Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2006

Tax Law

IRS

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Substance Over Form? Phantom Regulations And The Internal Revenue Code, Amandeep S. Grewal Jul 2006

Substance Over Form? Phantom Regulations And The Internal Revenue Code, Amandeep S. Grewal

ExpressO

This paper addresses the appropriate response to tax statutes that call for the issuance of regulations, but that have been ignored by the Secretary. The courts and the IRS have taken the unusual step of treating these statutes as self-executing, notwithstanding the absence of regulations, and have invoked phantom regulations to enforce the statutes. Several commentators have analyzed the Tax Court's and the IRS's approaches, but have focused mostly on cases interpreting delegations found in the Internal Revenue Code. Because those cases themselves are inconsistent, it is not possible to extract a clear rule from analysis of those cases alone. …


Personal And Political Bias In The Debate Over Federal Income Taxation Rates And Progressivity, Richard J. Kovach Jan 2006

Personal And Political Bias In The Debate Over Federal Income Taxation Rates And Progressivity, Richard J. Kovach

Akron Tax Journal

Unlike the commentaries of flat tax proponents, this article will not attempt to dispel the notion of progressive taxation. Rather, this article will first question whether professors who write about tax policy can as a group reach unbiased conclusions about progressivity policy. Next, this article will address a few progressivity concepts that fuel taxation debates. Finally, this commentary will outline some ideas for structuring the federal income taxation system in ways that reduce political rancor and potentially create reasonable acceptance by tax producers, tax beneficiaries, and their respective advocates.


Taxation Of Below-Market Loans Under 7872: This Could Be A Lot Simpler!, John A. Lynch Jr. Jan 2006

Taxation Of Below-Market Loans Under 7872: This Could Be A Lot Simpler!, John A. Lynch Jr.

Akron Tax Journal

This article will explore § 7872: what it is, why it was enacted, how it has developed judicially and administratively since its enactment, and how it might be improved - mostly by reducing its complexity. It shall be contended generally that the "reform" intended with respect to § 7872 in several instances overshot the mark and serves no useful purpose.


Attaining U.S. Effectively Connected Income In The Aftermath Of The American Jobs Creation Act Of 2004 And Its Aim To Repeal Extraterritorial Income Exclusion, David Lebron Jan 2006

Attaining U.S. Effectively Connected Income In The Aftermath Of The American Jobs Creation Act Of 2004 And Its Aim To Repeal Extraterritorial Income Exclusion, David Lebron

Akron Tax Journal

This paper seeks to propose the construction of ways to facilitate investment in the United States, a suggested mapping, if you will. To that point where U.S. source income is created, it becomes imperative to effect some balance and accomplish an offset regarding the projected decrease in federal revenues resulting from the provisions within the Act, estimated at net $14.5 billion through year 2009, $5.7 billion accounted for in 2005 alone.


Bright Line, Dim Prospects: Grupo Dataflux V. Atlas Global Group, L.P. Reaffirms A Bright Line Barrier To Diversity Jurisdiction For Limited Partnerships And Other Unincorporated Entities, Amy Friedmann Jan 2006

Bright Line, Dim Prospects: Grupo Dataflux V. Atlas Global Group, L.P. Reaffirms A Bright Line Barrier To Diversity Jurisdiction For Limited Partnerships And Other Unincorporated Entities, Amy Friedmann

Akron Tax Journal

This Note examines how these two policy decisions changed the landscape of diversity jurisdiction for limited partnerships and other unincorporated entities. It argues that, despite the Grupo majority's expressed rationale of adhering to time of filing precedent, a rule that requires complete diversity between parties to exist at the time of filing, the majority actually reaffirmed and clarified the scope of the Caterpillar exception to the time of filing rule. This Note further argues that the real impetus for the majority's decision was the fear that any tinkering with the bright-line rule of Carden, which requires courts to count the …