Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- A Tribute To A.L. Philpott (1)
- Addington-Beaman Lumber Co v. Lincoln Savings and Loan Ass'n (1)
- Allen v. Chapman (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law Articles (1)
- Board of Zoning Appeals v. Glasser Brothers Corp. (1)
-
- Cameras In Virginia Courtrooms (1)
- Carmel v. City of Hampton (1)
- City of Virginia Beach v. ESG Enterprises (1)
- Davis v. Cleve Marsh Hunt Club (1)
- Dedication (1)
- Edmonton Homes v. McKinney Group (1)
- Friends of Clark Mountain Foundation v. Board of Supervisors of Orange County (1)
- Funches v. Funches (1)
- Garrison v. First Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n (1)
- Hayes v. Aquia Marina (1)
- Holland v. Johnson (1)
- Holly Hill Farm Corp. v. Rowe (1)
- Index (1)
- James T. Bush Construction Co v. Patel (1)
- Lamar Corp v. City of Richmond (1)
- McLeskey v. Ocean Park Investors (1)
- On The Passing of A.L. Philpott (1)
- Perspective (1)
- Pitts v. United States (1)
- Princess Anne Hills Civic League v. Susan Constant Real Estate Trust (1)
- Remembering A.L. Philpott (1)
- Richardson v. Richardson (1)
- Sentara Enterprises v. CCP Associates (1)
- Tiller v. Owen (1)
- Tribute To A.L. Philpott (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Property Law, Charles H. Rothenberg
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Property Law, Charles H. Rothenberg
University of Richmond Law Review
Both the Virginia Supreme Court and the General Assembly addressed important issues affecting property law in Virginia over the past year. For instance, the Virginia Supreme Court considered for the first time the extent to which dominant estate owners could improve rights of way benefiting their property. The General Assembly has gone a long way toward vitiating the long held caveat emptor rule predominant in Virginia by adopting a residential sales disclosure statute. These and other important cases and statutes are discussed below.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.