Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Law

Race[,] Science, History, And Law, David Caudill Jul 2003

Race[,] Science, History, And Law, David Caudill

David S Caudill

No abstract provided.


Law-And-Literature, Literature-And-Science, And Enhancing The Discourse Of Law/Science Relations, David Caudill Jul 2003

Law-And-Literature, Literature-And-Science, And Enhancing The Discourse Of Law/Science Relations, David Caudill

David S Caudill

No abstract provided.


A Consumer-Use Approach To Products Liability, Alan Calnan Jan 2003

A Consumer-Use Approach To Products Liability, Alan Calnan

Alan Calnan

In dicta, courts have had no trouble identifying unreasonable product uses. Indeed, over the years, they have compiled an extensive list of examples. That list includes the following pearls of wisdom. An automobile should not be used as a bulldozer. A shovel should not be used as a doorstop. A hunting and fishing knife should not be used to shave. A knife should not be used as a toothpick. An electric drill should not be used to clean teeth. A power saw should not be used to clip fingernails. A motorized hedge clipper should not be used to trim beards. …


The State’S Perpetual Protection Of Adultery: Examining Koestler V. Pollard And Wisconsin’S Faded Adultery Torts, Nehal A. Patel Jan 2003

The State’S Perpetual Protection Of Adultery: Examining Koestler V. Pollard And Wisconsin’S Faded Adultery Torts, Nehal A. Patel

Nehal A. Patel

No abstract provided.


Factless Jurisprudence, Darren Hutchinson Dec 2002

Factless Jurisprudence, Darren Hutchinson

Darren L Hutchinson

No abstract provided.


The Secession Reference And The Limits Of Law, Richard Kay Dec 2002

The Secession Reference And The Limits Of Law, Richard Kay

Richard Kay

When the Supreme Court of Canada issued its judgment on the legality of "unilateral" Quebec secession in August 1998 many Canadians did not know what to make of it. The Court held that the only lawful way in which Quebec might depart the Canadian federation was through one of the amendment mechanisms provided in the Constitution Act 1982. It thus affirmed that Quebec could not secede without the agreement of at least the Houses of the federal Parliament and some number of provincial legislative assemblies. Prime Minister Chretien declared the next day that the judgement was a "victory for all …