Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (37)
- State and Local Government Law (30)
- Supreme Court of the United States (30)
- Courts (28)
- Criminal Procedure (15)
-
- Fourth Amendment (9)
- Judges (9)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (9)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (8)
- Criminal Law (6)
- Fourteenth Amendment (5)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Civil Procedure (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Law and Race (4)
- Election Law (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Disability Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- History (1)
- Housing Law (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 50
Full-Text Articles in Law
Ugly: An Inquiry Into The Problem Of Racial Gerrymandering Under The Voting Rights Act, Daniel D. Polsby, Robert D. Popper
Ugly: An Inquiry Into The Problem Of Racial Gerrymandering Under The Voting Rights Act, Daniel D. Polsby, Robert D. Popper
Michigan Law Review
In the discussion that follows, we focus on the case of congressional districting rather than on districting in general. Although we proceed in this manner for the sake of clarity, it is also true that no single, all-purpose normative theory of electoral mechanics will cover every case of democratic representation, from county commissions to mosquito control districts to sovereign legislatures. We do not claim that one can generalize our argument to every sort of election to which the VRA might apply. Yet we think our argument does approximate a theory of general application.
Expressive Harms, "Bizarre Districts," And Voting Rights: Evaluating Election-District Appearances After Shaw V. Reno, Richard H. Pildes, Richard G. Niemi
Expressive Harms, "Bizarre Districts," And Voting Rights: Evaluating Election-District Appearances After Shaw V. Reno, Richard H. Pildes, Richard G. Niemi
Michigan Law Review
This article attempts to define the constitutional principles that characterize Shaw and to suggest how those principles might be applied in a consistent, meaningful way. Part I, in which we argue that Shaw must be understood to rest on a distinctive conception of the kinds of harms against which the Constitution protects, is the theoretical heart of the article. We call these expressive harms, as opposed to more familiar, material harms. In Part II, we briefly survey the history of previous, largely unsuccessful, efforts in other legal contexts to give principled content to these kinds of harms in redistricting. …
Race And Redistricting: Drawing Constitutional Lines After Shaw V. Reno, T. Alexander Aleinikoff, Samuel Isaacharoff
Race And Redistricting: Drawing Constitutional Lines After Shaw V. Reno, T. Alexander Aleinikoff, Samuel Isaacharoff
Michigan Law Review
Shaw is no doubt a major opinion that attempts to define limits on the use of racial or ethnic classifications in electoral redistricting. The main thrust of this article is to assess the critical question of whether Shaw renders unconstitutional the type of race-conscious realignment of electoral configurations that have given meaning to the voting rights reforms of the past two decades. In making this assessment, we try to ascertain exactly how the Court has limited the use of race-conscious districting, and we try to determine whether there is any jurisprudential coherence to the Court's latest confrontation with the law …
Deadly Confusion: Juror Instructions In Capital Cases , Theodore Eisenberg, Martin T. Wells
Deadly Confusion: Juror Instructions In Capital Cases , Theodore Eisenberg, Martin T. Wells
Cornell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Persistence Of The Ancient Regime: Custom Utility And The Common Law In The Nineteenth Century , Andrea C. Loux
Persistence Of The Ancient Regime: Custom Utility And The Common Law In The Nineteenth Century , Andrea C. Loux
Cornell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Three Mistakes About Interpretation, Paul Campos
Three Mistakes About Interpretation, Paul Campos
Michigan Law Review
The single most important word in modem constitutional theory is "interpretation." The single most confusing word in modem constitutional theory is "interpretation." What accounts for this unhappy state of affairs?
I will try to show that Barry Friedman's assertions, as well as others that are but rephrasings of the same basic ideas, are not the common sense truths that so many constitutional theorists assume them to be, but are instead the products of an extraordinarily confused and ultimately incoherent set of assumptions regarding the interpretation of language.
The Constitution, The Legislature, And Unfair Surprise: Toward A Reliance-Based Approach To The Contract Clause, Robert A. Graham
The Constitution, The Legislature, And Unfair Surprise: Toward A Reliance-Based Approach To The Contract Clause, Robert A. Graham
Michigan Law Review
This Note argues that the Court should return to a reliance-based approach to Contract Clause challenges, fashioned loosely along the same lines as the HRID. Although it does not advocate that the Court revivify the rules created by the early decisions, the Note proposes that the Court look to the private parties' expectations and, more specifically, to the reasonableness of those expectations in deciding the clause's applicability to a particular case. Part I provides a brief history of the Contract Clause and its development. This Part follows the clause from the Constitutional Convention through the 1980s to illustrate the Court's …
The Advocacy Of "Constitutional" Conduct, Marshall C. Derks
The Advocacy Of "Constitutional" Conduct, Marshall C. Derks
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Article Ii Revisionism, Cass R. Sunstein
Article Ii Revisionism, Cass R. Sunstein
Michigan Law Review
One of the most striking developments of the last decade has been the new use of Article II in public law adjudication. Article II is a prominent feature not only of cases involving the creation of federal institutions that are independent of the President, but also of new disputes involving reviewability, scope of review, and standing.
Professor Krent and Mr. Shenkman have performed a valuable service in spelling out the argument that Article II, rather than Article III, justifies constitutional limits on legislative grants of standing. Indeed, on several important matters, we are very much in agreement. In this brief …
The Future Of Our Past: The Legal Mind And The Legacy Of Classical Common-Law Thought, Donald H. Gjerdingen
The Future Of Our Past: The Legal Mind And The Legacy Of Classical Common-Law Thought, Donald H. Gjerdingen
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Of Citizen Suits And Citizen Sunstein, Harold J. Krent, Ethan G. Shenkman
Of Citizen Suits And Citizen Sunstein, Harold J. Krent, Ethan G. Shenkman
Michigan Law Review
After briefly summarizing Lujan and addressing Sunstein's critique, we explore the concept of accountability underlying the creation of a single executive in Article II. We then apply our theory of the unitary executive to several examples of broad grants of statutory standing, concluding that Congress can confer standing on private citizens only if it specifically articulates and individuates the interests whose violation gives rise to a cognizable case. Although we agree with Sunstein's view that broad grants of statutory standing do not necessarily trench upon constitutional values, we ultimately side with Justice Scalia in concluding that universal citizen standing, as …
If The Eye Offend Thee, Turn Off The Color, John Harrison
If The Eye Offend Thee, Turn Off The Color, John Harrison
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Color-Blind Constitution by Andrew Kull
The Political Process As Final Solution, Charles M. Freeland
The Political Process As Final Solution, Charles M. Freeland
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Role Of Religious Values In Judicial Decision Making, Scott C. Idleman
The Role Of Religious Values In Judicial Decision Making, Scott C. Idleman
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Revisiting Roe V. Wade: Substance And Process In The Abortion Debate, Margaret G. Farrell
Revisiting Roe V. Wade: Substance And Process In The Abortion Debate, Margaret G. Farrell
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Legal Developments: Ethics In Government Federal Advisory Committees, Foreign Conflicts Of Interest, The Constitution, And Dr. Franklin's Snuff Box, Gerald S. Schatz
Legal Developments: Ethics In Government Federal Advisory Committees, Foreign Conflicts Of Interest, The Constitution, And Dr. Franklin's Snuff Box, Gerald S. Schatz
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Interpretation And Activist Fantasies, Raoul Berger
Constitutional Interpretation And Activist Fantasies, Raoul Berger
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Fencing Out Politically Unpopular Groups From The Normal Political Processes: The Equal Protection Concerns Of Colorado Amendment Two, Craig Cassin Burke
Fencing Out Politically Unpopular Groups From The Normal Political Processes: The Equal Protection Concerns Of Colorado Amendment Two, Craig Cassin Burke
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
American Indian Influence On The United States Constitution And Its Framers, Robert J. Miller
American Indian Influence On The United States Constitution And Its Framers, Robert J. Miller
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Adequate Education For All Maryland's Children: Morally Right, Economically Necessary, And Constitutionally Required, Susan P. Leviton, Matthew H. Joseph
An Adequate Education For All Maryland's Children: Morally Right, Economically Necessary, And Constitutionally Required, Susan P. Leviton, Matthew H. Joseph
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
There Goes The Neighborhood: The Evolution Of "Family" In Local Zoning Ordinances, William Graham
There Goes The Neighborhood: The Evolution Of "Family" In Local Zoning Ordinances, William Graham
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.