Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2006

Journal

Intellectual Property Law

Institution
Keyword
Publication
File Type

Articles 1 - 30 of 241

Full-Text Articles in Law

Reversing The Reversal Rate: Using Real Property Principles To Guide Federal Circuit Patent Jurisprudence, Paul M. Schoenhard Dec 2006

Reversing The Reversal Rate: Using Real Property Principles To Guide Federal Circuit Patent Jurisprudence, Paul M. Schoenhard

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Recent Trends Underscoring International Trade Commission Review Of Initial Determinations And Federal Circuit Appeals From Final Commission Determinations Under Section 337 Of The Tariff Act Of 1930, Robert A. Caplen Dec 2006

Recent Trends Underscoring International Trade Commission Review Of Initial Determinations And Federal Circuit Appeals From Final Commission Determinations Under Section 337 Of The Tariff Act Of 1930, Robert A. Caplen

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


The First Amendment Versus Operational Security: Where Should The Milblogging Balance Lie?, Katherine C. Den Bleyker Dec 2006

The First Amendment Versus Operational Security: Where Should The Milblogging Balance Lie?, Katherine C. Den Bleyker

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


The Economics Of Cultural Misrepresentation: How Should The Indian Arts And Crafts Act Of 1990 Be Marketed?, Jennie D. Woltz Dec 2006

The Economics Of Cultural Misrepresentation: How Should The Indian Arts And Crafts Act Of 1990 Be Marketed?, Jennie D. Woltz

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


The Hoods Who Move The Goods: An Examination Of The Booming International Trade In Counterfeit Luxury Goods And An Assessment Of The American Efforts To Curtail Its Proliferation, Sam Cocks Dec 2006

The Hoods Who Move The Goods: An Examination Of The Booming International Trade In Counterfeit Luxury Goods And An Assessment Of The American Efforts To Curtail Its Proliferation, Sam Cocks

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Independent Invention As A Defense To Patent Infringement, Samson Vermont Dec 2006

Independent Invention As A Defense To Patent Infringement, Samson Vermont

Michigan Law Review

Under current law, independent invention is no defense to patent infringement. This Article argues that independent invention should be a defense, provided the independent inventor creates the invention before receiving actual or constructive notice that someone else already created it. The defense reduces wasteful duplication of effort and enhances dissemination of inventions without lowering the incentive to invent below the necessary minimum. To be sure, the defense lowers the incentive for inventions that face significant odds of being invented by more than one inventor By enabling a second inventor to compete with a first inventor the defense essentially breaks up …


Newsgroups Float Into Safe Harbor, And Copyright Holders Are Sunk, Alicia L. Wright Nov 2006

Newsgroups Float Into Safe Harbor, And Copyright Holders Are Sunk, Alicia L. Wright

Duke Law & Technology Review

Usenet newsgroups are swiftly becoming a popular vehicle for pirating digital music, movies, books, and other copyrighted works. Meanwhile, courts ignore Usenet’s tremendous potential for copyright infringement. In Ellison v. Robertson, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that America Online’s Usenet service might qualify for safe harbor under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. According to the district court below, safe harbor would preclude a finding of secondary copyright infringement against America Online. However, the courts misinterpreted the safe harbor provisions. One safe harbor provision was misapplied and another was ignored altogether. This iBrief critiques the Ellison opinions and analyzes …


Bollywood Is Coming! Copyright And Film Industry Issues Regarding International Film Co-Productions Involving India, Timm Neu Nov 2006

Bollywood Is Coming! Copyright And Film Industry Issues Regarding International Film Co-Productions Involving India, Timm Neu

San Diego International Law Journal

These developments and mutual correlating interests underscore the rising trend in the number of international co-productions and cinematographic co-operations with India. Still, the practice of movie making in India differs in many ways from industry structures in the U.S. or Germany, which shall be analyzed as potential co-production partners. Contractual relations, industry regulations, involved parties, and the legal rules are so distinct, that a comparative view from a producer's perspective shall bring into light the frameworks and copyright issues of international film co-productions involving India.


The Procompetitive Interest In Intellectual Property Law, Thomas F. Cotter Nov 2006

The Procompetitive Interest In Intellectual Property Law, Thomas F. Cotter

William & Mary Law Review

When government recognizes intellectual property (IP) rights, it is often viewed as sanctioning the existence of private "monopolies," in contrast to the general antimonopoly thrust of the antitrust laws. And yet, on occasion IP law itself condemns conduct on the part of IP owners-or excuses otherwise infringing activity on the part of IP defendants-expressly for the purpose of promoting competition. It does so even though antitrust law -if one were to apply it at all under analogous circumstances-would not find anticompetitive harm without conducting a more thorough analysis of whether the antitrust defendant possesses power over a well-defined market. Salient …


Product-By-Process Patent Claim Construction: Resolving The Federal Circuit’S Conflicting Precedent, Gregory S. Maskel Oct 2006

Product-By-Process Patent Claim Construction: Resolving The Federal Circuit’S Conflicting Precedent, Gregory S. Maskel

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Three Reactions To Mgm V. Grokster, Pamela Samuelson Oct 2006

Three Reactions To Mgm V. Grokster, Pamela Samuelson

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review

It was prescient of the Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review to have organized a conference to discuss the Supreme Court's decision in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. Grokster, Inc. As the articles in this issue reveal, commentators have had somewhat mixed reactions to the Grokster decision. Perhaps I am the most mixed (or mixed up) about Grokster among its commentators, for I have had not just one but three reactions to the Grokster decision. My first reaction was to question whether MGM and its co-plaintiffs really won the Grokster case, or at least won it in the way they had hoped. …


File Sharing, Copyright, And The Optimal Production Of Music, Gerald R. Faulhaber Oct 2006

File Sharing, Copyright, And The Optimal Production Of Music, Gerald R. Faulhaber

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review

Much economic, political, judicial and legal attention has been showered on the significant changes currently taking place within the music production and distribution business forced by the use of the Internet for both file sharing (of unauthorized copyrighted material) and more recent online (legal) music distribution. The strong demand for music, coupled with the low cost of distributing illegal copies via peer-to-peer (P2P) systems, is unraveling the business model by which music has traditionally been created, developed, and distributed. Application of traditional copyright law has been ineffective in stopping the loss of business in the traditional channels. Producers have implemented …


The Intent Element Of Inducement To Infringe Under Patent Law: Reflections On Grokster, Lynda J. Oswald Oct 2006

The Intent Element Of Inducement To Infringe Under Patent Law: Reflections On Grokster, Lynda J. Oswald

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review

In June, 2005, the United States Supreme Court set forth an "inducement" rule in MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. that imposes secondary liability on "one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement." The Court emphasized the limitations of the liability standard it was setting forth, stating that the target was only "purposeful, culpable expression and conduct, and thus does nothing to compromise legitimate commerce or discourage innovation having a lawful promise." Yet, the liability standard set forth in Grokster …


Trends In Protection For Informational Works Under Copyright Law During The 19th And 20th Centuries, Miriam Bitton Oct 2006

Trends In Protection For Informational Works Under Copyright Law During The 19th And 20th Centuries, Miriam Bitton

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review

The debate over databases protection has failed to identify and discuss some of its most basic and preliminary assumptions, accepting instead many of the historical aspects involved as given. This Article therefore seeks to challenge these underlying assumptions by providing a fresh look at the historical dimension of the debate. One common argument regarding database protection is that the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Feist v. Rural Publications Inc. brought about a dramatic change in the legal landscape, displacing the then-accepted "sweat of the brow" rationale for protecting rights in databases. This Article's historical analysis therefore thoroughly examines the treatment …


Why Pharmaceutical Firms Support Patent Trolls: The Disparate Impact Of Ebay V. Mercexchange On Innovation, Jeremiah S. Helm Oct 2006

Why Pharmaceutical Firms Support Patent Trolls: The Disparate Impact Of Ebay V. Mercexchange On Innovation, Jeremiah S. Helm

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review

Before the unanimous decision in eBay v. MercExchange, patent holders were almost always granted an injunction against an infringer. In fact, the Federal Circuit, in deciding eBay, noted that, upon a finding of infringement, an injunction would issue unless there were extraordinary circumstances. The Court, in a brief opinion, disagreed with the Federal Circuit and explained that the injunction issue in a patent case must be analyzed under the traditional four-factor test.[...] Is the four-factor test fairer or better than the Federal Circuit's near-automatic injunction rule? It is certainly more difficult to administer a factor test as compared to a …


The Temporal Dynamics Of Capable Of Substantial Noninfringing Uses, R. Anthony Reese Oct 2006

The Temporal Dynamics Of Capable Of Substantial Noninfringing Uses, R. Anthony Reese

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review

The copyright issues raised by "dual-use" technologies--equipment that can be used both in ways that infringe copyright and in ways that do not--first gained prominence in connection with the litigation over videocassette recorders that culminated in the Supreme Court's decision in Sony in 1984. Copyright owners had asserted that Sony's manufacture and distribution of VCRs rendered it liable for copyright infringement committed by customers using their Sony VCRs. The Supreme Court in Sony concluded that copyright law did not impose such secondary liability where the device in question was capable of substantial noninfringing uses (and that the VCR was such …


The Half-Fairness Of Google's Plan To Make The World's Collection Of Books Searchable, Steven Hetcher Oct 2006

The Half-Fairness Of Google's Plan To Make The World's Collection Of Books Searchable, Steven Hetcher

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review

Google's major new initiative is to undertake the task of digitizing the world's collection of books so as to make them searchable. The very idea is audacious, but what is more so is that Google plans to copy without first seeking the permission of the owners of these works. Google Print would make available what is, by conventional measures at least, the highest grade of information--books produced by millions of the world's leading scholars. This is in stark contrast to the inconsistent quality spectrum one encounters through other online sources such as peer-to-peer networks and blogs, where there currently exists …


21st Century Copyright Law In The Digital Domain Symposium Transcript, Symposium Panelists Oct 2006

21st Century Copyright Law In The Digital Domain Symposium Transcript, Symposium Panelists

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review

21st Century Copyright Law in the Digital Domain Symposium held at Universtiy of Michigan Law School Friday, March 24, 2006


Intellectual Property Rights In Advertising, Lisa P. Ramsey Oct 2006

Intellectual Property Rights In Advertising, Lisa P. Ramsey

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review

Before the twentieth century, U.S. courts refused to protect copyright in advertisements. Until the middle of the twentieth century, advertising slogans generally were not registered or protected under U.S. trademark law. Today, firms can acquire copyright protection in advertising and there is no categorical rule against trademark registration or protection of slogans. This Article questions whether this extension of copyright protection to advertising and trademark protection to slogans has a satisfactory utilitarian justification[...] If it is too difficult to completely eliminate copyright protection of advertising, Congress should at least consider reducing such protection to increase the free flow of advertising …


The Fcc's Indecent Proposal: Copyright Implications Of The Proposed "Record And Retain" Rule, Christopher S. Reed Oct 2006

The Fcc's Indecent Proposal: Copyright Implications Of The Proposed "Record And Retain" Rule, Christopher S. Reed

Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Right Of Publicity: The Right Of Publicity Fair Use Doctrine - Adopting A Better Standard, Andrew Koo Oct 2006

Right Of Publicity: The Right Of Publicity Fair Use Doctrine - Adopting A Better Standard, Andrew Koo

Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Do As I Say, Not As I Do: An International And Comparative Study Of Governments' Rights To "Infringe" Patents In Light Of The Federal Circuit's Recent Interpretation Of 28 U.S.C. § 1498 And A Call For Congress To Modernize The Statute, Blake Evan Reese Oct 2006

Do As I Say, Not As I Do: An International And Comparative Study Of Governments' Rights To "Infringe" Patents In Light Of The Federal Circuit's Recent Interpretation Of 28 U.S.C. § 1498 And A Call For Congress To Modernize The Statute, Blake Evan Reese

Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal

No abstract provided.


What Copyright Is: Time To Remember The Basics, Lior Zemer Oct 2006

What Copyright Is: Time To Remember The Basics, Lior Zemer

Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Ebay V. Mercexchange As A Sign Of Things To Come: Is The Supreme Court Still Reluctant To Hear Patent Cases?, Peter O. Huang Oct 2006

Ebay V. Mercexchange As A Sign Of Things To Come: Is The Supreme Court Still Reluctant To Hear Patent Cases?, Peter O. Huang

The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process

No abstract provided.


Intellectual Property - Copyright & Internet Law - "The Big Chill": The Supreme Court Adopts An Inducement Standard For Third-Party Copyright Infringement Liability, Leaving Innovation In The Cold Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. V. Grokster, Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 2764 (2005)., Darrin Keith Henning Oct 2006

Intellectual Property - Copyright & Internet Law - "The Big Chill": The Supreme Court Adopts An Inducement Standard For Third-Party Copyright Infringement Liability, Leaving Innovation In The Cold Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. V. Grokster, Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 2764 (2005)., Darrin Keith Henning

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

A key feature of an effective copyright system is to provide protection against infringement that is consistent with a copyright's goal: to "promote . . . useful Arts." Thus, for the overall public good, it is vital to achieve a proper balance between protecting authors' works as an incentive to create and the public's interest in accessing both creative works and new technology. The outcome of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. (Grosker III) and the resulting business and legal developments created ambiguity and doubt regarding potential liability in the copyright system that is having a deleterious effect on technical …


Poker Flops Under New York Law, Bennett M. Liebman Oct 2006

Poker Flops Under New York Law, Bennett M. Liebman

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Legal Frameworks And Technological Protection Of Digital Content: Moving Forward Towards A Best Practice Model, Urs Gasser Oct 2006

Legal Frameworks And Technological Protection Of Digital Content: Moving Forward Towards A Best Practice Model, Urs Gasser

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Outsourcing The Fire Of Genius: The Effects Of Patent Infringement Jurisprudence On Pharmaceutical Drug Development, Katherine A. Helm Oct 2006

Outsourcing The Fire Of Genius: The Effects Of Patent Infringement Jurisprudence On Pharmaceutical Drug Development, Katherine A. Helm

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


A Million Little Maybes: The James Frey Scandal And Statements On A Book Cover Or Jacket As Commercial Speech, Samantha J. Katze Oct 2006

A Million Little Maybes: The James Frey Scandal And Statements On A Book Cover Or Jacket As Commercial Speech, Samantha J. Katze

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Fairly Used: Why Google’S Book Project Should Prevail Under The Fair Use Defense, Melanie Costantino Oct 2006

Fairly Used: Why Google’S Book Project Should Prevail Under The Fair Use Defense, Melanie Costantino

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.