review (15)
- Maryland Law Review (14)
- William & Mary Law Review (14)
- Touro Law Review (13)
- Law School Blogs (12)
- University of Miami Law Review (12)
- Pace Law Review (11)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (10)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1111 - 1140 of 1282
Full-Text Articles in Law
Immigration Adjudication: The Missing Rule Of Law, Lenni B. Benson
Immigration Adjudication: The Missing Rule Of Law, Lenni B. Benson
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Economic Justice: Structural Power For "We The People", Martha T. Mccluskey
Constitutional Economic Justice: Structural Power For "We The People", Martha T. Mccluskey
Journal Articles
Toward that goal, this essay proposes a structural principle of collective economic power for “we the people.” This principle is both consistent with longstanding Constitutional ideals and tailored to the current challenges of neoliberal ideology and policy. It develops two premises: first, it rejects the neoliberal economic ideology that defines legitimate power and freedom as individualized “choice” constrained by an existing political economy. Instead, this proposed principle recognizes that meaningful political economic freedom and power fundamentally consist of access to collective organizations with potential to create a “more perfect union” with better and less constrained options. Second, the post-Lochner principle …
Exemplary And Exceptional Confusion Under The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Dora W. Klein
Exemplary And Exceptional Confusion Under The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Dora W. Klein
Faculty Articles
This Article proposes that the final provisions of Rule 407 and 411, which provide a list of examples of permitted purposes for which a court may admit evidence, are asking for trouble--specifically, the trouble that courts will interpret the list not as examples, but as a specially enumerated, exhaustive list of exceptions.
God And State Preambles, Peter J. Smith, Robert W. Tuttle
God And State Preambles, Peter J. Smith, Robert W. Tuttle
Marquette Law Review
Those who question the permissibility of official acknowledgements of God might be surprised to learn that the preambles of forty-five of the fifty state constitutions expressly invoke God. The practice is common in both liberal and conservative states and is equally prevalent in all regions of the country. Virtually all of those preambles give thanks to God, and many also seek God's blessing n the state's endeavors. Yet there has been no detailed assessment of the preambles' history or significance. This paper seeks to remedy that gap.
The preambles complicate the claim that official acknowledgements of God are incompatible with …
Embracing Race-Conscious College Admissions Programs: How Fisher V. University Of Texas At Austin Redefines "Affirmative Action" As A Holistic Approach To Admissions That Ensures Equal, Not Preferential, Treatment, Nancy L. Zisk
Marquette Law Review
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-established Supreme Court doctrine that race may be considered when a college or university decides whom to admit and whom to reject, as long as the consideration of race is part of a narrowly tailored holistic consideration of an applicant's many distinguishing features. The Court's latest decision heralds a new way of thinking about holistic race-conscious admissions programs. Rather than considering them as "affirmative action" plans that prefer any one applicant to the disadvantage of another, they should be viewed as the Court has described …
Man Up Or Go Home: Exploring Perceptions Of Women In Leadership, Abigail Perdue
Man Up Or Go Home: Exploring Perceptions Of Women In Leadership, Abigail Perdue
Marquette Law Review
Throughout history, women in positions of authority have often been perceived as violating well-established gender norms. Perhaps as a result, female leadership has often been viewed as a threat to male power and privilege and thus provoked resistance. Female leaders challenge longstanding sex stereotypes and patriarchal structures, subverting the identities of androcentric institutions and the people who comprise them. In so doing, they redefine notions of what it means to be a leader as well as what it means to be a woman. Cisgender male subordinates in particular may feel that their masculinity is under assault when they are placed …
Justice Scalia, Implied Rights Of Action, And Historical Practice, Anthony J. Bellia
Justice Scalia, Implied Rights Of Action, And Historical Practice, Anthony J. Bellia
Journal Articles
In the realm of Federal Courts, the question of “implied rights of action” asks when, if ever, may a plaintiff bring a federal right of action for the violation of a federal statute that does not expressly create one. Justice Scalia argued that a court should not entertain an action for damages for the violation of a federal statute unless the text of the statute demonstrates that Congress meant to create a right of action. The Supreme Court adopted this approach in 2001 in Alexander v. Sandoval, with Justice Scalia writing for the majority. Certain judges and scholars have argued …
Conservatives And The Court, Robert F. Nagel
Generation Gaps And Ties That Bind: Constitutional Commitments And The Framers' Bequest Of Unamendable Provisions, George Mader
Generation Gaps And Ties That Bind: Constitutional Commitments And The Framers' Bequest Of Unamendable Provisions, George Mader
Faculty Scholarship
“We the People.” That phrase conjures a vision of present-day U.S. citizens taking part of a continuous enterprise of constitutional development, each succeeding generation stepping into the shoes of those who framed and ratified the Constitution and, as the new performer in the role of “We the People,” reinterpreting a centuries-old role. Like those who created the role, we have power to modify the Constitution. But is each succeeding generation really allowed the same creative and expressive power to alter the role, to amend the Constitution?
The subject of this Article, in general, is the relationship between “We the People,” …
The Modern Class Action Rule: Its Civil Rights Roots And Relevance Today, Suzette M. Malveaux
The Modern Class Action Rule: Its Civil Rights Roots And Relevance Today, Suzette M. Malveaux
Publications
The modern class action rule recently turned fifty years old — a golden anniversary. However, this milestone is marred by an increase in hate crimes, violence and discrimination. Ironically, the rule is marking its anniversary within a similarly tumultuous environment as its birth — the civil rights movement of the 1960’s. This irony calls into question whether this critical aggregation device is functioning as the drafters intended. This article makes three contributions.
First, the article unearths the rule’s rich history, revealing how the rule was designed in 1966 to enable structural reform and broad injunctive relief in civil rights cases. …
Siri-Ously 2.0: What Artificial Intelligence Reveals About The First Amendment, Toni M. Massaro, Helen Norton, Margot E. Kaminski
Siri-Ously 2.0: What Artificial Intelligence Reveals About The First Amendment, Toni M. Massaro, Helen Norton, Margot E. Kaminski
Publications
The First Amendment may protect speech by strong Artificial Intelligence (AI). In this Article, we support this provocative claim by expanding on earlier work, addressing significant concerns and challenges, and suggesting potential paths forward.
This is not a claim about the state of technology. Whether strong AI — as-yet-hypothetical machines that can actually think — will ever come to exist remains far from clear. It is instead a claim that discussing AI speech sheds light on key features of prevailing First Amendment doctrine and theory, including the surprising lack of humanness at its core.
Courts and commentators wrestling with free …
Public Employee Speech: Answering The Unanswered And Related Questions In Lane V. Franks, John E. Rumel
Public Employee Speech: Answering The Unanswered And Related Questions In Lane V. Franks, John E. Rumel
Articles
No abstract provided.
Civil Asset Forfeiture Abuses: Can State Legislation Solve The Problem?, David Pimentel
Civil Asset Forfeiture Abuses: Can State Legislation Solve The Problem?, David Pimentel
Articles
No abstract provided.
Forfeitures And The Eighth Amendment: A Practical Approach To The Excessive Fines Clause As A Check On Government Seizures, David Pimentel
Forfeitures And The Eighth Amendment: A Practical Approach To The Excessive Fines Clause As A Check On Government Seizures, David Pimentel
Articles
No abstract provided.
Civil Asset Forfeiture Abuses: Can State Legislation Solve The Problem?, David Pimentel
Civil Asset Forfeiture Abuses: Can State Legislation Solve The Problem?, David Pimentel
Articles
No abstract provided.
The Political Process Argument For Overruling Quill, Edward A. Zelinsky
The Political Process Argument For Overruling Quill, Edward A. Zelinsky
Brooklyn Law Review
Should the U.S. Supreme Court overrule Quill Corporation v. North Dakota? A careful assessment of the federal political process suggests that the Supreme Court itself should overturn Quill in the Court’s role as guardian of the states against federal commandeering. A combination of factors underlay this conclusion: the tactical advantage that Quill bestows in the political process upon the internet and mail order industries, the importance of the states in the structure of federalism, the centrality of sales taxes to the financing of state government, the severe impediment which Quill and its physical presence test impose upon the collection of …
The Bds Movement: That Which We Call A Foreign Boycott, By Any Other Name, Is Still Illegal, Marc A. Greendorfer
The Bds Movement: That Which We Call A Foreign Boycott, By Any Other Name, Is Still Illegal, Marc A. Greendorfer
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Franchise Tax Board Of California V. Hyatt: A Split Court, Full Faith And Credit, And Federal Common Law, Jonathan M. Gutoff
Franchise Tax Board Of California V. Hyatt: A Split Court, Full Faith And Credit, And Federal Common Law, Jonathan M. Gutoff
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Salvaging The Term "Suitor": How The Declaratory Judgment Act Has Commandeered Congressional Intent, Brett P. Hargaden
Salvaging The Term "Suitor": How The Declaratory Judgment Act Has Commandeered Congressional Intent, Brett P. Hargaden
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
2016 Survey Of Rhode Island Law: Cases And Public Laws Of Note
2016 Survey Of Rhode Island Law: Cases And Public Laws Of Note
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court Of Canada And Federalism: Does / Should Anyone Care Anymore?, A. Wayne Mackay
The Supreme Court Of Canada And Federalism: Does / Should Anyone Care Anymore?, A. Wayne Mackay
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Federalism is still a relevant and vital aspect of Canadian Constitutional Law. Although a lower profile aspect than the Charter of Rights and Aboriginal rights (and in common parlance less "sexy"), the division of powers continues to an important part of the work of the Supreme Court of Canada and part of what defines us as a nation. The author argues that the Supreme Court has pursued an increasingly contextualized approach to division of powers issues - one that abandons the arid legalism of earlier days, in favour of a broad social analysis of issues based on extensive use of …
Who Has Standing To Sue The President Over Allegedly Unconstitutional Emoluments?, Matthew I. Hall
Who Has Standing To Sue The President Over Allegedly Unconstitutional Emoluments?, Matthew I. Hall
Scholarly Works
Three pending lawsuits challenge President Trump's practice of accepting payments and other benefits from foreign governments through his businesses as violative of the Foreign Emoluments Clause. They also allege that the President's practice of accepting payments and benefits from state or federal governmental units violates the Domestic Emoluments Clause. These actions raise interesting questions about the meaning of two little-discussed provisions of the Constitution. But before reaching the merits the courts will first have to grapple with issues of justiciability - in particular, with the question whether plaintiffs have "standing" to bring their claims in federal court. This article explains …
Adjudicating Religious Sincerity, Nathan Chapman
Adjudicating Religious Sincerity, Nathan Chapman
Scholarly Works
Recent disputes about the “contraception mandate” under the Affordable Care Act and about the provision of goods and services for same-sex weddings have drawn attention to the law of religious accommodations. So far, however, one of the requirements of a religious accommodation claim has escaped sustained scholarly attention: a claimant must be sincere. Historically, scholars have contested this requirement on the ground that adjudicating religious sincerity requires government officials to delve too deeply into religious questions, something the Establishment Clause forbids. Until recently, however, the doctrine was fairly clear: though the government may not evaluate the objective accuracy or plausibility …
The “Sovereigns Of Cyberspace” And State Action: The First Amendment’S Application (Or Lack Thereof) To Third-Party Platforms, Jonathan Peters
The “Sovereigns Of Cyberspace” And State Action: The First Amendment’S Application (Or Lack Thereof) To Third-Party Platforms, Jonathan Peters
Scholarly Works
Many scholars have commented that the state action doctrine forecloses use of the First Amendment to constrain the policies and practices of online service providers. But few have comprehensively studied this issue, and the seminal article exploring “[c]yberspace and the [s]tate [a]ction [d]ebate” is fifteen years old, published before the U.S. Supreme Court reformulated the federal approach to state action. It is important to give the state action doctrine regular scholarly attention, not least because it is increasingly clear that “the private sector has a shared responsibility to help safeguard free expression.” It is critical to understand whether the First …
The Fragility Of The Free American Press, Ronnell Anderson Jones, Sonja R. West
The Fragility Of The Free American Press, Ronnell Anderson Jones, Sonja R. West
Scholarly Works
President Donald Trump has faced criticism for attacking the press and for abandoning longstanding traditions of accommodating and respecting it. This Essay argues that the national discussion spurred by Trump’s treatment of the press has fallen short of capturing the true seriousness of the situation. Trump’s assault on the custom of press accommodation follows a generation-long collapse of other major press protections. In order to fully understand the critical juncture at which American press freedom now stands, we must expand the discussion beyond talk of a rogue president’s aberrant attacks on the press and consider the increasingly fragile edifice on …
Freedom Of Speech And The Criminal Law, Dan T. Coenen
Freedom Of Speech And The Criminal Law, Dan T. Coenen
Scholarly Works
Because the Free Speech Clause limits government power to enact penal statutes, it has a close relationship to American criminal law. This Article explores that relationship at a time when a fast-growing “decriminalization movement” has taken hold across the nation. At the heart of the Article is the idea that free speech law has developed in ways that have positioned the Supreme Court to use that law to impose significant new limits on the criminalization of speech. More particularly, this article claims that the Court has developed three distinct decision-making strategies for decriminalizing speech based on constitutional principles. The first …
Money Power In Politics, Jonathan Peterson Fisher
Money Power In Politics, Jonathan Peterson Fisher
Senior Projects Spring 2017
Money power in politics has been bolstered over the last thirty years thanks to Supreme Court decisions that hinder the Federal Election Commission’s ability to regulate financial influences on campaigns. Increases in corporate ability to impact campaigns through independent expenditures are principally against democratic values as they create a political climate of inequality favoring wealthy speakers. Additionally, money power’s influences on campaigns lead to impacting policy both directly through access to politicians and indirectly through the broad success of pro-contributor candidates. With an inability to govern over money power in elections comes a trend of anti-majoritarian policies that are inherently …
The Supreme Court As Public Educator?, Frederick Schauer
The Supreme Court As Public Educator?, Frederick Schauer
University of Colorado Law Review
No abstract provided.
Transnational Constitution-Making: The Contribution Of The Venice Commission On Law And Democracy, Paul Craig
Transnational Constitution-Making: The Contribution Of The Venice Commission On Law And Democracy, Paul Craig
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Commission for Democracy through Law, better known as the Venice Commission. While part of the Council of Europe, the Venice Commission is much less understood than the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), notwithstanding the existing literature. This chapter therefore seeks to explicate and evaluate. It begins by explicating the organizational foundations of the Venice Commission, followed by analysis of its remit and role. The focus then shifts to triggering and working methodology.
The remainder of the article is concerned with evaluation of the Commission’s role in relation to constitution-making as broadly conceived, the analysis being situated within the literature …
John Stuart Mill And Political Correctness, Lackland H. Bloom Jr.
John Stuart Mill And Political Correctness, Lackland H. Bloom Jr.
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This article will examine Mill’s arguments in favor of unrestrained freedom of speech and his objection to the social censorship of speech. It will then discuss the origins and impact of what is now characterized as political correctness. The article will then define the concept of social censorship and attempt to distinguish pure social censorship from private tangible punishment of speech. Next, the article will examine the ways in which social censorship serves important social goals and promotes free speech as well as the ways in which it undermines free speech. It will especially focus on the damage to intellectual …