Law Commons^™

Berne Revision: The Continuing Drama, Ralph Oman, Lewis Flacks

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel Commentaries, Morton David Goldberg, Robert J. Hart, Jean-Francois Verstrynge

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel Discussion, Ralph Oman

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Gatt And Nafta Provisions On Intellectual Property, Emery Simon

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Trips Component Of The Gatt’S Uruguay Round: Competitive Prospects For Intellectual Property Owners In An Integrated World Market, J.H. Reichman

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Trade, Trips And Nafta, Joel R. Reidenberg

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel Discussion, Emery Simon, J.H. Reichman, Joel R. Reidenberg, Jean-Francois Verstrynge

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Trademark Developments In The Former U.S.S.R. And Eastern Europe, Janet L. Hoffman

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

International Patent Law Developments, Harold C. Wegner

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel Commentary, William T. Fryer, Iii

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel Discussion, S. Leslie Misrock, Oreste Montalto, Harold C. Wegner

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Introduction, John Richards

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Overview Of Developments In Europe On Industrial Design Protection, Hugh Griffiths

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

International Industrial Design Law Developments, William T. Fryer, Iii

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Patent And Trademark Developments In The European Community, Oreste Montalto

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Past And Current Trends In The Evolution Of Design Protection Law – A Comment, J.H. Reichman

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel Discussion, William T. Fryer, Iii, Hugh Griffiths, Jean-Francois Verstrynge, John Richards

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Madrid Protocol, Carlisle E. Walters

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel Commentaries, Robert J. Eck, Thomas J. Hoffmann

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel Discussion, Robert J. Eck, Thomas J. Hoffmann, William T. Fryer, Iii, Janet L. Hoffman

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

International Aspects Of Patent Protection For Biotechnology, John Richards

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel Commentaries, S. Leslie Misrock, Oreste Montalto, Harold C. Wegner

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel Discussion, John Richards, S. Leslie Misrock, Harold C. Wegner

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Federal Jury Instructions And The Consequences Of A Successful Insanity Defense, Joseph P. Liu

Joseph P. Liu

Speaking To The Ghost: Idea And Expression In Copyright, Leslie A. Kurtz

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

How The East Was Won: A Critique Of U.S. Tactics In Negotiating Patent Protection For Pharmaceuticals In Thailand, Michael Begg

Washington International Law Journal

In February 1992, Thailand amended its patent law to provide patent protection for drugs. The amendment resulted from pressure by the United States pharmaceutical industry and the United States Trade Representative; it was not a Thai internal policy decision. Bleak prospects in the U.S. drug market due to a climate of increasing restraints on drug prices have led the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association to push for patent protection for their products abroad. Consequently, the United States Trade Representative pressured Thailand to amend its Patent Act to include pharmaceuticals, threatening to use Section 337 of the Trade and Tariff Act of 1930 …

Special 301: An Effective Tool Against Thailand's Intellectual Property Violations, Preeti Sinha

Washington International Law Journal

Special 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act grants the United States Trade Representative the authority to target countries that do not adequately protect intellectual property rights. The USTR has been investigating and negotiating with several countries, including Thailand, in an effort to improve intellectual property protections for American products. As a result, Thailand has instituted noteworthy changes in its copyright and patent laws. This Comment recommends that the USTR continue to negotiate with Thailand, and that the USTR continue to exert pressure on Thailand. This Comment also suggests that because Thailand has taken steps to improve protection …

Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. V. Smith: Willful Infringement-Reliance On A Flawed Letter From Counsel, Brian David Bellamy

Mercer Law Review

In Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Smith, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals held that an infringer's reliance on patent counsel's letter is justified if the "opinion [is] thorough enough, as combined with other factors, to instill a belief in the infringer that a court might reasonably hold the patent is invalid, not infringed, or unenforceable."' In crafting this decision, the court focused on the intent and the reasonable beliefs of the infringer. By relying on a letter from patent counsel, Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation ("Ortho") had a reasonable basis for believing that it had not infringed the patent of American …

[Introduction] The Science Court Is Dead - Long Live The Science Court, Thomas G. Field

RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)

[Excerpt] "It is a pleasure to introduce this symposium issue with its range of current thoughts about what Arthur Kantrowitz invented a little over twenty-five years ago and has since come to be known as the "Science Court." The pleasure is enhanced by being able to include papers by Dr. Kantrowitz, Allan Mazur (who worked closely with him), Carl Cranor, Itzhak Jacoby and Sheila Jasanoff - as well as an extensive list of citations to other discussions. In approaching these papers, readers may find it helpful to consider what Kantrowitz invented, he and others have attempted to improve, and the …

The First Amendment And The Media: Controversial Issues In The 1990s Program Schedule And Introduction, Editorial Board

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.