Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- International Court of Justice (2)
- African-American history (1)
- Article 60 of the Statute of the Court (1)
- Atlantic slave trade (1)
- Avena Judgment (1)
-
- Chemical Regulation (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Critical race theory (1)
- Executive branch (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- ICJ (1)
- International Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Legal claims (1)
- Legal interests (1)
- Medellin v. Texas (1)
- Mexican nationals (1)
- Originalism (1)
- REACH (1)
- Slavery (1)
- TSCA (1)
- U.S. Supreme Court (1)
- Vienna Convention (1)
- Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1)
- Yale School of international law (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Book Review: Henry J. Richardson Iii, The Origins Of African-American Interests In International Law, D. A. Jeremy Telman
Book Review: Henry J. Richardson Iii, The Origins Of African-American Interests In International Law, D. A. Jeremy Telman
Law Faculty Publications
This short review evaluates Professor Richardson's book both as a contribution to the history of the Atlantic slave trade and as contribution to critical race theory.
Professor Richardson has read innumerable historical monographs, works of legal and sociological theory, international law and critical race theory. Armed with this store of knowledge, he is able to recount a detailed narrative of African-American claims to, interests in and appeals to international law over approximately two centuries spanning, with occasional peeks both forward and backward in time, from the landing of the first African slaves at Jamestown in 1619 to the 1815 Treaty …
Medellin And Originalism, D. A. Jeremy Telman
Medellin And Originalism, D. A. Jeremy Telman
Law Faculty Publications
In Medellin v. Texas, the Supreme Court permitted Texas to proceed with the execution of a Mexican national who, in violation of the United States’ obligations under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, had not been given timely notice of his rights of consular notification and consultation. It did so despite its finding that the United States had an obligation under treaty law to comply with an order of the International Court of Justice that Medellin’s case be granted review and reconsideration. The international obligation, the Court found, was not domestically enforceable because the treaties at issue were not self-executing. …
Jumping The Pond: Transnational Law And The Future Of Chemical Regulation, Noah M. Sachs
Jumping The Pond: Transnational Law And The Future Of Chemical Regulation, Noah M. Sachs
Law Faculty Publications
Just as domestic pollution can cause transnational externalities, domestic environmental regulation can create transnational ripple effects in other jurisdictions. In this Article, I show how chemical regulation-long a weak link in the network of U.S. environmental laws-is about to be reshaped and reformed through the extraterritorial ripple effects of new European Union legislation. Contributing to both international law and environmental law scholarship, this Article shows how transnational information flows can be harnessed to end the longstanding drought of data on chemical toxicity in the United States. ·
Part I of this Article critiques the U.S. chemical regulatory regime, arguing that …
Introductory Note To International Court Of Justice: Decision On The Request For Interpretation Of The Avena Judgment, Chiara Giorgetti
Introductory Note To International Court Of Justice: Decision On The Request For Interpretation Of The Avena Judgment, Chiara Giorgetti
Law Faculty Publications
On 19 January 2009, the International Court of Justice ("ICJ" or "the Court") issued its Judgment On the Request for the Interpretation of the Avena Judgment ("Judgment") denying Mexico's request for interpretation, and holding that the matters claimed by Mexico "are not matters which ha[d] been decided by the Court in its Judgment," and thus could not give rise to an interpretation as requested by 2Mexico.' This is probably the last step in a complex and lengthy litigation between Mexico and United States,2 which began on January 9, 2003, when Mexico instituted proceedings at the ICJ against the U.S. for …