Law Commons^™

Rights, Respect, Responsibility: Advancing The Sexual And Reproductive Health And Rights Of Young People Through International Human Rights Law, Janine Kossen

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change

No abstract provided.

Mediation Of Special Education Disputes In Pennsylvania, Sonja Kerr, Jenai St. Hill

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change

No abstract provided.

Colorblind Education Reform: How Race-Neutral Policies Perpetuate Segregation And Why Voluntary Integration Should Be Put Back On The Reform Agenda, Jamie Gullen

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change

No abstract provided.

Youth Courts: Lawyers Helping Students Make Better Decisions, Gregory Volz, David Keller Trevaskis, Rachel Miller

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change

No abstract provided.

Against All Odds: Community And Policy Solutions To Address The American Youth Crisis, Kisha Bird

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change

No abstract provided.

Antitrust And The 'Filed Rate' Doctrine: Deregulation And State Action, Herbert J. Hovenkamp

All Faculty Scholarship

In its Keogh decision the Supreme Court held that although the Interstate Commerce Act did not exempt railroads from antitrust liability, a private plaintiff may not recover treble damages based on an allegedly monopolistic tariff rate filed with a federal agency. Keogh very likely grew out of Justice Brandeis's own zeal for regulation and his concern for the protection of small business — in this case, mainly shippers whom he felt were protected from discrimination by filed rates. The Supreme Court's Square D decision later conceded that Keogh may have been “unwise as a matter of policy,” but reaffirmed it …

Antitrust And Nonexcluding Ties, Herbert J. Hovenkamp

All Faculty Scholarship

Notwithstanding hundreds of court decisions, tying arrangements remain enigmatic. Conclusions that go to either extreme, per se legality or per se illegality, invariably make simplifying assumptions that frequently do not obtain. For example, by ignoring double marginalization or tying product price cuts it becomes very easy to prove that a wide range of ties are anticompetitive. At the other extreme, by ignoring foreclosure possibilities one can readily conclude that ties are invariably benign.

Ties have historically been thought to produce two kinds of competitive harm: “leverage,” or extraction; and foreclosure, or exclusion. The two theories are not mutually exclusive. Indeed, …

Comparative Antitrust Federalism: Review Of Cengiz, Antitrust Federalism In The Eu And The Us, Herbert J. Hovenkamp

All Faculty Scholarship

This brief essay reviews Firat Cengiz’s book Antitrust Federalism in the EU and the US (2012), which compares the role of federalism in the competition law of the European Union and the United States. Both of these systems are “federal,” of course, because both have individual nation-states (Europe) or states (US) with their own individual competition provisions, but also an overarching competition law that applies to the entire group. This requires a certain amount of cooperation with respect to both territorial reach and substantive coverage.

Cengiz distinguishes among “markets,” “hierarchies,” and “networks” as forms of federalism. Markets are the least …

Whose Regulatory Interests? Outsourcing The Treaty Function, Stephen B. Burbank

All Faculty Scholarship

In this article I describe the status quo in the area of foreign judgment recognition, with attention to the tension between domestic interests and international cooperation. Precisely because the future of the status quo is in doubt, I then consider current proposals for change, particularly the effort to implement the Hague Choice of Court Convention in the United States. Prominent among the normative questions raised by my account is whose interests, in addition to the litigants’ interests, are at stake – those of the United States, those of the several states, or those of interest groups waving a federal or …

Pure Software In An Impure World? Winny, Japan's First P2p Case, Ridwan Khan

East Asia Law Review

In 2011, Japan’s Supreme Court decided its first contributory infringement peer-to-peer case, involving Isamu Kaneko and his popular file-sharing program, Winny. This program was used in Japan to distribute many copyrighted works, including movies, video games, and music. At the district court level, Kaneko was found guilty of contributory infringement, fined 1.5 million yen, and sentenced to one year in prison. However, the Osaka High Court reversed the district court and found for Kaneko. The High Court decision was then affirmed by the Supreme Court, which settled on a contributory infringement standard based on fault, similar to the standard announced …

Natural Law, Slavery, And The Right To Privacy Tort, Anita L. Allen

All Faculty Scholarship

In 1905 the Supreme Court of Georgia became the first state high court to recognize a freestanding “right to privacy” tort in the common law. The landmark case was Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Co. Must it be a cause for deep jurisprudential concern that the common law right to privacy in wide currency today originated in Pavesich’s explicit judicial interpretation of the requirements of natural law? Must it be an additional worry that the court which originated the common law privacy right asserted that a free white man whose photograph is published without his consent in …

War On The Korean Peninsula? Application Of Jus In Bello In The Cheonan And Yeonpyeong Island Attacks, Seunghyun Sally Nam

East Asia Law Review

The media often reports that the Korean Peninsula is ‘technically at war’, but there is still uncertainty surrounding the issue of whether the Korean Peninsula is, as a matter of law, in a state of war. This legal issue has now become particularly important as the International Criminal Court released a statement on December 6, 2010 in which it opened a preliminary examination of whether the sinking of the South Korean warship, the Cheonan, which was found to be a result of a torpedo attack from a North Korean submarine, and artillery attacks from North Korea that occurred near Yeonpyeong …

Courtroom Drama With Chinese Characteristics: A Comparative Approach To Legal Process In Chinese Cinema, Stephen Mcintyre

East Asia Law Review

While previous “law and film” scholarship has concentrated mainly on Hollywood films, this article examines legal themes in Chinese cinema. It argues that Chinese films do not simply mimic Western conventions when portraying the courtroom, but draw upon a centuries-old, indigenous tradition of “court case” (gong’an) melodrama. Like Hollywood cinema, gong’an drama seizes upon the dramatic and narrative potential of legal trials. Yet, while Hollywood trial films turn viewers into jurors, pushing them back and forth between the competing stories that emerge from the adversarial process, gong’an drama eschews any recognition of opposing narratives, instead centering on the punishment of …

Can The States Keep Secrets From The Federal Government, Robert A. Mikos

University of Pennsylvania Law Review

No abstract provided.

Tailoring Discovery: Using Nontranssubstantive Rules To Reduce Waste And Abuse, Joshua M. Koppel

University of Pennsylvania Law Review

No abstract provided.

Take Care That The Laws Be Faithfully Litigated, Parker Rider-Longmaid

University of Pennsylvania Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Striking Success Of The National Labor Relations Act, Michael L. Wachter

All Faculty Scholarship

Although often viewed as a dismal failure, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) has been remarkably successful. While the decline in private sector unionization since the 1950s is typically viewed as a symbol of this failure, the NLRA has achieved its most important goal: industrial peace.

Before the NLRA and the 1947 Taft-Hartley Amendments, our industrial relations system gave rise to frequent and violent strikes that threatened the nation’s stability. For example, in the late 1870s, the Great Railroad Strike spread throughout a number of major cities. In Pittsburg alone, strikes claimed 24 lives, nearly 80 buildings, and over 2,000 …

Neoclassical Labor Economics: Its Implications For Labor And Employment Law, Michael L. Wachter

All Faculty Scholarship

Whereas law and economics appears throughout business law, it never caught on in legal commentary about labor and employment law. A major reason is that the goals of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), the country’s foundational labor law, are at war with basic principles of economics. The lack of integration is unfortunate if understandable. Notwithstanding the NLRA’s normative goal to keep wages out of competition, economic analysis applies as centrally to labor markets as to any other market.

One of the NLRA’s primary goals is to equalize bargaining power. Its drafters envisioned achieving this goal through procedural and substantive …

Leaving The Bench, 1970-2009: The Choices Federal Judges Make, What Influences Those Choices, And Their Consequences, Stephen B. Burbank, S. Jay Plager, Gregory Ablavsky

All Faculty Scholarship

This article explores the decisions that, over four decades, lower federal court judges have made when considering leaving the bench, the influences on those decisions, and their potential consequences for the federal judiciary and society. A multi-method research strategy enabled the authors to describe more precisely than previous scholarship such matters of interest as the role that judges in senior status play in the contemporary federal judiciary, the rate at which federal judges are retiring from the bench (rather than assuming, or after assuming, senior status), and the reasons why some federal judges remain in regular active service instead of …

Competition And Innovation In Copyright And The Dmca, Herbert J. Hovenkamp

All Faculty Scholarship

This book of CASES AND MATERIALS ON INNOVATION AND COMPETITION POLICY is intended for educational use. The book is free for all to use subject to an open source license agreement. It differs from IP/antitrust casebooks in that it considers numerous sources of competition policy in addition to antitrust, including those that emanate from the intellectual property laws themselves, and also related issues such as the relationship between market structure and innovation, the competitive consequences of regulatory rules governing technology competition such as net neutrality and interconnection, misuse, the first sale doctrine, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Chapters …

The Effect Of Private Police On Crime: Evidence From A Geographic Regression Discontinuity Design, John M. Macdonald, Jonathan Klick, Ben Grunwald

All Faculty Scholarship

Research demonstrates that police reduce crime. The implication of this research for investment in a particular form of extra police services, those provided by private institutions, has not been rigorously examined. We capitalize on the discontinuity in police force size at the geographic boundary of a private university police department to estimate the effect of the extra police services on crime. Extra police provided by the university generate approximately 45-60 percent fewer crimes in the surrounding neighborhood. These effects appear to be similar to other estimates in the literature.

The Missed Opportunity Of United States V. Jones: Commercial Erosion Of Fourth Amendment Protection In A Post-Google Earth World, Mary G. Leary

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law

No abstract provided.

The Inalienable Right Of Publicity, Jennifer E. Rothman

All Faculty Scholarship

This article challenges the conventional wisdom that the right of publicity is universally and uncontroversially alienable. Courts and scholars have routinely described the right as a freely transferable property right, akin to patents or copyrights. Despite such broad claims of unfettered alienability, courts have limited the transferability of publicity rights in a variety of instances. No one has developed a robust account of why such limits should exist or what their contours should be. This article remedies this omission and concludes that the right of publicity must have significantly limited alienability to protect the rights of individuals to control the …

Can You Handle The Truth? Compelled Commercial Speech And The First Amendment, Jenniver M. Keighley

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law

No abstract provided.

Due Process Limitations On Rule 23(B)(2) Monetary Remedies: Examining The Source Of The Limitation In Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. V. Dukes, Megan E. Barriger

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law

No abstract provided.

Padilla V. Kentucky: Overcoming Teague's "Watershed" Exception To Non-Retroactivity, Jennifer H. Berman

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law

No abstract provided.

Equality Federalism: A Solution To The Marriage Wars, Mae Kuykendall

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law

No abstract provided.

Diversity Within Racial Groups And The Constitutionality Of Race-Conscious Admissions, Vinay Harpalani

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law

No abstract provided.

The Normativity Of Copying In Copyright Law, Shyamkrishna Balganesh

All Faculty Scholarship

Not all copying constitutes copyright infringement. Quite independent of fair use, copyright law requires that an act of copying be qualitatively and quantitatively significant enough or “substantially similar” for it to be actionable. Originating in the nineteenth century, and entirely the creation of courts, copyright’s requirement of “substantial similarity” has thus far received little attention as an independently meaningful normative dimension of the copyright entitlement. This Article offers a novel theory for copyright’s substantial-similarity requirement by placing it firmly at the center of the institution and its various goals and purposes. As a common-law-style device that mirrors the functioning of …

Incompetent Plea Bargaining And Extrajudicial Reforms, Stephanos Bibas

All Faculty Scholarship

Last year, in Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye, a five-to-four majority of the Supreme Court held that incompetent lawyering that causes a defendant to reject a plea offer can constitute deficient performance, and the resulting loss of a favorable plea bargain can constitute cognizable prejudice, under the Sixth Amendment. This commentary, published as part of the Harvard Law Review’s Supreme Court issue, analyzes both decisions. The majority and dissenting opinions almost talked past each other, reaching starkly different conclusions because they started from opposing premises: contemporary and pragmatic versus historical and formalist. Belatedly, the Court noticed …