Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- St. John's University School of Law (47)
- Selected Works (34)
- Brooklyn Law School (21)
- University of Georgia School of Law (21)
- Fordham Law School (20)
-
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (15)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (15)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (11)
- Notre Dame Law School (11)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (11)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (9)
- William & Mary Law School (9)
- Brigham Young University Law School (7)
- University of San Diego (7)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (6)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (5)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (4)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- University of Miami Law School (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Barry University School of Law (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (3)
- St. Mary's University (3)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (81)
- Free speech (29)
- First amendment (23)
- Constitutional law (13)
- Freedom of speech (13)
-
- Supreme Court (13)
- Speech (12)
- Religion (11)
- Constitutional Law (9)
- Free Speech (9)
- Freedom of Speech (9)
- Internet (9)
- Constitution (8)
- Religious freedom (8)
- Privacy (7)
- RFRA (7)
- Campaign finance (6)
- Copyright (6)
- Fourteenth Amendment (6)
- Inc. (6)
- Religious liberty (6)
- Right of publicity (6)
- Fair use (5)
- Freedom of the Press (5)
- Hobby Lobby (5)
- Press (5)
- Social media (5)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (5)
- Commercial speech (4)
- Democracy (4)
- Publication
-
- The Catholic Lawyer (44)
- Faculty Scholarship (17)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (17)
- Touro Law Review (15)
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law (14)
-
- First Amendment Law Review (11)
- Journal of Law and Policy (11)
- Northwestern University Law Review (8)
- Notre Dame Law Review (8)
- Scholarly Works (8)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (7)
- Faculty Publications (7)
- San Diego Law Review (7)
- BYU Law Review (5)
- Richard W Garnett (5)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Catholic University Law Review (4)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (4)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (4)
- Nevada Law Journal (4)
- Publications (4)
- Scholarly Articles (4)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (4)
- Brooklyn Law Review (3)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (3)
- Popular Media (3)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (3)
- The University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal (3)
- Akron Intellectual Property Journal (2)
- Articles (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 343
Full-Text Articles in Law
Social Media Accountability For Terrorist Propaganda, Alexander Tsesis
Social Media Accountability For Terrorist Propaganda, Alexander Tsesis
Faculty Publications & Other Works
Terrorist organizations have found social media websites to be invaluable for disseminating ideology, recruiting terrorists, and planning operations. National and international leaders have repeatedly pointed out the dangers terrorists pose to ordinary people and state institutions. In the United States, the federal Communications Decency Act's § 230 provides social networking websites with immunity against civil law suits. Litigants have therefore been unsuccessful in obtaining redress against internet companies who host or disseminate third-party terrorist content. This Article demonstrates that § 230 does not bar private parties from recovery if they can prove that a social media company had received complaints …
Justice Scalia, The Establishment Clause, And Christian Privilege, Caroline Mala Corbin
Justice Scalia, The Establishment Clause, And Christian Privilege, Caroline Mala Corbin
Articles
No abstract provided.
Separation Of Church And State Or Disparate Treatment? An Analysis Of The Religious Freedom And Discrimination Concerns In Trinity Lutheran Church Of Columbia, Inc. V. Pauley, Michael Petherick
Tennessee Journal of Race, Gender, & Social Justice
No abstract provided.
The Terrorist's Veto: Why The First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals Of The Prophet Muhammad, Daniel Ortner
The Terrorist's Veto: Why The First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals Of The Prophet Muhammad, Daniel Ortner
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
No abstract provided.
Fighting Back Against Revenge Porn: A Legislative Solution, Alex Jacobs
Fighting Back Against Revenge Porn: A Legislative Solution, Alex Jacobs
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
No abstract provided.
When Religious Belief Becomes Scientific Opinion: Burwell V. Hobby Lobby And The Unraveling Of Federal Rule 702, Meredith Rachel Mandell
When Religious Belief Becomes Scientific Opinion: Burwell V. Hobby Lobby And The Unraveling Of Federal Rule 702, Meredith Rachel Mandell
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
No abstract provided.
Access To Communication In United States Prisons: Reducing Recidivism Through Expanded Communication Programs With Inmates, Lilie Gross
Politics & Government Undergraduate Theses
The need for better communication systems in prisons is dire and will reduce recidivism rates in the United States. Not only is communication via phone lines extremely expensive and corrupt, it is almost impossible. Inmates in United States Prisons need this availability and option to communicate with their families and maintain outside relationships. While maintaining healthy and positive relationships is good for inmate's mental health, it also decreases the risk of recidivism. This paper aims to highlight the benefits of phone communication and relationships between inmates and family on the outside for it will decrease the 50% recidivism rate that …
The Twilight Of Nonspeech, Bernard E. Gegan
Abortion Legislation And The Establishment Clause
Abortion Legislation And The Establishment Clause
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Church Tax Exemptions, William R. Consedine, Charles Whelan, S.J.
Church Tax Exemptions, William R. Consedine, Charles Whelan, S.J.
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Obscenity: The Intractable Legal Problem, John Cornelius Hayes
Obscenity: The Intractable Legal Problem, John Cornelius Hayes
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Rwu First Amendment Blog: Jenna Hashway's Blog: Blocking Women's March From Key D.C. Sites Risks Infringing On First Amendment Rights 12-12-2016, Jenna Wims Hashway, Roger Williams University
Rwu First Amendment Blog: Jenna Hashway's Blog: Blocking Women's March From Key D.C. Sites Risks Infringing On First Amendment Rights 12-12-2016, Jenna Wims Hashway, Roger Williams University
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
Defamation In Student Publications
Religious Freedom And The Church-State Relationship In Maryland, Kenneth L. Lasson
Religious Freedom And The Church-State Relationship In Maryland, Kenneth L. Lasson
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
The Functions Of The Constitution And The Establishment Clause, Richard O. Brooks
The Functions Of The Constitution And The Establishment Clause, Richard O. Brooks
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
An Unhurried Look At Obscenity, John M. Regan, C.M.
An Unhurried Look At Obscenity, John M. Regan, C.M.
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Vatican Ii On Religious Freedom, Msgr. John P. Kleinz
Vatican Ii On Religious Freedom, Msgr. John P. Kleinz
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
New York's "Minor" Obscenity Statute Held Constitutional
New York's "Minor" Obscenity Statute Held Constitutional
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Candor Or Shame? Defining Obscenity By Statute
Candor Or Shame? Defining Obscenity By Statute
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Sit-In Conduct Held Constitutionally Protected
Sit-In Conduct Held Constitutionally Protected
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
New York Times V. Sullivan - A Reappraisal
Newsroom: Rwu's News First Amendment Blog 12-07-2016, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Newsroom: Rwu's News First Amendment Blog 12-07-2016, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Rwu First Amendment Blog: David Logan's Blog: When Facts And News Diverge 12-2-2016, David A. Logan
Rwu First Amendment Blog: David Logan's Blog: When Facts And News Diverge 12-2-2016, David A. Logan
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
Protecting Hatred Preserves Freedom: Why Offensive Expressions Command Constitutional Protection, Andrew P. Napolitano
Protecting Hatred Preserves Freedom: Why Offensive Expressions Command Constitutional Protection, Andrew P. Napolitano
Journal of Law and Policy
The First Amendment is not the guardian of taste. Instead, the U.S. Constitution wholeheartedly protects freedom of thought and expression, even if generated and defined by hatred, as long as that expression does not produce immediate lawless violence. Although free speech may lead to tenuous relationships or uncomfortable debates, it must be defended unconditionally. Too many politicians and lawmakers believe that the freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment attaches only to those ideas and expressions that they approve of; this is not so. This article argues that the Founders intended the First Amendment's free speech principle as a …
Freedom Of Speech And Equality: Do We Have To Choose?, Nadine Strossen
Freedom Of Speech And Equality: Do We Have To Choose?, Nadine Strossen
Journal of Law and Policy
As a lifelong activist on behalf of both equality and free speech, I am convinced, based on actual experience, that these core values are mutually reinforcing, and not, as some have argued, in tension with each other. Moreover, I am convinced that this is true even for offensive or hateful speech that affronts our most cherished beliefs. However, defining hateful or offensive speech is inherently arbitrary and subjective, which raises concerns about what speech should be restricted, and how. Empowering government to punish hateful or offensive expresson necessarily vests officials with enormous discretionary power, which will inevitably lead to arbitrary …
Introduction; The Past, Present And Future Of Free Speech, Joel M. Gora
Introduction; The Past, Present And Future Of Free Speech, Joel M. Gora
Journal of Law and Policy
This short paper introduces the papers and commentary produced at two significant First Amendment occasions. First was a 40th anniversary celebration of the Supreme Court’s landmark 1976 decision in Buckley v. Valeo, the fountainhead ruling on the intersection between campaign finance restrictions and First Amendment rights. The questions were discussed provocatively by two of the leading players in that decision, James Buckley himself, now a retired United States Circuit Judge, and Ira Glasser, former head of the ACLU who helped organize a strange bedfellows, left-right coalition to challenge the new federal election campaign laws on First Amendment grounds. …
Free Speech Matters: The Roberts Court And The First Amendment, Joel M. Gora
Free Speech Matters: The Roberts Court And The First Amendment, Joel M. Gora
Journal of Law and Policy
This article contends that the Roberts Court, in the period from 2006 to 2016, arguably became the most speech-protective Supreme Court in memory. In a series of wide-ranging First Amendment decisions, the Court sounded and strengthened classic free speech themes and principles. Taken together, the Roberts Court’s decisions have left free speech rights much stronger than they were found.
Those themes and principles include a strong libertarian distrust of government regulation of speech and presumption in favor of letting people control speech, a consistent refusal to fashion new “non-speech” categories, a reluctance to “balance” free speech away against governmental interests, …
Where's The Fire?, Burt Neuborne
Where's The Fire?, Burt Neuborne
Journal of Law and Policy
Freedom of speech is priceless, but distressingly fragile. Life, and law, would be much simpler if we could react to free speech's importance and fragility by granting it absolute legal protection. Since, however, absolute protection of speech is not—and should not be—a serious option, we face the legal realist challenge of erecting a First Amendment legal structure capable of providing real-world protection to highly controversial speech, often by weak speakers, without closing the door to government regulation. Given the uncertainty inherent in applying fact-dependent complex rules in protean factual settings, many potential speakers would avoid being drawn into unpredictable and …