Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- William & Mary Law School (17)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (16)
- New York Law School (10)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (8)
- American University Washington College of Law (7)
-
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (7)
- University of Richmond (6)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (5)
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (4)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (4)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- Notre Dame Law School (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Mercer University School of Law (2)
- Selected Works (2)
- SelectedWorks (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- Washington University in St. Louis (2)
- Wayne State University (2)
- West Virginia University (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (37)
- First amendment (11)
- Defamation (8)
- Free Speech (8)
- Religion (8)
-
- Free speech (7)
- Freedom of Religion (7)
- Freedom of Speech (6)
- Branzburg v. Hayes (5)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Freedom of speech (5)
- Law and Religion (5)
- Reporter's privilege (5)
- Supreme Court (5)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (5)
- Constitutional law (4)
- Copyright (4)
- Academic freedom (3)
- Equal protection (3)
- Establishment Clause (3)
- Establishment clause (3)
- Free exercise (3)
- Freedom of the Press (3)
- Pickering v. Board of Education (3)
- Privacy (3)
- Shield laws (3)
- States (3)
- Sullivan (3)
- Canada (2)
- Censorship (2)
- Publication
-
- First Amendment Law Review (16)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (12)
- NYLS Law Review (9)
- Faculty Publications (7)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (7)
-
- Federal Communications Law Journal (4)
- Publications (4)
- Scholarly Articles (4)
- The Modern American (4)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (4)
- Articles (3)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class (3)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (2)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (2)
- Mercer Law Review (2)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (2)
- Villanova Law Review (2)
- West Virginia Law Review (2)
- William & Mary Law Review (2)
- Amicus Briefs (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 120 of 136
Full-Text Articles in Law
An Examination Of The United States Supreme Court's Recent Establishment Clause Rulings In Mccreary County, Ky. V. American Civil Liberties Union And Van Order V. Perry, Joanna L. Suyes
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
Responding to a question concerning whether or not his followers should pay taxes to the Roman government, the Bible records that Jesus answered, "Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's and unto God the things that are God's." This statement, quoted in the Bible's Gospel of Matthew, has been called one of the "most revolutionary and history-making utterances that ever fell from those lips divine.",While the famous words of Jesus make clear the existence of a distinction between the realms of religion and government, they shed little light on the type of balance that should be struck between them.
Religion, Speech, And The Minnesota Constitution: State-Based Protections Amid First Amendment Instabilities, Steven P. Aggergaard
Religion, Speech, And The Minnesota Constitution: State-Based Protections Amid First Amendment Instabilities, Steven P. Aggergaard
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Speech And Spatial Tactics, Timothy Zick
Comments: A Poisoned Arrow In His Quiver: Why Forbidding An Entire Branch Of Government From Communicating With A Reporter Violates The First Amendment, Joseph S. Johnston
Comments: A Poisoned Arrow In His Quiver: Why Forbidding An Entire Branch Of Government From Communicating With A Reporter Violates The First Amendment, Joseph S. Johnston
University of Baltimore Law Review
"[There exists] a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials."
"Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle."
Defamation Of Public Figures: North American Contrasts, Adrienne Stone
Defamation Of Public Figures: North American Contrasts, Adrienne Stone
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Transnational Communication And Defamatory Speech: A Case For Establishing Norms For The Twenty-First Century, David Goldberg
Transnational Communication And Defamatory Speech: A Case For Establishing Norms For The Twenty-First Century, David Goldberg
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Origins Of The Public Figure Doctrine In First Amendment Defamation Law, Catherine Hancock
Origins Of The Public Figure Doctrine In First Amendment Defamation Law, Catherine Hancock
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reforming The Crime Of Libel, Clive Walker
Privacy, Princesses, And Paparazzi, Barbara Mcdonald
Privacy, Princesses, And Paparazzi, Barbara Mcdonald
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction, Russell L. Weaver, David F. Partlett
Introduction, Russell L. Weaver, David F. Partlett
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Truth And Consequences: First Amendment Protection For Accurate Reporting On Government Investigations, Jonathan Donnellan, Justin Peacock
Truth And Consequences: First Amendment Protection For Accurate Reporting On Government Investigations, Jonathan Donnellan, Justin Peacock
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recoiling From Religion, Marc O. Degirolami
Recoiling From Religion, Marc O. Degirolami
Scholarly Articles
This review offers a critical appraisal of God vs. the Gavel, in particular of Professor Hamilton's discussion of the complicated idea of the public good and how it intersects with religious free exercise interests. In Part II, the review explains the structure of the book and the framework for Hamilton's conclusions about religious accommodation. It emphasizes several instances of Hamilton's use and explanation of the concept of the public good. Part III articulates Hamilton's general theory of the public good, breaking the concept down into several distinct categories suggested by the book itself. The review critiques the book's explanation and …
Bloggers As Reporters: An Effect-Based Approach To First Amendment Protections In A New Age Of Information Dissemination, Stephanie J. Frazee
Bloggers As Reporters: An Effect-Based Approach To First Amendment Protections In A New Age Of Information Dissemination, Stephanie J. Frazee
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
Numerous questions and concerns are presented by the Apple case and by the rising prominence of blogging in general. What protections are afforded to bloggers when they are relying on confidential sources to disseminate information? What protections should be afforded? How can a court determine when bloggers are acting as reporters in the first place? And, what protections do traditional reporters get in similar situations? This note will attempt to answer these questions with the purpose of the First Amendment (as well as the practicality and risks of extending its protections) in mind. The next section will follow the development …
Old Ground And New Directions At Sacred Sites On The Western Landscape, Kristen A. Carpenter
Old Ground And New Directions At Sacred Sites On The Western Landscape, Kristen A. Carpenter
Publications
The federal public lands contain places with both religious and secular value for American people. American Indians, in particular, hold certain natural features to be sacred, and visit them for ceremonies and worship. Simultaneously, non-Indians use the same places for economic, recreation, and many other purposes - and conflicts arise between these groups. In the past twenty years, a body of constitutional jurisprudence has developed to address questions of religious freedoms and public access rights on these lands that are owned and managed by the federal government. This article outlines the relevant First Amendment framework as well as recent statutes …
Introduction: Religion, Division, And The Constitution, Richard W. Garnett
Introduction: Religion, Division, And The Constitution, Richard W. Garnett
Journal Articles
Thirty-five years ago, in his landmark Lemon v. Kurtzman opinion, Chief Justice Warren Burger declared that state actions could "excessive[ly]"—and, therefore, unconstitutionally—"entangle" government and religion, not only by requiring or allowing intrusive monitoring by officials of religious institutions and activities, but also through their "divisive political potential." He worried that government actions burdened with this "potential" pose a "threat to the normal political process and "divert attention from the myriad issues and problems that confront every level of government." And, he insisted that "political division along religious lines was one of the principal evils against which the First Amendment was …
Religion, Division, And The First Amendment, Richard W. Garnett
Religion, Division, And The First Amendment, Richard W. Garnett
Journal Articles
Nearly thirty-five years ago, in Lemon v. Kurtzman, Chief Justice Warren Burger declared that state programs or policies could excessive(ly) - and, therefore, unconstitutionally - entangle government and religion, not only by requiring or allowing intrusive public monitoring of religious institutions and activities, but also through what he called their divisive political potential. Chief Justice Burger asserted also, and more fundamentally, that political division along religious lines was one of the principal evils against which the First Amendment was intended to protect. And from this Hobbesian premise about the inten(t) animating the First Amendment, he proceeded on the assumption that …
Equal Protection In The World Of Art And Obscenity: The Art Photographer's Latent Struggle With Obscenity Standards In Contemporary America, Elaine Wang
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
Part I of this article describes the initial hurdles that all visual art forms, including photography, face with respect to First Amendment protection given the power of visual imagery and the three-pronged test for obscenity set forth in Miller v. California. Of particular relevance is the "serious artistic value" prong of the Miller test and the problems inherent in determining who is to judge as well as how one might judge whether a work, particularly a photograph that may be construed to have a non-artistic function, possesses "serious artistic value."
Part II addresses the overall approach to photography in three …
Reconceptualizing Due Process In Juvenile Justice: Contributions From Law And Social Science, Christopher Slobogin, Mark R. Fondacaro, Tricia Cross
Reconceptualizing Due Process In Juvenile Justice: Contributions From Law And Social Science, Christopher Slobogin, Mark R. Fondacaro, Tricia Cross
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
This article challenges the accepted wisdom, at least since the Supreme Court's decision in Gault, that procedures in juvenile delinquency court should mimic the adult criminal process. The legal basis for this challenge is Gault itself, as well as the other Supreme Court cases that triggered the juvenile justice revolution of the past decades, for all of these cases relied on the due process clause, not the provisions of the Constitution that form the foundation for adult criminal procedure. That means that the central goal in juvenile justice is fundamental fairness, which does not have to be congruent with the …
Space, Place, And Speech: The Expressive Topography, Timothy Zick
Space, Place, And Speech: The Expressive Topography, Timothy Zick
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Playing Games With The First Amendment: Are Video Games Speech And May Minors' Access To Graphically Violent Video Games Be Restricted?, Gregory K. Laughlin
Playing Games With The First Amendment: Are Video Games Speech And May Minors' Access To Graphically Violent Video Games Be Restricted?, Gregory K. Laughlin
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bureaucracy And Distrust: Germaneness And The Paradoxes Of The Academic Freedom Doctrine, Alan K. Chen
Bureaucracy And Distrust: Germaneness And The Paradoxes Of The Academic Freedom Doctrine, Alan K. Chen
University of Colorado Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Rehnquist Court And The Groundwork For Greater First Amendment Scrutiny Of Intellectual Property, Mark P. Mckenna
The Rehnquist Court And The Groundwork For Greater First Amendment Scrutiny Of Intellectual Property, Mark P. Mckenna
Journal Articles
This contribution to the Washington University School of Law conference on the Rehnquist Court and the First Amendment addresses the Rehnquist Court's view of the role of the First Amendment in intellectual property cases. It argues that, while the Rehnquist Court was not eager to find a conflict between intellectual property laws and the First Amendment, there is reason to believe that it set the stage for greater First Amendment scrutiny of intellectual property protections. At the very least, the Court left that road open to future courts, which might be inclined to view intellectual property more skeptically.
The Interests Of "Peoples" In The Cooperative Management Of Sacred Sites, Kristen A. Carpenter
The Interests Of "Peoples" In The Cooperative Management Of Sacred Sites, Kristen A. Carpenter
Publications
This essay contends that there is a structural element of federal law and policy that sets up legal battles over American Indian sacred sites. The Supreme Court has held that whatever rights groups may have at sacred sites, the federal government's rights as owner and sovereign of the public lands ultimately prevails. Federal agencies can, if they choose, accommodate various interests on the public lands, but such decisions are left to fluctuating executive policy and the discretion of land managers. This approach reflects well-established doctrine in public lands law, but leaves various citizens and groups clamoring for the federal government …
Copyright Lochnerism, Raymond Shih Ray Ku
Copyright Lochnerism, Raymond Shih Ray Ku
Faculty Publications
Part I of this essay outlines the conflict between copyright and the First amendment as well as, the complementary argument for reconciling copyright and free speech, as it has been formulated by scholars and the Supreme Court. Part II discusses what I have referred to as the Framers' copyright and the extent to which arguments based upon the Framers' intent in this area may reconcile copyright and free speech. Lastly, Part III argues that reliance upon the complementary argument to deny any role for heightened First Amendment review in copyright cases is subject to two interrelated criticisms of Lochner. By …
Dilution's (Still) Uncertain Future, Mark D. Janis, Graeme B. Dinwoodie
Dilution's (Still) Uncertain Future, Mark D. Janis, Graeme B. Dinwoodie
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Intelligent Design And The First Amendment: A Response, Jay D. Wexler
Intelligent Design And The First Amendment: A Response, Jay D. Wexler
Faculty Scholarship
In September 2005, a federal district judge in Pennsylvania began presiding over the nation's first trial regarding the constitutionality of introducing the concept of "intelligent design" (ID), a purportedly scientific alternative to the theory of evolution, into the public schools. My previous work has argued that teaching ID in the public schools would raise serious constitutional problems. In a series of writings, including a full length book and several articles, Baylor University professor Francis Beckwith has argued that public schools may constitutionally teach ID. In doing so, Beckwith has critiqued a number of arguments I have previously advanced in my …
Disciplining Public Employees For Expressive Activity, Ann C. Hodges
Disciplining Public Employees For Expressive Activity, Ann C. Hodges
Law Faculty Publications
A public employee's right to free speech under the First Amendment is not unlimited and employers have the right to discipline employees for expressive activity under certain circumstances (Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 1968). The employer has an interest in ensuring that its etnployees do not under1nine its operations or ll1terfere with acco1nplishment of its objectives. At the same time, employees do not give up their constitutional rights when they accept government employment.
Academic Freedom: Disciplinary Lessons From Hogwarts, Emily M. Calhoun
Academic Freedom: Disciplinary Lessons From Hogwarts, Emily M. Calhoun
Publications
No abstract provided.
Foreword, Richard B. Collins
First Amendment Rights Behind Bars: To Deny A Prisoner Pornography, The Third Circuit In Ramirez V. Pugh Requires Proof Of Detriment To Rehabilitation, Victoria Ford
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal
No abstract provided.