Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 10 of 10

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Disinterested Person: An Alternative Approach To Shareholder Derivative Litigation, Joel Seligman Oct 1992

The Disinterested Person: An Alternative Approach To Shareholder Derivative Litigation, Joel Seligman

Law and Contemporary Problems

It is shown that in shareholder derivative litigation certain features of the Continental civil procedure model can be combined profitably with the more adversarial US model through the medium of a disinterested person.


Civil Justice Expense And Delay Reduction Plan Pursuant To The Civil Justice Reform Act Of 1990, Georgia State University Law Review Oct 1992

Civil Justice Expense And Delay Reduction Plan Pursuant To The Civil Justice Reform Act Of 1990, Georgia State University Law Review

Georgia State University Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Practice And Problems Of Plain Meaning: A Response To Aleinikoff And Shaw, Frederick Schauer Apr 1992

The Practice And Problems Of Plain Meaning: A Response To Aleinikoff And Shaw, Frederick Schauer

Vanderbilt Law Review

The attention so many of the participants in this Symposium have paid to my thoughts about the role of plain meaning in statutory interpretation' is both gratifying and surprising. Among those scholars finding my ideas worthy of note are Professors Aleinikoff and Shaw, and my aim is both to comment on their contribution here and to respond more generally to what others have said about my views on the role of plain meaning. By continuing the discussion I hope to clarify some of the claims I have made about plain meaning, and in doing so to foster a better appreciation …


Litigation As A Predatory Practice, Gary Myers Jan 1992

Litigation As A Predatory Practice, Gary Myers

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Copyright Misuse As A Defense In An Infringement Action: Lasercomb America, Inc. V. Reynolds, John Baker Mcclanahan Jan 1992

Copyright Misuse As A Defense In An Infringement Action: Lasercomb America, Inc. V. Reynolds, John Baker Mcclanahan

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Abrogation Of Expert Dissection In Popular Music Copyright Infringement Cases: Suggested Modifications For The Implementation Of The Lay Listener Standard, Matthew W. Daus Jan 1992

The Abrogation Of Expert Dissection In Popular Music Copyright Infringement Cases: Suggested Modifications For The Implementation Of The Lay Listener Standard, Matthew W. Daus

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Rationalist Tradition At Trial, James L. Kainen Jan 1992

The Rationalist Tradition At Trial, James L. Kainen

Fordham Law Review

Analysis of Evidence: How to Do Things With Facts Based On Wigmore's Science of Judicial Proof, By Terrence Anderson and William Twining (with an Appendix on Probablity and Proof by Philip Dawid). Little, Brown and Company, and London: George Weidenfeld and Nicolson, Ltd., 1991. Pp. 457. $22.00. (Teacher's Manual. Pp. 181)


Settlement In Securities Fraud: Is Settlement Promoting Litigation - In Re Jiffy Lube Securities Litigation, Brian R. Hajicek Jan 1992

Settlement In Securities Fraud: Is Settlement Promoting Litigation - In Re Jiffy Lube Securities Litigation, Brian R. Hajicek

Journal of Dispute Resolution

In the complex securities fraud arena, partial pretrial settlement in cases involving multiple defendants would appear to reduce litigation in the dispute. However, conflict over the proper method of allocating responsibility for a damage award among settling and non-settling defendants can in fact increase litigation. Federal courts disagree as to which method most fairly and equitably apportions damage liability. In re Jiffy Lube Securities Litigation is the most recent case that touches upon the issue of damage allocation among settling and non-settling defendants. This Note will address competing policy considerations which drive courts to choose different allocative methods.


Report Of The New York State Judicial Commission On Minorities Jan 1992

Report Of The New York State Judicial Commission On Minorities

Fordham Urban Law Journal

The Commission was given a three-fold mandate to study how (1) court participants and the public at large perceive minority treatment in the New York Court System; (2) the representation of minorities in non-judicial staff positions within the court system; and (3) the number of minorities, both elected and appointed, in judicial positions in New York. The Commission recommended a milieu of changes to address the problems of racism in the court system and proposed another commission-- with a five year mandate-- be created to implement these recommendations, further analyze and collect data on race and the court system, and …


Five Year Report Of The New York Judicial Committee On Women In The Courts, The Judicial Committee On Women In The Courts Jan 1992

Five Year Report Of The New York Judicial Committee On Women In The Courts, The Judicial Committee On Women In The Courts

Fordham Urban Law Journal

In response to a report submitted by the Judicial Committee on Women, which concluded gender bias to be a "pervasive problem" in the New York State Court System, a Task Force was created to implement the recommendations of that committee. The Five Year Report is a summary of the work done by the Committee and notes the progress made in the fight for more gender equality in our courts. The Committee concluded that although significant progress has been made, there is still a long way to go in the fight for gender equality.