Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Contracts (4)
- Appellate courts (1)
- Assent (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Bankruptcy Act (1)
-
- BarillaAmerica Inc. v. Wright (1)
- Breach of Contract (1)
- Bridgestone/Firestone Inc. v. Lockhart (1)
- Contract (1)
- Contract law (1)
- Contract terms (1)
- Cyberspace (1)
- DoubleClick Inc. v. Henderson (1)
- Economic Espionage Act (1)
- Electronic commerce (1)
- Form (1)
- Freedom to fire (1)
- Freedom to leave (1)
- General knowledge (1)
- Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine (1)
- Insolvency (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Karl Llewellyn (1)
- Law & Economics (1)
- Lawler Mfg. Co. v. Bradley Corp. (1)
- Marietta Corp. v Fairhurst (1)
- Merck & Co. v. Lyon (1)
- Mortgages (1)
- Nancy Kim (1)
- Noncompetition agreements (1)
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Law
Statutory Liens And The Bankruptcy Act: U.C.C. § 2-702 And Section 67(C), Robert Green
Statutory Liens And The Bankruptcy Act: U.C.C. § 2-702 And Section 67(C), Robert Green
Robert A. Green
A Consent Theory Of Unconscionability: An Empirical Study Of Law In Action, Larry Dimatteo, Bruce Rich
A Consent Theory Of Unconscionability: An Empirical Study Of Law In Action, Larry Dimatteo, Bruce Rich
Larry A DiMatteo
This Article provides the findings of an empirical study of 187 court cases in which the issue of the unconscionability of a contract or a contract term was addressed by the courts. The cases were drawn from two time periods. The first set of cases can be viewed as the first generation of Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.)-style unconscionability cases from 1968-1980. The second generation of unconscionability cases were from the time period of 1991-2003. The two groups of cases allow us to not only analyze a series of questions and factors, but also to make intergenerational or longitudinal observations. The …
When Trade Secrets Become Shackles: Fairness And The Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine, Elizabeth Rowe
When Trade Secrets Become Shackles: Fairness And The Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine, Elizabeth Rowe
Elizabeth A Rowe
Critics of the inevitable disclosure doctrine decry the inconsistency with which courts rule on these cases, and the difficulty in predicting case outcomes. They contend that courts are left to "grapple with a decidedly ... nebulous standard of 'inevitability."' Further, they claim the doctrine undermines the employee's fundamental right to move freely and pursue his or her livelihood. Ultimately, both the problem and solution here are about fairness: fairness in the employer-employee relationship, fairness in the application of the law, and fairness in providing protection from unfair competition between competing employers. The crux of the opposition to the doctrine, in …
Carnival Cruise And The Contracting Of Everything, Nancy Kim
Carnival Cruise And The Contracting Of Everything, Nancy Kim
Nancy Kim
This short essay is about the potential unconscionablity of contracts between cruise lines and passengers.
Two Alternate Visions Of Contract Law In 2025, Nancy Kim
Two Alternate Visions Of Contract Law In 2025, Nancy Kim
Nancy Kim
Part I of this essay examines how businesses have shaped the evolution of contract’s form from the past to the present and ex-plains how courts have responded by reshaping contract law.1 Part II of this essay anticipates changes in the business landscape and explains how these changes might create new challenges for contract law. Part III predicts two alternative visions for contract law in 2025. The first is as a diminished body of law, made nearly irrelevant by other laws and preempted by private rules administered by non-judicial entities. The second vision is that of a robust contract law administered …
Bargaining Power And Background Law, Nancy Kim
Bargaining Power And Background Law, Nancy Kim
Nancy Kim
Power in contract law typically refers to the bargaining strength of each contracting party in relation to the other. In assessing the relative bargaining power of each party, courts and commentators often consider factors specific to the parties, such as socio-economic status and education level. In this Essay, I suggest another factor that affects the power of the parties in negotiating or modifying their agreement, one that I refer to as the "background law." The background law is the substantive law that governs the subject matter of the contract. This Essay focuses specifically on the background law of copyrights and …
Liability For Work Done Where Contract Is Denied: Contractual And Restitutionary Approaches, Man Yip, Yihan Goh
Liability For Work Done Where Contract Is Denied: Contractual And Restitutionary Approaches, Man Yip, Yihan Goh
Man YIP
No abstract provided.
Past Consideration Or Unconnected Consideration, Yihan Goh, Man Yip
Past Consideration Or Unconnected Consideration, Yihan Goh, Man Yip
Man YIP
It is trite law that a valid and enforceable contract must be supported by consideration. The recent Court of Appeal case of Rainforest Trading Ltd v State Bank of India Singapore [2012] 2 SLR 713 is a further addition to the local jurisprudence on consideration, specifically the issue of past consideration. This note considers the specific issue of past consideration and argues that its label should be discarded in favour of a more realistic one that correctly emphasises its underlying concerns.
You Do Have To Keep Promises: A Disgorgement Theory Of Contract Remedies, Steve Thel, Peter Siegelman
You Do Have To Keep Promises: A Disgorgement Theory Of Contract Remedies, Steve Thel, Peter Siegelman
Peter Siegelman
Contract law is generally understood to require no more of a person who breaches a contract than to give the injured promisee the “benefit of the bargain.” The law is thus assumed to permit a promise-breaker to keep any profit remaining from breach, after putting the victim in the position he would have been in had the promise been performed. This conventional description is radically wrong: across a wide range of circumstances, standard contract doctrines actually do require people to keep their promises, or to disgorge their entire profit from breach if they do not. Rather than protecting the expectation …
Notice, Assent, And Form In A 140 Character World, Juliet Moringiello
Notice, Assent, And Form In A 140 Character World, Juliet Moringiello
Juliet M Moringiello
This essay is a contribution to a symposium on Professor Nancy Kim’s terrific book, Wrap Contracts: Foundations and Ramifications. In the book, Prof. Kim examines this explosion in volume of online contract terms and offers some suggestions for improving the judicial approach to these terms. Despite the ease of presenting online terms in a visually appealing format, today’s electronically presented terms are even less comprehensible than those of fifteen years ago. At the same time that individuals have become accustomed to receiving information in small doses due to the proliferation of social media platforms such as Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and …
When Does Some Federal Interest Require A Different Result?: An Essay On The Use And Misuse Of Butner V. United States, Juliet Moringiello
When Does Some Federal Interest Require A Different Result?: An Essay On The Use And Misuse Of Butner V. United States, Juliet Moringiello
Juliet M Moringiello
Thousands of judges and scholars have relied on the statement in the 1979 Supreme Court opinion in Butner v. United States that “property interests are created and defined by state law . . . unless some federal interest requires a different result.” Often, they cite to the statement as a policy constraint that elevates state property law over federal bankruptcy law. This Essay, written for the American Bankruptcy Institute – University of Illinois Symposium on Chapter 11 Reform, posits that the Butner rule is not as broadly applicable as commonly believed. To do so, the Essay surveys some notable uses …