Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (45)
- University of Colorado Law School (10)
- Selected Works (6)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (5)
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
-
- University of New Hampshire (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (3)
- West Virginia University (3)
- Duke Law (2)
- Mercer University School of Law (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Montclair State University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (45)
- State law; State administrative decision; (27)
- State law; State administrative decision (18)
- Administrative law (6)
- Judicial review (5)
-
- United States (5)
- Administrative Law (4)
- Congress (4)
- APA (3)
- Cigarettes (3)
- Command-and-control (3)
- Ex ante (3)
- Ex post (3)
- Regulation (3)
- Smoking (3)
- Tobacco Resolution (3)
- Administration Law (2)
- Administrative Procedure Act (2)
- Administrative procedure (2)
- BLM (2)
- Balance costs and benefits (2)
- Big Bend National Park (2)
- Bureau of Land Management (2)
- Canada (2)
- Colorado (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Cost effectiveness (2)
- Environmental law (2)
- Ethics (2)
- Excise tax (2)
- Publication
-
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (45)
- Outdoor Recreation: Promise and Peril in the New West (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (10)
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Articles (5)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (3)
-
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (3)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (3)
- RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002) (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- David A. Wirth (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (2)
- Florida State University Law Review (2)
- LLM Theses (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- West Virginia Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles & Book Chapters (1)
- Daniel Kanstroom (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (1)
- John L. Gedid (1)
- Mercer Law Review (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (1)
- Patricia A. McCoy (1)
- Publications from President Jonathan G.S. Koppell (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 122
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Birthday Party: The Terrible Or Terrific Two’S? 1996 Federal Telecommunications Act, Kathleen Wallman
A Birthday Party: The Terrible Or Terrific Two’S? 1996 Federal Telecommunications Act, Kathleen Wallman
Federal Communications Law Journal
As we celebrate the second anniversary of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, we can see that the predictions of instant cross-industry competition that were made at its birth were rather euphoric. Despite the unexpected twists and turns of the first two years, there have been a number of significant market developments suggesting that the lowering of barriers that the Act effected have put things on the right course. However, the success of the Act will be rather fragile during the next few years, as it is subject to reversal by market as well as judicial forces. We should therefore continue …
Confusion Reigns Supreme: The United States Supreme Court's Refusal To Grant Certiorari In L.R. Willson And Sons, Inc. V. Oshrc Perpetuates The Split Among Circuits In Osha Employee Misconduct Cases, Heather Malone Garrison
Confusion Reigns Supreme: The United States Supreme Court's Refusal To Grant Certiorari In L.R. Willson And Sons, Inc. V. Oshrc Perpetuates The Split Among Circuits In Osha Employee Misconduct Cases, Heather Malone Garrison
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brief Amici Curiae Of Intellectual Property Professors In Support Of Petitoner, Thomas G. Field Jr., John F. Duffy, Craig Allen Nard
Brief Amici Curiae Of Intellectual Property Professors In Support Of Petitoner, Thomas G. Field Jr., John F. Duffy, Craig Allen Nard
Law Faculty Scholarship
Congress enacted the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in 1946 as a comprehensive statute to regulate the field of federal administrative law. In holding that the PTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences is not subject to the standards of judicial review set forth in the APA, the [Zurko] decision isolates patent law from the rest of administrative law and undermines the APA’s goal of achieving consistency and uniformity in federal administrative law.
Appeal No. 0632: Barclay Petroleum, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0632: Barclay Petroleum, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 97-153
Appeal No. 0653: Marlin & Lowell Henthorn V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0653: Marlin & Lowell Henthorn V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 98-56
Appeal No. 0652: Diane Bakaris V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0652: Diane Bakaris V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 98-45 (Everflow Eastern)
Conciliation Des Litiges Et Formes Alternatives De Régulation En Droit Administratif Fédéral, France Houle, Daniel Mockle
Conciliation Des Litiges Et Formes Alternatives De Régulation En Droit Administratif Fédéral, France Houle, Daniel Mockle
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
Despite the considerable attention devoted to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Canada, few studies are available on its impact in public law, especially in federal administrative law. Yet, there is much evidence that these techniques are increasingly used and it is therefore timely to catalogue and classify them. To this end, a distinction is drawn between dispute resolution techniques used for transactional purposes and those used for regulatory purposes. This classification provides the basis for a theoretical analysis which focuses on public law and raises questions generally neglected in the existing literature concerning ADR: the particular nature of federal law, …
Undoing The New Deal Through The New Presidentialism, Cynthia R. Farina
Undoing The New Deal Through The New Presidentialism, Cynthia R. Farina
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Mend It Or End It? What To Do With The Independent Counsel Statute, Julian A. Cook
Mend It Or End It? What To Do With The Independent Counsel Statute, Julian A. Cook
Scholarly Works
The tenure of Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr has generated much debate among scholars, politicians, and the media in recent years regarding the efficacy of the independent counsel statute, which is scheduled to expire in June 1999. Enacted in response to the Watergate saga, and particularly the infamous “Saturday Night Massacre,” the independent counsel statute was designed to remove politics from the prosecution of executive branch officials and to foster public confidence in the prosecutorial process. Advocates claim that the statute, though flawed, is the best system available to address alleged criminal wrongdoing by high-ranking executive branch officials, as well as …
The Form And Substance Of Ethics: Prenatal Diagnosis In The Baird Report, Rachel Ariss
The Form And Substance Of Ethics: Prenatal Diagnosis In The Baird Report, Rachel Ariss
Dalhousie Law Journal
This article analyses the employment of textual tactics in the Final Report of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies. The author argues that the Commission uses these tactics to persuade several different audiences that its stance is correct, and simultaneously to manage dissent over new reproductive technologies. Analysis of textual tactics opens the ethical position of the Commission to substantive questioning. The authorfocuses on the Commission's discussion of prenatal diagnosis for genetic anomalies and concludes that the Commission fails to engage with ethical arguments put forward by persons with disabilities and their advocates. The conclusion also encourages the development …
Ultra Vires Takings, Matthew D. Zinn
Ultra Vires Takings, Matthew D. Zinn
Michigan Law Review
When does legislative or administrative regulatory action "go[] too far" and effectively amount to an .appropriation of private property for which the Fifth Amendment requires just compensation? This question has turned out to be one of the thorniest in American constitutional law. The Supreme Court has identified several circumstances in which one can expect to find a regulatory taking, but its numerous pronouncements on the subject give no clear rule to distinguish compensable takings from noncompensable interference with property rights. Notwithstanding its volume, the commentary on the Takings Clause by and large addresses only proper governmental action that rises to …
Creating True Believers: Putting Macro Theory Into Practice, Minna J. Kotkin
Creating True Believers: Putting Macro Theory Into Practice, Minna J. Kotkin
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
International Decisions. European Communities - Measures Concerning Meat And Meat Products, David A. Wirth
International Decisions. European Communities - Measures Concerning Meat And Meat Products, David A. Wirth
David A. Wirth
No abstract provided.
Appeal No. 0642: Stallion Petroleum V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0642: Stallion Petroleum V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 97-209
Appeal No. 0629: Halwell Company, Inc. (B T Energy, Inc.) V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0629: Halwell Company, Inc. (B T Energy, Inc.) V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 97-126
Appeal No. 0626: Halwell Company, Inc. (B T Energy, Inc.) V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0626: Halwell Company, Inc. (B T Energy, Inc.) V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 97-105
Appeal No. 0591: Centry Surety Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0591: Centry Surety Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 96-187 (Prospect Oil)
Appeal No. 0647: Douglas & Jean Hiestand V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0647: Douglas & Jean Hiestand V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Permit Issuance, D & L Energy, Inc.
Appeal No. 0624: Halwell Company, Inc. (B T Energy, Inc.) V. Divisio Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0624: Halwell Company, Inc. (B T Energy, Inc.) V. Divisio Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 97-101
Appeal No. 0651: Pioneer Natural Resources V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0651: Pioneer Natural Resources V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 98-31 (Pink Oak Petroleum)
Appeal No. 0602: Century Surety V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0602: Century Surety V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 96-252 (I-Vada, Inc.)
Amicus Brief Of Thomas G. Field, Jr., Pro Se Supporting In Principle, On Rehearing The Commissioner Of Patents And Trademarks, Thomas G. Field Jr.
Amicus Brief Of Thomas G. Field, Jr., Pro Se Supporting In Principle, On Rehearing The Commissioner Of Patents And Trademarks, Thomas G. Field Jr.
Law Faculty Scholarship
To those unfamiliar with the long, often bitter, struggle over equally compelling needs to provide, on the one hand, innovators with an adequate opportunity to recoup risk capital and to avoid, on the other, erecting unwarranted barriers to competition, a dispute over the proper scope of review for Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) patent appeals will seem both trivial and arcane. This case involves more than semantics -- its resolution turns on the allocation of power among three, and arguably four, branches of government. This Court, itself, has a stake.
Appeal No. 0648: Rhys & Deborah Jones V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0648: Rhys & Deborah Jones V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Permit Issuance, D & L Energy, Inc.
On Misusing “Revolution” And “Reform”: Procedural Due Process And The New Welfare Act, Cynthia R. Farina
On Misusing “Revolution” And “Reform”: Procedural Due Process And The New Welfare Act, Cynthia R. Farina
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
After a long dry spell, the debate over procedural due process flows again. The Supreme Court has announced the first major doctrinal revision in years; Congress has gutted the regulatory program that underlay Goldberg v. Kelly; and Richard Pierce has published an essay in the Columbia Law Review prophesying a radical de-evolution of due process doctrine that will bring constitutional law into line with the profound political and social revolution evidenced by welfare “reform.” My essay takes Professor Pierce's recent work as a springboard for reengaging the debate about the direction of procedural due process. I begin by recapitulating …
"Validly Adopted Interpretations": Defining The Deference Standard In Aviation Certificate Action Appeals, Denise A. Banaszewski
"Validly Adopted Interpretations": Defining The Deference Standard In Aviation Certificate Action Appeals, Denise A. Banaszewski
Washington Law Review
The split-enforcement model of agency administration creates a dilemma for the adjudicating agency regarding how much deference it should allot interpretive documents promulgated by the agency with rulemaking authority. In 1992, Congress sought to resolve this problem in the area of aviation safety by statutorily mandating that the adjudicating agency, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), defer to "validly adopted" interpretations generated by the rulemaking agency, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Ironically, the statute created even more uncertainty because the term "validly adopted" is vague and remains undefined. Subsequent decisions have not clarified exactly when the NTSB considers itself bound. …
State Regulation Of Charitable Solicitation, Elaine Waterhouse Wilson
State Regulation Of Charitable Solicitation, Elaine Waterhouse Wilson
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Administrative Law, Terri L. Carver
Administrative Law, Terri L. Carver
Mercer Law Review
The Eleventh Circuit ruled on numerous administrative law issues in 1997, including exhaustion of administrative remedies, deference to agency legal interpretations, and the time period for appealing federal agency actions. The Eleventh Circuit also took a close look at the scope of an inspector general's subpoena powers and clarified the role of agency investigations versus inspectors general investigations.
The Eleventh Circuit decided several cases of first impression in 1997. In a case of first impression nationwide, the Eleventh Circuit ruled that determining the amount of attorney fees in an administrative case was a collateral issue.' Therefore, the issue of attorney …
Administrative Law, Robin Jean Davis, Louis J. Palmer Jr.
Administrative Law, Robin Jean Davis, Louis J. Palmer Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appeal No. 0603: Century Surety Co. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0603: Century Surety Co. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 96-251
Outdoor Recreation And Water Development: The National Recreation Lakes Study, Bruce R. Brown
Outdoor Recreation And Water Development: The National Recreation Lakes Study, Bruce R. Brown
Outdoor Recreation: Promise and Peril in the New West (Summer Conference, June 8-10)
12 pages.