Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Rico, Cce, And Other Complex Crimes: The Transformation Of American Criminal Law?, Susan W. Brenner Nov 1993

Rico, Cce, And Other Complex Crimes: The Transformation Of American Criminal Law?, Susan W. Brenner

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


Section 8: Criminal Law And Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School Sep 1993

Section 8: Criminal Law And Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School

Supreme Court Preview

No abstract provided.


Federal Jury Instructions And The Consequences Of A Successful Insanity Defense, Joseph P. Liu May 1993

Federal Jury Instructions And The Consequences Of A Successful Insanity Defense, Joseph P. Liu

Joseph P. Liu

This Note argues that trial judges should instruct jurors about the consequences of an insanity verdict, but that judges must strive to minimize the potentially prejudicial impact of such an instruction by explicitly instructing the jury not to consider this information in arriving at a verdict.


Battered Woman Syndrome, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1993

Battered Woman Syndrome, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Protecting Criminal Defendants' Rights When The Government Adduces Scientific Evidence: The Confrontation Clause And Other Alternatives─A Response To Professor Giannelli, James W. Diehm Dec 1992

Protecting Criminal Defendants' Rights When The Government Adduces Scientific Evidence: The Confrontation Clause And Other Alternatives─A Response To Professor Giannelli, James W. Diehm

James W. Diehm

In his article Professor Giannelli articulates quite clearly the confrontation issues that arise when the government seeks to introduce scientific evidence testimony in a criminal case." His work is helpful to our understanding of the problems that develop in the limited contexts of expert testimony and laboratory reports. It also provides valuable insights into the relationship between the Confrontation Clause and the hearsay rules. However, perhaps most important is the contribution that he makes to our understanding of the right of confrontation and our attempts to define that right and its limitations. While I find myself to be in general …